---
title: 'The best AI Coding tool for webdesign ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini vs DeepSeek'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=MFWegYJ-sVU'
video_id: 'MFWegYJ-sVU'
date: 2026-06-19
duration_sec: 0
---

# The best AI Coding tool for webdesign ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini vs DeepSeek

> Source: [The best AI Coding tool for webdesign ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini vs DeepSeek](https://youtube.com/watch?v=MFWegYJ-sVU)

## Summary

The video compares four AI coding toolsChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeekin building a professional company website. Each tool receives the same prompt and content to ensure a fair evaluation of their web development capabilities. The creator tests design quality, mobile responsiveness, and the need for revisions before giving a final verdict.

### Key Points

- **Content Generation with ChatGPT** [0:35] — Used ChatGPT to generate SEO-friendly content from client's company info, ensuring consistent base content for all models.
- **Prompt Crafting for Web Development** [1:20] — Detailed prompt requested a professional, modern website with hover effects, animations, and a specific color theme, using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
- **Design Comparison: ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini vs DeepSeek** [2:31] — ChatGPT required manual code copy and had no mobile responsiveness; basic design. Claude provided built-in preview but menu button failed initially. Gemini was lighter but had menu issues and sparse content. DeepSeek delivered a working form, mobile responsiveness, and rich colors on first try.
- **Revision Efficiency: Claude's Partial Fix vs Others** [5:59] — Claude allowed targeted fixes (e.g., menu button) without rewriting all code, saving time. DeepSeek was the only model that needed zero revisions.
- **DeepSeek's Length and Quality** [9:50] — DeepSeek produced 1,287 total lines, the longest output, with thorough mobile responsiveness.

## Transcript

I'm going to show you how I created a
website for a company using four popular
AI coding tools and at the end and
according to my experience I will tell
you my opinion about the best AI coding
tools to create a website. These tools
are free to use and you can have the
source codes and you can sell it or host
them in any server or whatever. Here we
have chatgpt claude gemini and deepseek.
I've opened them in separate spaces so
you can get clear idea about user
experience of each tool. Before we start
building our website, we need to figure
out what content we want to include.
Company information has been provided by
the client and I am going to use it to
generate SEO friendly content needed to
build the website using chat GPT. Here I
have defined the role and given all the
information about the company and about
what should be included
at the end. And I've asked for a SEO
friendly well ststructured professional
content. I am not going to create
content using each model because of my
goal is to find out best model for web
development not for content writing. If
we generate content using all of those
definitely they're going to be
difference between each other. Then we
cannot compare websites fairly. Okay.
Now we have the content. Let's get into
writing the prompt.
I want you to act like a professional
web developer. Create a both
professionallook and modernl looking
website for a company using the
following content. Use a decent color
theme, hover effects, ear effects, and
animations to keep the visitors engaged.
You can use HTML, CSS,JS,
libraries, frameworks as you wish, but
you're not supposed to change the given
content below. Better the prompt, the
better results. That is my strategy.
Okay. Now we have both the prompt and
the content. Let's give this prompt and
content for each AI model. First let's
try with chat GPT.
Okay. Next, let's give the prompt and
the content to Claude. It looks like
Claude accepted content a bit different.
Cool way.
Interesting.
Next, we have Gemini. Mostly the same
generating animation like Claude, but I
think this is a little bit better.
At last, Deep Seek Basic Generating
Experience.
Let's check on other models until these
are finished. It looks like the first
model we used, Claude and Chat GPT, are
finished with the generation.
I've opened separate VS Code and file
manager windows for each model so we can
compare them easily. First, let's review
the code chat GPT generated. Unlike some
other models, chat GPT haven't provided
a built-in canvas to preview the code
right here on the page. So, let me just
create a new HTML file and open it in VS
Code and paste the code chat GPT gave
me. All right, let's open this HTML file
using a browser and see the results. On
the first look, we can see good loading
effects, appear effects, hover effects,
and scrolling effects on the page as
instructed.
Now, let's see what Claude had
generated. Claude had provided with a
built-in canvas for previewing codes.
Let's have a look at this. Just like
instructed Claude 2 have added hover,
scroll, appear, and other effects to
enhance user experience. Even though
this page looks mobile responsive on the
surface, some functions like this menu
button does not seems to be working.
Let's download this and open edited in a
separate browser window for a maximum
experience.
Claude indeed have followed the
instructions and created something
beautiful for sure. Look at these
navigation button functions. Claude have
added scroll effects to navigation
between sections.
Let's again have a look at the design
chat GPT created. Chat GPT also have
added a likewise effect for navigating
between sections but it is not as smooth
as the one Claudia designed. Let's check
the mobile responsibility of the design
chat GPT gave. It looks like chat GPD
have not gave much thought about mobile
devices. Let's see how Claude had done.
It seems even though the menu button is
not working properly, design itself is
not breaking on mobile devices. That's
another point compared to chat GPT.
Let's move on to the next model, Gemini.
The design Gemini provided feels much
lighter and smooth, and the effects are
also much like the previous two design.
which chat GPT and Claude provided
the menu button in this design works
without any further modifications but it
does not feels any smooth Gemini have
offered this add Gemini features button
let's see what it will do to the design
until then let's check on deepseek oops
looks like the session expired for
deepseek no worries we can just continue
from there until it is finished let's go
back to chat GPT and ask it to improve
the design.
Website should be mobile responsive.
Please update the code.
While we are at it, let's also mention
to Claude that the menu button on the
design is not working properly.
In the mobile devices, your menu is not
working even if user clicked.
Look at that. Unlike other models, Cluid
can just fix or add the part that is
needed to add or missing to the existing
code without rewriting the whole code
again, which saves us a lot of time.
Now, the menu button works just fine and
smoothly, just how I like it.
Since Gemini is also finished with the
design, let me copy this code into a
HTML file and open it in a new window.
New design and effects are not much
different from the previous designs, but
Gemini features thing have definitely
has done something.
A major different we can see in this
design is that Gemini feature has added
this AI advisor section. I don't think
this will work without proper API
integration, but let's check it out just
for the review.
As I said, it won't work without API
configuration. If you want, you can get
an API and ask follow-ups from Gemini on
how to integrate it to your web page.
Since I'm not planning to integrate an
API for this project, I'm turning back
to the previous design Gemini provided.
By now, Deepseek must have done with the
project. Let's check it out. Of course,
it is finished. We can easily get a
preview of the design by clicking run.
Anyway, let's download this and open it
in a browser.
I can see the Deep Seek 2 have followed
my instructions and added user
experience enhancement like appear
effects, navigation effects, hover
effects, and even scroll effects. And
look here, a form in the contact us
section which no other model had thought
to add.
So far so good. Let's see what DeepS
have done for mobile devices. Well,
well, menu button working smoothly and
the content is intact throughout the
design.
Deepseek is the only model which got
mobile responsibility right on the first
try. Let's have a quick look at the
designs each model built. First model,
chat GPT. Very basic color combinations
and themes. No navigation effects or
mobile responsibility.
Honestly, I expected a more impressive
design from Chat GPT.
Then we have the design clawed built.
Better scroll effects than chat GPT.
Color combinations are also better.
Smooth navigation effects are also
present.
Even though failed on the first try,
Claude designed one of the best mobile
responsive designs, too.
The design Gemini generated have also
used good color combinations and a
modern theme. Smooth effects are also
present on the desktop version, but the
menu button animations did not improve
even in the second design and the
content looks bit empty and less vivid
throughout the design. But that AI
advisor section which Gemini feature
added was impressive. Overall, I think
this design is still better than the one
which chat GPT gave. What do you think?
Finally, we have the last design we
generated using Deepseek. Deepseek also
have used a light theme that aligned
with the instruction I gave and the
content is rich with vivid colors and
images along the design. Effects are
smooth and deepseek have given a lot of
thought about mobile devices. This model
was the only one that delivered the
final content without any flaws or
revisions. And also this was the longest
generation with 1,287
total lines. I will also show the total
content length of other models in a bit.
In fairness, I would say that the pages
which Claude and Deepseek generated are
a lot better than the ones Chat GPT and
Gemini gave. Anyway, the final decision
is yours to make.
So, what do you think? Which design do
you think is the best? Look at this and
you can get a general idea about which
model can handle a bigger task on single
session and which model gives the best
output in a single session. I have
hosted these pages on pixelark.com
website and put the links in the
description below for you to check. I
also have put the source codes on GitHub
and the links for the directory is also
linked to the description below. Go have
a look. You're free to use these source
codes for your projects. Comment down
the model that you think is the best for
web design. See you next time.