---
title: 'Crazy Times'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=8cVSbhPsNzo'
video_id: '8cVSbhPsNzo'
date: 2026-09-11
duration_sec: 751
channel: 'penguinz0'
---

# Crazy Times

> Source: [Crazy Times](https://youtube.com/watch?v=8cVSbhPsNzo)

## Summary

The video is a personal rant that starts with a confession about skipping a shower, then pivots to a critique of the justice system. The creator focuses on a specific case where a mother was punished for letting her child play near a pond, arguing that the judge's decision was unjust and disproportionate.

### Key Points

- **Personal Confession** [00:01] — The creator admits to not showering the previous day, using this as a hook to discuss judgment and hypocrisy.
- **Thought Experiment** [00:45] — The creator reflects on a thought experiment about being taller, which leads to a broader discussion about life and society.
- **Critique of Judges** [08:41] — The creator criticizes judges for making absurd decisions, citing the case of a mother who let her child go to a pond in a gated community.
- **Jesse Butler Case** [09:36] — The creator mentions Jesse Butler, a rapist who received a lenient sentence, contrasting it with the mother's punishment.
- **Judicial Accountability** [10:19] — The creator argues that judges should face consequences for their decisions, just like any other worker.
- **Judge Susan Worthington** [11:11] — The creator calls out the judge, Susan Worthington, for approving the decision, calling it 'disgusting'.
- **Disproportionate Punishment** [11:51] — The creator concludes that the mother's punishment is disproportionate and that the judge should be reprimanded.

## Transcript

Sorry, I can't help myself. You don't even realize it, but you got pranked with a capital P dweeb. You didn't even realize I didn't shower yesterday.
I didn't. And I'm not afraid to say it. I did not shower yesterday. I'm fresh out of the shower now, and you didn't even know. Well, I mean, you knew I was out of the shower now because I'm very sodden.
But you didn't know I didn't shower yesterday. How stupid do you feel? It's okay. It's alright. Sometimes you have to laugh at your own expense. Sometimes you have to say, hey, you got me. And I did. Yeah, I showered just now, obviously using the best soap in the universe, Cheeky Soap.
Use Cheeky, best soap, best deodorant there is. And I couldn't shake a thought. What would life be like if I was taller? An incomprehensible thought experiment.
And when I pondered that, I ended up going in a lot of different directions. and I ended up getting fixated on a story that I had learned about earlier today, one that I didn't really plan on yapping about further, but it just continues to upset me and it continues to just bubble
that now I do want to blabber about it. It's a story about how a mom has been heavily slapped by the legal system and put on the child neglect registry for seven years
for the crime of letting her five-year-old go to a pond without her holding his hand the whole way there. She did what parents used to do, let children go outside to play,
and she just got punished hard. The long dick of the law came in, no lube, raw, and they put her through the paces here, all because she just let her five-year-old go to a pond
in her own neighborhood, by the way, a gated community, by the way, with security that patrols it frequently, by the way, like fucking NPCs. And still, they said you can't do that. And enjoy being on the child neglect registry.
This mom is speaking out after being criminally charged for letting her five-year-old son walk to the park alone. It really was devastating. It just felt like, am I crazy? Terry Ann Parkinson lives in an idyllic gated community in Williamsburg, Virginia, with her husband, Dallin, and five kids.
She says she had just gotten back from a morning stroll when her son Sam asked her if he could go out by himself to collect goose feathers by the nearby pond. What a wholesome request here from the little boy scout.
Wanting to go out there and adventure collecting some goose feathers by the pond. Kind of refreshing to hear that in the midst of how you keep reading about kids being unhealthily addicted to iPads and screens
and how they don't want to go outside or interact with other kids because they'd rather just be inside on, like, Roblox or Doomscrolling. And you hear all the time about people saying, kids need to go outside, that kind of thing.
And then look what happens when the kids go outside. The other neighbors there fucking freak out call the hall monitors the security then elevates it to the next level of law enforcement and then the parent ends up getting charged for allowing the kid to play
outside. And what people were fixating on, and what the community there fixated on, was the fact that the five-year-old wasn't accompanied by a parent. Which, I can understand
being alarming. If it wasn't a fucking gated community with security patrolling around where obviously it wasn't just some reckless decision to let the kid go unsupervised to the pond. When I was five, I was playing outside without my parents out there.
I would go all around the neighborhood with my friends or by myself. It was a totally normal thing. For the longest time, that was like a totally normal act. The point is, that wasn't unusual. And my parents weren't getting fucking flagged down by the neighbors
with pitchforks and garlic like they were hunting vampires or something for this crazy decision to let a child do something without the parent being there. Like, that area I grew up in was safe, so my parents felt confident that it would be safe to do so.
And in the same situation here, it's inside of that gated community with security there. So it wasn't like a super dangerous decision that put the child in jeopardy. And I really just don't understand this thought process,
because children are far more likely to encounter dangerous individuals, specifically predators, online. And I don't see a lot of parents being rounded up and thrown in the slammer for letting their kids have unsupervised access, unfiltered access to the internet
on things like Roblox, which is a cesspool for predators that are constantly, perpetually preying on children. That is far more dangerous, I would argue, than letting your child walk to a pond in your gated community neighborhood.
And if the argument for why it's irresponsible isn't in regards to, like, potential threats like strangers, and it's instead about, like, well, what if the child fell into the water and drowned, and there's no parent there to, like, save them,
well, I don't think that's a super strong argument either, because now it opens up a whole new can of worms. Because it is dangerous, children around bodies of water. A lot of tragedies have happened in those circumstances.
But you know where else tragedies happen? Children in cars. significantly more children are killed in car accidents than they are around bodies of water. Will we then need to start looking at charges for parents that take their kids on car rides,
like driving them to school, driving them to the store, driving them to a friend's house? Because it does put them in danger. Is that a child endangerment charge, potentially? I don't think so, but at the core here, that's kind of a similar argument.
argument. Like, yes, a child around a body of water, you know, something bad could happen, but also something bad could happen on a car ride with a child and a parent going somewhere.
Like, fundamentally, this boils down to a mother trusted their child, probably after, you know, teaching them about, you know, what to do and what not to do while around bodies of water, trusted their child to go collect feathers in their own neighborhood near a pond And I don think it should be a criminal charge and child neglect registry offense for seven years because she allowed her child to go collect those feathers
that's near a pond. In their own gated community neighborhood that has active security personnel patrolling it. And obviously active neighbors too that are, I guess, keeping their eyes peeled at all times.
I don't think there was anything inherently criminal about that. He came out of the garage having put his bike away and he said, Mom, can I go back and get more feathers? And I said, sure, I'm going to go make lunch.
He just goes straight there. Carrie Ann, who just graduated from law school, said she didn't think twice about letting her son make the half-mile trip to the pond because she believed her neighborhood was crime-free. There are roving patrols of security throughout the neighborhood, so it's very safe.
So she was shocked beyond words when a security guard turned up at her front door with Sam in tow. He said that a neighbor had called and said that Sam had been alone and they were worried. And I said, well, you know, he was fine.
And the security guard said, well, he's not allowed to do that. Whew! Thank goodness Paul Blart and the goof troop scooted in here to let them know what they are and are not allowed to do with letting their child go to a pond.
Man, where would we be without that kind of guidance? And luckily, they also took matters into their own hands here to give them a stern talking to an elector while also elevating it to law enforcement to step in here to really punish them for the sadistic act of letting a child play outside and go collect goose feathers by a pond.
Haters. I'm going to call the police. A jury convicted her of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. She was given a suspended six-month jail sentence and was placed on Virginia's child neglect registry for seven years.
When I was found guilty, I was floored. I read information from Inside Edition that is slightly inaccurate. She wasn't convicted, found guilty by a jury. She was convicted by a judge.
So a judge ruled that what she did here was contributing to the delinquency of a minor, and then slapped her with a suspended six-month jail sentence, as well as being on the child neglect registry for seven years.
This is unhinged lunacy. You don't see these clowns moving this hard against, like, actual dangerous people all the time. Take, for example, EDP, someone who has on multiple occasions tried to fuck children,
and even openly brags about wanting to fuck children and attempting to do so. He's not being pursued as hard as this mother was for letting her child go to a pond. That's an actual child predator out there that they're not doing anything about.
But instead, they'll really put the elbow grease behind making sure she gets fucking slammed, absolutely slapped, because she let her child walk to a pond in a gated community. And again, contributing to the delinquency of a minor, I would say that that charge is far more applicable to parents that just sit their children in front of a fucking iPad and let them rot away unsupervised going into who knows where, meaning who knows who on things like Roblox and shit.
I think that far more contributing to a delinquency of a minor than this instance would be but I don see that being levied against any of those parents that just let the fucking internet raise their kids or prey on their kids
It's so outrageous. Like, I've been doing a lot of jibber-jabbering about judges because so many wild cases have been put on my radar. One that I've made a strong mention of multiple times
is Jesse Butler, the rapist, who nearly killed one of his victims, and even filmed as well. Jesse Butler was facing decades, many, many decades behind bars
for all of the sexual assault. And you know what he ended up getting hit with? What a judge deemed, you know, punishment that fits the crime? No jail time and a little community service.
That'll teach him. He'll learn his lesson then. A violent rapist, by the way. The judges are truly out of control. It's unbelievable. This is another one of these things that I just can't comprehend at all.
There needs to be, like, actual repercussions for being bad at their job. Anyone else in society, if you are bad at your job, you're getting fired. Well, not anyone else. A lot of police officers get away with it, too. They just get moved to a different department, paid vacation, that kind of hoopla.
But, like, normal, average civilians, if you are bad at your job, what happens? You get fired. You lose the job. But when you're in positions of power, like a judge, it's like there's nothing you can do that will ever have you, you know, face any kind of punishment.
The law just no longer applies to you, and you get to just bend and break it as much as you want, and come up with these outrageous rulings that are nonsensical and goes against basic human decency,
like in the case of Susan, the judge in Jesse Butler's case. It's just abhorrent. So to see a judge make a ruling like this against a mom who let their child go to a pond in their gated neighborhood, it's just insanity.
Crazy fucking times. And again, I know Judge Susan Worthington wasn't the one who came up with the galaxy brain idea of no jail and just some community service, but she approved it.
She signed off on it. She gave it the big thumbs up from old Susan there. And she didn't have to. She could have turned that shit away. So, yet, it is still another example of a fucking reprehensible judge.
And in this case, I also think the judge needs to be reprimanded. Why are you treating a mother who did nothing wrong, just letting her child go to a pond in their gated communities,
why are you treating her like she's some kind of outrageous criminal for it? you are treating her far more harsh than a lot of actually dangerous, violent, abusive parents get. A lot of those parents don't ever get any real, like, you know, charges or anything.
A lot of that seems to get dismissed for some reason. But here, they're going to play hardball because she just let her kid play outside. It blows my mind. It's something that was just making me upset. The more and more I thought about it.
So I wanted to yap about it a little bit. But anyway, that's about it. See ya. Thank you.