---
title: 'Twitch: stintik ТГ: thestint STINT INSIDE (новости): insidestint #стинт #стинтик #stint #stintik'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=3m3wc3_rl5g'
video_id: '3m3wc3_rl5g'
date: 2026-08-17
duration_sec: 89
channel: 'Нарезки Стинта'
---

# Twitch: stintik ТГ: thestint STINT INSIDE (новости): insidestint #стинт #стинтик #stint #stintik

> Source: [Twitch: stintik ТГ: thestint STINT INSIDE (новости): insidestint #стинт #стинтик #stint #stintik](https://youtube.com/watch?v=3m3wc3_rl5g)

## Summary

The transcript captures a casual, profanity-laden conversation about the speaker's reluctance to engage with advertising, specifically disreputable ads that damage audience trust. The speaker recounts a past experience where they avoided an ad deal by deflecting it to a friend, and discusses the reputational risks of promoting products they have previously criticized, such as the game Warface.

### Key Points

- **Initial Reluctance to Advertising** [00:01] — The speaker mentions being the type who dismisses advertising ('bubu advertising lab') and expresses a long history of being 'messed with' regarding ads.
- **Deflecting the Ad Deal** [00:15] — The speaker describes shifting from a direct refusal to a strategy of blending in, suggesting they would agree only if a friend (Anton) agreed, knowing Anton would never agree, effectively passing the decision to someone else.
- **Transferring Responsibility** [00:42] — The speaker admits to transferring the ad deal to another person, acknowledging the discussion was 'hell' but rationalizing that Anton wouldn't agree anyway.
- **Reputational Advertising Risks** [00:55] — The speaker explains that 'reputational advertising' can cause the audience to turn against the creator, citing an example of advertising for the game Warface, which they had previously trashed in a review.
- **Disreputable Ads and Consequences** [01:22] — The speaker concludes that disreputable advertising is 'the same old crap,' referencing how some ads lead to negative outcomes, metaphorically comparing them to 'Skynet terminators.'

### Conclusion

The speaker's core takeaway is that accepting advertising that contradicts one's public stance can harm audience trust and reputation, leading to a cautious, avoidant approach to such deals.

## Transcript

just [ __ ] [ __ ].  They told me, yes, about advertising, I say, I was literally the type who said: "Yes, about advertising bubu advertising lab."  I don't see anything like that there even so much for me, well, so that you understand how long they’ve been messing with my
brains in this regard.  I'm already from the position of , [ __ ], dude, I don't want to, I moved from that to, you know, trying to blend in, like just from a conversation.  Alya, [ __ ], let's say if that guy agrees, then I'll agree.   And
I pointed at Anton.  Anton, [ __ ], will agree.  I just knew about this, that he would never agree.  I'm like: "Yes, yes, yes, I'll do it like this," [ __ ], so they'll [ __ ] Tokha's brains.  They say, there it was really specific, well, they
[ __ ] my brains, it was just [ __ ] hell.  I just transferred it to another person.  No, what if Anton agreed?  He wouldn't [ __ ] agree.  Who cares?  We discussed this [ __ ] with him in between.  Well, objectively, this advertising is, well,
uh, let's say, disconcerting. Because of reputational advertising - that's something, after which the audience starts to [ __ ] you.  That is, well, for example, advertising was, for example, advertising for the game Warface.  Why?  Because I [ __ ]
trashed Warface, [ __ ] like I was doing a review on Warface, saying it was crap. So for me it's a dissatisfying ad, but that's more because of the local area.  And there is disreputational advertising, basically the same old crap,
because again, somewhere they study, and somewhere, [ __ ] hell, they somewhere, [ __ ] hell, they make Skynet terminators.  Yeah.