[0:00] Hi guys, welcome back to the channel. In
[0:02] today's video, we're going to show you a
[0:03] comparison between Deepseek 3.1 versus
[0:07] GPT 5 Pro model. In our previous video,
[0:10] one of our subscribers commented asking
[0:12] us to create a video on GPT Pro versus
[0:15] Deepseek 3.1. So, here we are with
[0:18] another brand new video. So, let's jump
[0:21] straight into the action. Setting up our
[0:23] coding battle.
[0:25] So here as you can see we have the GPT5
[0:28] Pro model and on the other hand we have
[0:31] DeepSeek V3.1 Deepthink.
[0:35] In this video we're purely going to
[0:36] focus on coding benchmarks. So this is
[0:39] going to be intense.
[0:43] >> Here comes our first prompt. Generate a
[0:46] complete Flappy Bird clone using HTML
[0:49] CSS. include pixel perfect collision
[0:51] detection, smooth animation, score
[0:54] tracking, and sound effects using web
[0:55] audio API. Let's give this prompt to
[0:58] both models and let's see what happens.
[1:00] So, as you can see, DeepSeek started his
[1:02] thinking and GPT Pro is thinking, too.
[1:07] And to my surprise, Deepseek finished
[1:09] his thinking and also started writing
[1:11] code.
[1:13] Sometimes it's fast, too. That's
[1:14] interesting. Okay, now Deepseek is
[1:17] finished. Let's check the code and
[1:19] Here's the game.
[1:22] >> Let's click on start.
[1:24] >> Guys, what the heck? How am I supposed
[1:26] to cross this pipe if there's no gap?
[1:29] >> And also, pixel detection is not
[1:30] working. It's repeatedly showing game
[1:33] over.
[1:35] >> This is not good, Deep Seek. Now, let's
[1:37] check GPT Pro. So, here's the finished
[1:40] code. Let me copy the code and test it.
[1:42] Let's click on start. And yeah, it's
[1:46] working. It's perfectly working. The
[1:48] pipe detection is working accurately.
[1:50] Score function is working too. And it
[1:52] has nice sound effects. Not harsh, not
[1:54] too subtle.
[1:56] >> So overall, it's working perfectly. One
[1:59] point to GPT5 Pro.
[2:06] [Music]
[2:11] >> Test two, snake game challenge. Now,
[2:14] here's our second prompt. Create a
[2:16] modern snake game with neon glowing
[2:18] effects, dynamic grid scaling, multiple
[2:21] difficulty levels, food powerups, smooth
[2:23] snake movement, and gameover animations.
[2:27] Let's send this prompt to both GPT as
[2:30] well as Deepseek model.
[2:32] Okay, so here Deepseek is finished. Let
[2:35] me copy this code and test it. Let's
[2:37] click on start game. And it seems it's
[2:39] not working. Let me click on easy level.
[2:43] Okay, it started working. I think there
[2:45] are some function misalignments, but
[2:47] anyway, let's play this game. Okay, did
[2:49] you guys notice why we got game over
[2:53] H? Okay, I got it. We're getting the
[2:56] same game over again and again. There
[2:59] are some errors and bugs in the code.
[3:01] So, DeepS works, but not fully
[3:03] perfectly. It needs to fix some bugs and
[3:05] then only it can run properly.
[3:08] Now, let's check GPT 5 Pro. So, here's
[3:12] the GPT output. Let me copy the code and
[3:15] test it. We got game over before we even
[3:18] started the game.
[3:20] GPT, you really messed up. Terrible
[3:24] mistake. No buttons are working and the
[3:26] game already started before we even
[3:27] pressed start.
[3:29] >> Deepseek gets one point. At least DeepS
[3:31] was working. Now both models have equal
[3:34] points. Let's move to the next prompt.
[3:38] Generate a cuttingedge portfolio website
[3:40] for a freelance video editor featuring
[3:42] video reels. Showcase with custom video
[3:45] player, before after project
[3:47] comparisons, client testimonials,
[3:50] carousel, timeline of projects, contact
[3:53] form with animation, and parallax
[3:56] scrolling effects.
[3:58] Let's send this prompt to each model.
[3:59] And I'm noticing that today Deep Seek's
[4:01] thinking is very fast. Like it's hardly
[4:04] taking minutes and starting the code. So
[4:07] that's a good point. There's definitely
[4:09] improvement in coding. I can surely say
[4:11] that about Deep Seek. Okay, so Deepseek
[4:14] is finished. Let me copy the code and
[4:16] test it. Here's the website created by
[4:19] DeepSeek model. Looking good. The color
[4:22] theme, animation effects, and it has all
[4:25] the requirements that meet our
[4:26] expectations.
[4:28] There are client testimonials as we
[4:30] asked for and project timeline as well.
[4:33] So, it accurately followed our prompt so
[4:35] well.
[4:37] Good job, DeepSeek. Now, let's test GPT5
[4:40] Pro.
[4:42] Okay, copy the code and let's see the
[4:43] output.
[4:45] >> Okay, guys, first reaction. Wow, the
[4:48] color theme picked by GPT is amazing.
[4:50] Like this blue neon theme giving that
[4:52] tech vibe like it should as this website
[4:55] is designed for a video editor.
[4:58] So, the color theme is excellent and
[5:00] there are video samples which are empty,
[5:02] but they're there. And the project
[5:03] timeline, the project timeline looks
[5:06] good to me. If you look closer, there's
[5:08] slight misalignment. It should be at the
[5:10] center of the line, but anyway. So,
[5:12] there's a contact form with slight
[5:14] animation. Overall, I like the GPT
[5:17] website more than Deepseek. It could be
[5:20] a personal choice, too. Some of you may
[5:22] like the Deepseek website, but for me
[5:24] personally, I'm liking the GPT website.
[5:27] So, GPT gets one more point. Now, GPT is
[5:30] leading in our comparison. Let's move to
[5:32] the next prompt.
[5:35] Test four. Create a high-end shopping
[5:38] website with product filtering system,
[5:40] interactive product viewer, shopping
[5:43] cart with slide out animation, wish list
[5:45] functionality, product zoom on hover,
[5:48] rating system, and checkout process with
[5:50] form validation. You can see we're
[5:52] giving hard and specific functions so
[5:54] that we can see who follows the prompt
[5:56] more accurately.
[5:58] Let's send this prompt to both models.
[6:00] And you can notice DeepSk's thinking is
[6:02] very fast today.
[6:04] I noticed that in coding, especially
[6:06] DeepSeek improved its thinking. Now it's
[6:08] more efficient and faster than the
[6:10] earlier version. Okay, now Deepseek is
[6:13] finished. Let me copy the code and test
[6:15] it. And here's the DeepSseek output. The
[6:19] theme is very generic, very basic
[6:21] website, and product filtering functions
[6:23] are not working very well. None of the
[6:26] buttons are working, so it's just a
[6:27] showpiece, nothing else. DeepSeek
[6:29] disappointed us here. Anyway, let's
[6:32] check GPT5 Pro output. Okay, so here's
[6:35] the code. Let me copy this and check.
[6:39] And now this is the website generated by
[6:41] GPT5 Pro. And I must say this looks
[6:43] good. No joke. The filtering functions
[6:47] are working perfectly. Quick view is
[6:49] also working and add to cart is fully
[6:52] functional.
[6:54] >> So GPT really put some effort here and
[6:56] made it functional as well as we wanted.
[6:58] So one point to GPT again.
[7:01] Now GPT is two points ahead of Deepseek.
[7:04] Let's give our next prompt.
[7:08] >> Test five. Generate a comprehensive
[7:10] business dashboard showing AI
[7:12] development metrics, profit analysis,
[7:15] growth charts using chartjs, animated
[7:18] counters, and real time data simulation.
[7:20] Okay, this is a bit harder than the
[7:22] earlier ones. Now let's send this prompt
[7:24] to both models. While deepseek is
[7:26] finished, let's test it.
[7:30] Okay, this time DeepSeek excelled at
[7:32] this. It's updating in real time and the
[7:35] UI is looking good to me, but there's a
[7:37] bug I noticed. It keeps updating in real
[7:39] time, but there's no function to handle
[7:41] long earlier data, which is making the
[7:43] website length keep going on and on. But
[7:46] overall, this website is looking good.
[7:49] Now, let's test GPT 5 Pro output. And
[7:52] here's the output. And GPT again messed
[7:55] up this. The UI looks terrible with no
[7:58] functions at all. There's nothing to
[7:59] watch. Okay, let's give the point to
[8:01] DeepSeek. Now, Deepseek is only one
[8:04] point behind GPT. What do you think,
[8:07] guys? Will Deepseek overtake GPT5 Pro
[8:10] here? Comment down below your
[8:12] predictions, and those who accurately
[8:14] predict will get a shout out in the next
[8:16] upcoming video. Test six, cryptotracking
[8:19] website. Okay, so here's our next
[8:20] prompt. Build a cryptotracking website
[8:22] with real-time price updates,
[8:24] interactive candlestick charts,
[8:26] portfolio calculator, price alert
[8:29] system, and animated price change
[8:31] indicators with color coding. Let's send
[8:33] this prompt to Deepseek as well as GPT5
[8:36] Pro. Okay, Deepseek is finished. Let me
[8:40] copy the code and run this. And here's
[8:42] the output. It's looking good with all
[8:44] the functions we expected. There are
[8:46] price alerts and portfolio and
[8:48] candlestick charts. And the UI is
[8:50] overall looking good. Now let's test GPT
[8:53] 5 Pro. Okay, so copy this code and
[8:56] here's the output.
[8:58] GPT, what happened to you, boy? This is
[9:00] what they call
[9:02] >> Well, let's just say it looks very bad
[9:04] and unorganized and it's not even
[9:06] finished properly. Deep Seek again. Got
[9:08] this point. Now Deepseek and GPT are at
[9:12] the same point. Now let's give the final
[9:14] prompt and we'll know who will be the
[9:16] winner of this video. Deepseek 5 3.1 or
[9:20] GPT 5 Pro. Final test 3D solar system.
[9:24] Here's our last prompt. Generate an
[9:26] interactive 3D solar system using CSS 3D
[9:30] transforms in JavaScript. Include
[9:32] realistic planet orbits, clickable
[9:34] planets with information panels, zoom in
[9:36] and zoom out functionality with planet
[9:38] rotation animation. Let's give this
[9:40] prompt to both models. Okay, Deep Seek
[9:42] is finished. Let me copy the code and
[9:45] test it. And here's the output.
[9:48] The sun looks good, but the planets are
[9:50] kind of strange.
[9:51] We have zoom in andout features as well
[9:54] as a reset button. And the planet
[9:56] clickable function is not working, but
[9:58] overall it's looking decent.
[10:01] Now, let's test GPT5 Pro Code. Let me
[10:06] copy the code. And here's the output.
[10:09] This looks much better than DeepSeek for
[10:11] sure. The sun looks good here. and
[10:13] planet visuals are better than deepseek.
[10:16] It also has zoom in andout features and
[10:18] has asteroids in the outer layers. And
[10:21] one more thing this has is the planet
[10:23] clickable function which shows the
[10:24] information of that planet when you
[10:26] hover over it.
[10:28] So guys, I think GPT5 Pro clearly gets
[10:31] the point here. Final verdict and
[10:34] conclusion, GPT5 Pro model wins this
[10:37] test by one point. Deepseek is very
[10:40] cost- effective and in terms of value
[10:41] for money and effectiveness, Deepseek
[10:43] will win. But in this pure coding test,
[10:46] GPT won this time. Both models are great
[10:48] at coding and sometimes Deepseek is
[10:50] better than GPD5 Pro. But if you really
[10:53] ask me who's the winner, then I would
[10:55] say both are winners. But for today's
[10:57] video, in terms of benchmarking, GPT5
[11:01] Pro is the winner of this video. GPT5
[11:04] Pro sometimes gives exceptional
[11:07] front-end code that looks very good
[11:08] compared to Deepseek's basic generic
[11:11] websites that look very plain sometimes.
[11:13] For the next video, do comment below
[11:16] which model you want to test next. I'm
[11:18] thinking of bringing Claude 4.1 Opus
[11:21] thinking model and Kimmy model 2 for our
[11:23] next videos. Do let me know your
[11:25] thoughts. On this note, let's end this
[11:27] video here. If you haven't subscribed
[11:30] already, then subscribe to our channel.
[11:32] Many exciting videos are coming very
[11:34] soon. Thanks for watching and I'll see
[11:36] you in the next one.
[11:41] >> Through the wastelands, through the
[11:43] highways, till my shadow turns the sun
[11:46] raise. And on we
[11:51] [Music]