--- title: 'СТИНТ РАСКРИТИКОВАЛ КИНОПОИСК за НАКРУТКУ ОЦЕНОК РУССКИМ ФИЛЬМАМ' source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=2sAADfuyyME' video_id: '2sAADfuyyME' date: 2026-08-17 duration_sec: 1876 channel: 'Нарезки Стинта' --- # СТИНТ РАСКРИТИКОВАЛ КИНОПОИСК за НАКРУТКУ ОЦЕНОК РУССКИМ ФИЛЬМАМ > Source: [СТИНТ РАСКРИТИКОВАЛ КИНОПОИСК за НАКРУТКУ ОЦЕНОК РУССКИМ ФИЛЬМАМ](https://youtube.com/watch?v=2sAADfuyyME) ## Summary The video is a critical analysis of Kinopoisk ratings for Russian films, highlighting suspicious rating inflation and the disconnect between high scores and box office performance. The creator examines several films, noting that many with high ratings have low box office receipts and few reviews, suggesting possible manipulation. The video also touches on the role of the Russian Cinema Fund and the lack of advertising for these films. ### Key Points - **Initial Observation** [00:10] — The creator explores Kinopoisk for 2026 films and notices that the majority of films are Russian, with some like 'The Frog Princess' having a 7/10 rating, which he finds surprising given the quality. - **Kolobok Rating Surge** [01:19] — Kolobok has a rating of 2.9 with almost half a million ratings, despite empty halls. The creator questions how this is possible and suspects manipulation. - **Rating Discrepancies** [02:40] — There is a difference of three to four points between Kinopoisk and IMDb ratings for Russian films, which the creator finds significant and suspicious. - **Positive vs Negative Ratings** [03:36] — When Kolobok received negative ratings, Kinopoisk removed them for suspected cheating, but when positive ratings came in, no such action was taken, which the creator finds inconsistent. - **Angels of Ladoga** [05:00] — A war film with a $5 million box office in Russia, 160,000 ratings on Kinopoisk, but only 118 ratings on IMDb with a 5.0 score. The budget was 750 million rubles with state funding. - **Dr. Gough** [08:15] — Dr. Gough raised almost a million dollars at the box office but had a budget of 315 million rubles, failing to break even despite having a high rating of 8 on Kinopoisk. - **High Ratings, Low Reviews** [11:08] — Films like Dr. Gough have 60,000 ratings but only one critic review, which the creator finds odd and indicative of possible rating manipulation. - **Kuzya's Success** [15:59] — Kuzya has a box office of over 902 million rubles with a budget of 175 million, making it a successful film, but it has only two reviews despite 200,000 ratings. - **Three Strange Patterns** [21:45] — The creator notes three suspicious patterns: similar ratings across films, few reviews despite high ratings, and box office receipts close to the amount of state funding. - **Marketing Strategy** [24:25] — The creator suggests that marketers may be creating high ratings and reviews to create an illusion of popularity, rather than investing in advertising. - **Comparison with Cheburashka** [25:51] — Cheburashka was a hit, and the creator suggests that instead of funding failures, the film industry should follow that successful model and make good products. - **Kolobok's Rating Rise** [28:35] — Kolobok's rating has risen to 5.7 with 430,000 ratings, despite empty halls, which the creator finds impossible without manipulation. ### Conclusion The creator concludes that Kinopoisk ratings for Russian films are likely manipulated, with high scores not reflecting actual popularity or box office success. He calls for transparency and better marketing strategies in the Russian film industry. ## Transcript Yesterday, just out of curiosity, I decided to pop into Kinopapp and, well, I decided to sort it out, you know, using Kinopoisk. I decided to sort by Kinopoisk, dear friends. See what cool movies came out. This is how it is happening right now before your eyes. Only I chose the year 2026. Well, because it’s interesting what happened in 1926. I would like to see it. And I was surprised that if you look at the Kinopoisk rating on Kinopab, the overwhelming majority of films are Russian, and, for example, something like The Frog Princess even has a 7 out of 10. And this was surprising to me, considering that I was watching this, well, piece of [ __ ] crap. An amazing amazing situation, amazing amazing situation, dear friends. Uh, but if the films that have seven points, they are at least somewhere something Wait, how much will fire Zhora? Seven points. Look, in short, what a joke. In comparison, here you see three ratings. The first is the site rating. Well, that is, roughly speaking, who liked this site or what rating it received. Second - IMDb. Third - Kinopoisk. And anyway, why did I decide to speed this up? The thing is that yesterday we discussed the so -called kolobok, yes, the fact that he has -called kolobok, yes, the fact that he has one point there, and you will be surprised, but he has more than one point. At this very second, Kolobok already has 2.9 and almost half a million ratings. And this is on condition that the halls are empty. How did half a million, let's be honest, another 300,000 ratings. [ __ ] knows. I have no idea. Well, I had a sneaking suspicion that somewhere in Penzi there was a movie theater that was in high demand for Koloblopok. Penza guys, please tell us, because we are all interested, it would explain a lot. And [snorts] at that second I'm like: "[ __ ], is this really the kind of [ __ ] that's happening to all of our cinema on Kinopoisk?" Well, let's notice one thing right away. Of course, of course, the player is better. Why have over 5 million users realized that secure transactions, commission-free Steam top-ups with on-screen promo codes, and thousands of products are more than just words? We have everything for games, for studying, for relaxing without limits. Look carefully. Items, donations, battle passes, in-game currency, Telegram stars, neural networks, and music at the best prices. Check it out yourself. If it's profitable, then it's a player. A difference in grades of three or even four points is a lot. Even our foreign points is a lot. Even our foreign equivalent, where they don't like us very much, dear friends, because, well, you know, cinema is not outside of politics, so they dislike it 100%, because it's Russian, of course, naturally. And there are also fewer ratings there. Well, that's clear, dear friends. It's clear Kinopoisk. This is initially because these are niche films for our for example, Dr. Gaff, which we have eight of on Kinopoisk. Let's look there, for example, at IMDb, how much does Dr. Gaff have on IMDb? This is interesting. If it loads for me at all, of course, ah, 50 ratings, you understand, right? That's obvious. Obviously, Dr. Gaff has a lot more on Kinopoisk. But, in my opinion, even with such a sample, the question arises: "Why is the difference so [ __ ] big? Not one, not two points, but [ __ ] four. And that's it. Kolobok, when in a couple of days we get 30,000 ratings, which . And this explains why the rating has already risen to three. This is it calculate what they roughly give it, if each of you gave it one, and now it's give it, see what rating they are trying to give it. Here. Uh, I doesn't pay attention to this, to such an influx of positive ratings and notice, here's an interesting [ __ ], when there was an influx of negative ratings, Kinopoisk noticed it and, in order to scold them for cheating, well, to check for cheating, removed the ratings. But when the positive ratings started coming in, For some reason, no one is going to remove the rating. Or check for cheating, either. [ __ ], it's weird [ __ ], incomprehensible, but oh well, it happens. But we're well, it happens. But we're not going to talk here about why, uh, why they show it there, who does it and why. We don't give a [ __ ]. I suggest watching these trailers of these [ __ ] awesome movies and also reviews on Kinopoisk, because, well , guys, just in case, it's almost the same as with the project The End of the World, you know? What if , what if the Americans are just evil, envious people? It's the same, envious people who give three stars. I also think they're evil, envious people. Let's watch Angels of Ladoga. So, what do we have here, dear ones? And this is a film about World War II, dear friends. A war film. A Wait, here Look, you open Angels of here Look, you open Angels of Ladoga, 71 dislikes. They're just [ __ ] jealous people. You open it on Kinopoisk and see that you're having VPN problems. I this film a thumbs down... I wonder, by the way, what it's got. So, the box office in Russia is $5 million, my dear friends. $5 million, expensive box office in Russia. For those who don't know, 160,000 ratings. Wonderful. By the way , what's it got on MDB? 118 ratings and five points. Well, [ __ ] hell, they just didn't appreciate it properly. The [ __ ] West, scum, scum, scum, dear friends, by the way, I wonder, what's the budget for this film? 750 million rubles. State funding. Who would have thought, [ __ ] hell? Well, because I think if it's state funding, then, well, the film can't be a failure, right? So who would have, who would have we have here in the trailer? Vetrov and Golov are walking next to each other, close. Maybe they are really good? Without any extras. Leningrad 1941. Fire, fire. allow heavy equipment to deliver cargo, evacuate people. A decision has been made to use iceboats. They can carry up to 10 people and cargo. The sailor arrived by the wind, your order. I'm with a shot. don't know, it looks cool in the trailer. I don't know what people didn't like at the movie pub . On [music], I think there are envious people. The trailer looks really, well, absolutely stunning. Dear friends, they are using sailboats. Just look at his face. Well, you can tell right away, man. What an actor. Respect to the actor. Immersed himself. Immersed himself. He played. Now I look at his face and I'm filled with hatred. I can just see a real hatred. I can just see a real fascist in him. Well, I want to. fascist in him. Well, I want to. Vovorot. even saves the woman, pinning her down. There. That's real. That's ours, ours, ours. Dear friends, 1 million viewers. Box office in Russia. By the way, I wonder, wait a minute, By the way, I wonder, wait a minute, how much is the box office? 5 million dollars? [ __ ], what? Guys, 400,000. It didn't break even, it turns out. It turns out it didn't break even. Eh, it almost reached the amount of state funding from the budget, but, well, more precisely, it did reach the amount that was given by state funding . But, unfortunately, unfortunately, unfortunately, probably not. Probably not. Probably not, dear friends. But it was close. Why? Eight points, basically. I'm sure it's really good there. World War II, there, let's watch something more specific, like Dr. Gough. Dr. Gough, dear friends, just in case you're wondering, the box office, guys. Dr. Gough raised, if anyone's interested, almost a million dollars. Yes, Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. And the film's budget was 315 million. [ __ ], it didn't break even again. What the [ __ ] is this? Another film that has almost more than an eight and doesn't break even. Yeah, yeah, yeah, dear people, go see Russian cinema. Come on, look how it pulls it off. What [ __ ] ratings? Come on, go [ __ ] yourself. Let's because, well, this is, I don't know, this is, in my opinion, disrespectful. Dr. Woof trailer. And, have you noticed, all our Russian films have eight points. Eight points. Eight points. Only the brownie Kuzya [ __ ] up a little. 7.8, [ __ ]. And the [sighs] The Green Mile has exactly the same rating talking about. And the Green Mile, It probably paid off. And then, well, guys, well, support domestic cinema. Watch it. Now I'll show you the trailer for go see it. Are you ready? He likes different music. Chocolate is poison for a dog. [music] She's going to die. She's going to die. [screaming] dog? Enormous amounts of money for animal testing. Dogs are being kidnapped in this city. Dogs are being kidnapped in this city. Science is worth suffering for. Okay then . I have my own people among the animals. How do you talk to animals? What about penalties? You were still drinking water from a puddle this morning, and already in football analytics this evening. What are our daughters roses? Ridiculous. [laughter] Ridiculous. We'll never find them. We'll find them. A man is a dog's friend. A man is a dog's friend [music] everyone knows that. [music] everyone knows that. And what's that song in the background? Oh, two evil [music] creatures Haha. huh? Just passing. I don't know. I watch this trailer, and I immediately understand that this is an eight. That's 100% points. [music] I also Attention. In general, I think that you shouldn't mince words, but give it a nine. My last name is Gaff. These are your friends, aren't they? Well, not exactly. They are from a different area. And this, my dear friends, is 60,000 ratings given that the film didn't really make much money, you know? It flopped at the box office. That's what I adore, in support our domestic cinema, even given the fact that, well, they are not interested in watching the film, they come and give it a high rating. For this, for this, I have enormous respect to them, truly. I don't know how we would live in this world without them. Look, Kolobok, look, Kolobok has almost half a million Kolobok has almost half a million ratings now. The cinemas are empty, but they rate them and raise the ratings because, damn, these [ __ ] young people have watched too much of the West, YouTube, and all these stupid streamers who talk nonsense, [ __ ], and only a few insisted. At least normal people have something in their heads, and they're bringing justice back to the Kinopoisk platform. God bless them, really. What's interesting is that in the reviews they write: "Only one review, yeah, [ __ ] rubbish." How is one review? I do n't understand. This is such a hit. This is such a hit. 60,000 ratings and one film critic review. OK. What did he film critic review. OK. What did he write? What did he write? Here is Aragorn, see? Aragorn 1978. They wrote something to him. No, 11 people. I don’t know, they’re talking some kind of [ __ ] . It seems that opinion is divided. This is an amazing film about animals, children and vets. I am absolutely delighted with the plot. The main characters here are animals. Russia finally has its own Russian Doctor Dolittle. I still felt in the nineties from watching the film Doctor Dolittle. It's good that the director of consumables took a proven scheme and made a powerful project. Sergey Gormash plays a veterinarian. His doctor is disillusioned with people and seeks support from animals. This is a really powerful movie, guys. Well, he wrote powerfully twice. Well, can we not trust him after this? Well, have you often heard people use the word powerful twice in a row? This is [ __ ] powerful. Come on, this is powerful. This movie put a smile on my face. After all, the trio of actors Gormash, Alisa Rudenko and Irina Rozanova, provide many funny and kind moments. It's not just a funny and kind moments. It's not just a comedy, he's also kind. Here are animals and birds dogs, shown through human understanding. The director of expendables brought human love to our smaller brothers. This is a hymn to human kindness. Gormage revealed himself here 100%. The girl Marina, played by Alisa Rudenko, is a symbol of all children who cannot live without pets. The cameraman deserves credit for capturing the habits of Good doctor. These are gymnasiums. Anyway, by the way, is, well, I’m not sure of course, but I just want to check. Checking for texts. Well, like, [ __ ], I'm just curious, I'm just curious. Well, I just person. In fact, it is written as if in a human language. [ __ ], no idea, [ __ ], wanted to [ __ ]. Okay, okay, okay. We forgive, we forgive, we forgive. And here, [ __ ] hell, there's anlac. The man wrote. [ __ ], sad, sad, sad. I wanted to [ __ ], but it didn't work. Well, I don't know. Dr. Gav did an excellent job. Let's have some other masterpiece. Here, Children of the Forest 2. By the way, Children of the Forest 2 is even rated quite well on the website. That is, 5.7 is more than Ladega's angels. Seven turns before Dawn and Dr. Gough, respectively. That is to say, in general this film is actually quite good. So, what's our budget here? So, the worldwide box office is our budget here? So, the worldwide box office is $12 million, by the way. By the way, the box office receipts in Russia are 22 million rubles. Wait, so this is world cinema, dear friends, or what? There's something I can't understand. Or is this not even our film? Ah, this is ours, this is ours, this is ours, this is ours, this is ours. 60,000 ratings again, damn. Here we are for the second time in a row, again 60,000 ratings. How does it work? It's as if the same people are, well, go down even better than that one. No, the production budget is not officially stated. What do you mean not specified? In terms of? The worldwide box office is $11 million, so, then perhaps he has a lot on MDB . No, IMDb. This is world cinema. On MDB it has 200 ratings of 5.3. Yeah, [ __ ], underestimated again. If there were 10 thousand there , there would be eight again. And this is Germany, [ __ ] hell. Why the [ __ ] is that? Okay, let's forget it. Well, well, it looks real, I swear. One to one. Let's move on. Kuzya. And so, it was rated normally. That's why the IMDb and Kkiopp ratings here are . Wait, then why is his grade so crap? This is what interests me. And how much time did the first part get? The first part, b is also 7.5. Moreover, the fees are even lower. As I understand it, this is that very friendly project, right? OK. OK. Brownie, Kuzya. Fees. Budget fees. So, guys, the box office Budget fees. So, guys, the box office receipts are over 902 million rubles, if anyone is interested. Can I find out the film's budget? Budget 175 million. Oh, wait, what background did the [ __ ] give the movie? Or won't they write it here? [ __ ], they don't write here, as if. Well, guys, this is a successful film, if anyone is interested. This is if anyone is successful. I wonder what his grades are? Wait, 200,000 ratings, guys, Wait, 200,000 ratings, guys, 200,000, dear friends. 200 grand in the 8.2 on Interstellar. I don't think this movie is on the level of Interstellar. I think you're jealous. By the way, Kuzya 3 will be released soon. By the way, it is exactly 1 point better than the previous part, which has 670 ratings and which... Why the fees? The first part and the second are no different, but the first part has 600,000 700,000 ratings and seven reviews. Wait, for example, I’ll find there, Spider-Man, but not a new day, because a new day, as I understand it, also has... come out here yet. It already has 14 reviews from critics, and you have seven out of 600,000, that is 80,000 ratings for Spider-Man versus 200 for Kuzya and 700 for the first part. Well, if we take a film, for example, which was released last year, let's say. Are you kidding me? [ __ ]. Hello. This is how we like to say things on Twitch. Why is the chat inactive? Like 5,000 online, but the chat is silent, as we like to say. Okay then . What do we have here? Let's see what 7.8 points are here. Kuzma, before you is the hunger of Koschei the Deathless himself. Ugh, how disgusting. If she falls into his hands, the power of the evil ruler will be reborn. Got the one who got away from the spoon. adventures. Baba Yaga is now watching over us. crime here. Boogers. you, winged bread-eater. Who has always found friendship with Kolobok a dusty affair? The moons will quickly and amicably clean everything up. Drive away the trash . What is this? This is Oh, what a quiet little tangled thing. But I will call you Quiet. Got hungry on the road. Come on . . What a beauty. n't you get the feeling that even in the video I ordered from Shade, which was intentionally made, well, a little crooked, the graphics are better than here. [ __ ], crooked, the graphics are better than here. [ __ ], I think [music] Just a reminder, one Doshirak is not financed by the state. Who do you want to punish, Your Highness? What the [ __ ]? What the [ __ ]? One little brownie. Kuzya [screams] Koschei is coming after me. Koschei is coming after me. Oh, trouble, trouble. Should what are you doing here? I'm not Chernomor, I'm a cryptocurrency enthusiast. Are I'm not Chernomor, I'm a cryptocurrency enthusiast. Are you casting a spell on me? into the dead. Ugh, about the cars. Sergey Burunov. Oh, my little cakes. Karik Harla. Okay, cool, cool, dear friends. You can see it right away, you can see it's a masterpiece right away. 7,8. I really want to go see this movie . What others are there? Adventures of the Yellow Suitcase. Seven. Again seven points under eight. What is the points under eight. What is the adventure of the yellow suitcase? 72,000 ratings. [ __ ], why do they always get the same grades? That is, [ __ ] hell, people are putting up the following: "Gross revenue in Russia: $1 million ." So, [ __ ], why do n't you have something like a brownie there called Kuzya? How was Dr. Gav, huh? The one with even lower fees, or whatever his name was? Woof, I think, huh? Doctor Woof. Ah, although no, it is logical. No, no, by the way, I'm lying, that's logical. This is logical. 800,000 and 1,200. Look. This is logical in principle. This is logical in principle . Although the ratings are the same, which is illogical. Well, in principle, 5,000 is probably logical. And he also has eight. So it's Yes, I think it's logical. Yes, I think that makes sense. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes , yes, yes, yes. And if we foreign, well, or other films, about which we are more or less sure, or this one , remember, which I just got confused, Children of the Forest. The children of the forest are there, the forest. Wait, there he had estimates like No, not Well, they have , damn, more, but they have collected in the world . In their world, you understand, dear friends, here it’s a little different. Although, yes, it is a little strange that there are 50,000 ratings, and at the same time they collected 12 million in the world, and here we have 300,000. Well, even if we translate it into the fact that little is known about it in our region, it still has ratings about the same as the yellow suitcase and Dr. Gaff, but the box office receipts are four times less than how it works. Does logic. There's something I don't understand. I don't understand something. And how much is the understand something. And how much is the budget for this? 250 million rubles. 100 million rubles The sum is non-refundable, and box office receipts are approximately 90 million rubles. Why all the time, well, in short, I don’t know, it’s just that maybe I’m schizoid, but don’t you think that three things are very strange. The first thing is that they have approximately the same grades, more or less. But for some reason no one writes reviews with so many ratings. And where there are, uh, resources from the film fund, the box office receipts are incredibly close to this number, precisely to the resources from the film fund. These three things confuse me greatly . I don't understand, like, what kind of joke is this. That is to say, this film, well, this film was a literal failure. Well, by the way, this movie is a failure, it was a failure, but it has a ton of ratings. How does it work? Please explain to me why Kinopoisk is not doing anything about this . But at the same time, when Kolobok started getting bombarded with reviews, they were like, "Should we cut off the satik for a second or not? We have to cut it off. Why not?" What else is there? Wait for something interesting. Cinderella. Secrets of the three cartoons. Did you know that, well, this year, if anything, Disney sucked dick, because there is Cinderella, The Secret of the Three Brides. 20,000 ratings, guys, in case you didn't know. This is some kind of masterpiece of a cartoon . Budget 300,000 rubles, fees in Russia 200,000 dollars. A score of 7.6 and zero reviews, by the way, is also a very important zero reviews, by the way, is also a very important point. And on MDB 5.2 the score is 300 lyams. Oh, yes, 300 million rubles. How much the [ __ ]? 300 million rubles budget. I'm sorry, I'm stupid. I wonder what's going on with the film fund? Yes, yes, yes, yes. No, no, there is no film fund. Ah, yes, of course, of course, of course, of course. Guys, the amount from the cinema fund is 100 million rubles. Support for domestic animation. Supported another failure. [ __ ]. [ __ ], what confuses me most is how many films our film fund supports. And for some reason, all the most [ __ ] successful films in terms of ratings are flops. At the same time, let's be honest, no one knows about them. No, [ __ ], no joke. Did you know that Dr. Gough, you guys knew Dr. Gough until today? No, most likely not. The Adventure of the Yellow Suitcase, most likely not. Kuzya, well, Kuzya, okay. Kuzya was most likely known because, in my opinion, this comedian, or someone else, filmed a movie about him. In short, I saw this from reviews, for example. Uh, Cinderella, no, 76 points. Here. Angels of Ladoga and Seven Miles Before Dawn. This is obviously about war films in World War II, which, as I understand it, also passed you by. How does it work? The fact that the coolest films, according to ratings on something like Kinopoisk, they, well, fly past us, it turns out. And it would seem that since it flies past us, then there probably shouldn’t be any fees, but for some reason they do. And they are reviewed, but for some reason no one knows. How does this not work? I'm just curious. You need to invest in advertising, bro. Why the [ __ ] do they need a million ratings on Kinopoisk? They don't have any advertising, just in case, 100,000 , who can't do that much today, they've already [ __ ] that even if I watch this film, it’s unlikely to get eight stars. feels like ours No, I saw that Mizulina posted the joke here. And something just tells me that some of our marketers think that if they create high ratings and reviews of quantities and create the illusion of popularity, then in our heads everything about our cinema is [ __ ] awesome. Well, no, the question arises, why the [ __ ] directors who, like, can't make a good movie, instead of, like, going to see the guys who work in film in India, you know, they make niche films there, comedies with much smaller budgets, but good films, you know? Why the [ __ ] take directors, actors who are no longer of interest to anyone, take simply disgusting scripts and from the very beginning release a [ __ ] failure, uh, film, if it is possible, well, for example, to try and give a chance to, well, those same young people. [ __ ], we even have stories abroad that, uh, are working [ __ ] great right now this year with the just took some guys from YouTube, they dragged them in and made some huge hits, and the box office is like this. There was no money there, but here we had Cheburashka, damn it. Eh, what a but here we had Cheburashka, damn it. Eh, what a [ __ ] hit. Cool, awesome. Yo, holy [ __ ]. Cheburashka became a hit. So, [ __ ], follow the same scenario, make a good product, not a conveyor belt one. What's the [ __ ] problem? I don't understand. And here the film fund invests 100 million, 500 million in each one. But we don’t know about these films. Opening film search. The reviews are these films is a failure. I mean, well, [ __ ], no joke. Each of these films, check in a moment, Kuzya. Two. Just a second. , I failed too. Now 180 rubles. Budget. No, the brownie Kuzya didn't fail. He has 900 million rubles, dear friends. Brownie Kuzya didn't fail. But for some [ __ ] reason, his grades are some weird [ __ ]. Two reviews. He has a collection of a billion. But wait, what the [ __ ], his collection is a billion. Two reviews. How? How does this work? Explain the logic to me, please. What other awesome films do we have, dear friends? The Frog Princess 2, 230 million rubles. Box office receipts: 340 million. Well, by the way, also a failure, by the way. It should be bought twice as much , if anything. And there's government support 230. And this is also a film that's So interesting. So what's the rating here then? 200,000 ratings. [ __ ], how is it that Kuzya the Second, with the same statistics that showed three times the box office receipts, shows an even worse stat on Kinopoisk ? [ __ ], he has two reviews, the ratings are identical. How the [ __ ] does this happen? Or maybe Kuzya's fans just don't watch, well, Kinopoisk, they don't rate it, but jealous frogs rate it strongly. How does this happen? It's not clear, it's not clear, it's not clear, it's not clear, it's not clear, dear friends. It's not clear, it's not clear. But, judging left, I assume that the film is really not bad. 300,000 ratings, 18 reviews. [ __ ], wait, there's something here that smells alive. Just a second. At least there's a smell of something alive here. So, the total budget is 800 million rubles under the film fund. So, how much are the fees? 3 million dollars. Failure. Another failure. Well, at least there's more life here, apparently . Although, well, I think you also at least, yes, here at least there are more living things. At least some our websites. And in general, Kinobaba got a plus-minus rating. Well, it's normal, compared to many other films in the top most brutal ones. Here. Why does this film have a million box office receipts in Russia with 8,000 ratings, while others have 3 [ __ ] million box office receipts with 200,000 ratings? How the [ __ ] does this work? I'm just curious how the [ __ ] this works. I don't understand at all, [ __ ] hell. Even if you kill me. Kolobok. Rating 5.7. Gingerbread Man, wait. What about Kolobok? What's there? Guys, remember, tomorrow it will already be 3.5 here. Just a reminder, when they started bombing reviews, reminder, when they started bombing reviews, there were 150,000 ratings. There are already 430 here now. And that's assuming that, [ __ ] hell , Kolobok has empty halls. Even if you take into account that some people go there just for fun, to troll, there just for fun, to troll, it still, well, it doesn’t matter at all. Well, grades can't just jump up like that . But I suspect, in short, that it is, well, it is obvious, dear friends. Oh, by the way, there's one on MDB, guys. There are about interested. But this is [ __ ] again, because there are more on Kinopoisk, so friends, of course, of course, you can’t compare it with MDB, because there are few ratings there. Naturally, naturally, naturally, it's understandable. Well, uh, I have a suspicion that Kinopoisk, uh, doesn’t spin it itself. I have a suspicion films they show. This, by the way, explains why they troll here, for example, with these recommendations for Spider-Man, with the design change for the Emergency. They just, well, like, tell them: “Well, you didn’t pay attention that your grades would go up, so enjoy it.” They're like, "Okay, okay." Because I never believe in life that searching does not notice this. And this story with the film's rating with "You'll like this Rolling Stone" essentially just proves that you, but we can't, like, well, you know, yes, we can't, we can't." This is the situation. Therefore, specifically for Kinopoisk, there is everyone understands perfectly well that the guys were simply taken by the balls, most likely. But the funny thing is that this year we really have a huge number of world-famous films that, for some [ __ ] reason, nobody is discussing in the world. What kind of world don't we discuss about Dr. Gough, damn it. Doctor, [ __ ] waffle. This is total [ __ ]. It's just Dr. Gough. Eight points. How does this happen? Explain to me that our top films , except for Kuzya, somehow paid for themselves, dear friends, in the Cheburashka format. Well, they couldn’t somehow draw up fees or anything like that there. Well, obviously, everyone watched Kuzya. Each Well, the question arises, how is it that our coolest films, which have the greatest number of ratings, are simply amazing. By the way, this Angel Lagoda or whatever this film is called, has about the same ratings as Kuzya. But at the same time, Angels of Lagda is a failure, and Kuzya is not. How does this happen? [ __ ], that's also an interesting question. All good movies fail, you know? Well, what can you do, damn it, what can you do? You wanted Slaby [music] night wai. I thought I had found my [music] paradise. Well then why are you so lonely? You wanted to run city. [music]