---
title: 'Europe Just Made Tether Illegal for 40 Million People!'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=Vj-1qr9QOcU'
video_id: 'Vj-1qr9QOcU'
date: 2026-08-04
duration_sec: 950
---

# Europe Just Made Tether Illegal for 40 Million People!

> Source: [Europe Just Made Tether Illegal for 40 Million People!](https://youtube.com/watch?v=Vj-1qr9QOcU)

## Summary

The video explains how Europe's MiCA regulation effectively forced Tether's USDT off regulated platforms, culminating in Revolut automatically converting users' USDT to fiat by August 31st. It details the regulatory mechanics, Tether's strategic exit, the rise of compliant alternatives like USDC, and the broader geopolitical implications for stablecoin markets.

### Key Points

- **Revolut's forced USDT conversion** [00:00] — On August 31st, 40 million Revolut users in Europe will have their USDT automatically converted to fiat at market rate, regardless of authorization. This applies to the entire European Economic Area plus Switzerland.
- **Timeline of Revolut's delisting** [01:04] — Revolut announced the delisting on July 3rd, stopped USDT buys on July 6th, stopped deposits on July 30th, and full delisting with auto-conversion on August 31st.
- **MiCA prohibits offering unauthorized e-money tokens** [01:38] — Under MiCA, a licensed CASP cannot offer e-money tokens whose issuer isn't in the authorized register. Tether isn't registered, so Revolut had to delist USDT.
- **Self-custody and P2P remain legal** [01:54] — MiCA does not make holding USDT illegal. Self-custody and peer-to-peer transfers are unaffected. The regulation governs venues and issuers, not possessions.
- **Tether's reason for not applying: 60% reserve requirement** [02:28] — To be authorized as a significant e-money token issuer, Tether would have to park 60% of reserves as deposits in EU commercial banks. Tether's CEO called this dangerous, citing credit risk and uninsured exposure.
- **Silicon Valley Bank example** [03:19] — In March 2023, Circle had $3.3 billion of USDC reserves stuck in SVB, causing USDC to briefly trade at $0.87. This illustrates the risk of bank deposits.
- **Tether's audit and strategic choice** [04:00] — Tether engaged a Big Four firm for its first full independent audit, indicating it's not running from scrutiny but choosing its jurisdiction, likely the US under the GENIUS Act.
- **The actual trigger: July 1, 2026** [04:46] — MiCA's grandfathering window closed on July 1, 2026. Revolut was the last major consumer platform to delist; others like Coinbase, Crypto.com, Binance, and Kraken had already removed USDT.
- **83% attrition rate of crypto firms** [05:34] — Of ~1,200 firms previously registered in the EU, only ~210 converted to full CASP authorization, an 83% drop. Estonia went from 641 providers to about 40.
- **Circle's compliant USDC becomes default** [07:09] — Circle Mint Europe holds an EMI license from France, passporting across the EU. USDC became the default compliant crypto dollar. BNY Mellon integrated USDC into its custody platform.
- **Euro stablecoin growth** [07:55] — EURC supply nearly doubled to ~380 million by mid-2026. The compliant euro stablecoin market grew 128% from ~$295M to ~$673M between June 2025 and June 2026.
- **European banks form consortium for euro stablecoin** [09:08] — 37 banks across 15 countries, including BNP Paribas, ING, and UniCredit, formed a consortium to issue their own euro stablecoin, targeting launch in H2 2026.
- **USDT's global market cap remains dominant** [09:54] — USDT's global market cap is ~$187 billion, ~60% of the stablecoin market. It contracted ~$5.4B between May and July but is growing in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.
- **Two-track market emerges** [10:42] — Europe produced a two-track market: regulated Western venues run on compliant assets, while offshore and emerging markets run on USDT. Europe targeted venues, not the asset.
- **ECB's concerns about digital dollarization** [11:14] — ECB officials warn that foreign-denominated stablecoins threaten monetary policy and pull deposits from European banks. They propose a digital euro as a solution.
- **Digital euro pilot and timeline** [12:43] — The ECB selected 36 payment providers for its digital euro pilot, including Revolut. The pilot runs from H2 2026 with issuance targeted for 2029.
- **Global regulatory trends** [13:13] — UK, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Japan are implementing licensing and localization regimes. The US GENIUS Act takes a different approach, promoting dollar stablecoins globally.
- **Authorization is the new bar for scale** [14:43] — Tether won on liquidity but lost in Europe because authorization is now required. Banks are rushing to issue regulated tokens, signaling stablecoins are permanent infrastructure.

### Conclusion

Europe's MiCA regulation has effectively excluded Tether from its market by targeting venues rather than the asset itself, while promoting compliant alternatives like USDC and a future digital euro. This creates a two-track global stablecoin market, with the US promoting dollar stablecoins and Europe filtering them, and the long-term winner will be determined by which regulatory template becomes the global default.

## Transcript

On August 31st, 40 million Revolute users  in Europe will see something happen to their   assets without them having any say in it at  all. Any USDT still held on Revolute after   that date will be automatically converted  into fiat at the market rate. Whether the  
user authorized the sale or not. And here's the  strange thing about this forced sale. Nobody   outright banned Tether in Europe. There was no  ruling and no press conference from Brussels.   the largest stable coin on Earth simply declined  to apply for a license to operate. It seems rather  
strange for a major stable coin issuer to just  walk away from a massive market, right? Well,   it is strange and that's because there's so much  more to the story than people know. So, today   we're going to look at exactly what's happening  here, why Europe pre-built the alternative before  
pulling the plug, and what European Central  Bank is actually protecting here. Because,   surprise, surprise, it's not you. My name is DC  and this is the Coin Bureau. Okay, let's begin   with a timeline on Revolute pulling the plug on  Tether. Revolute announced it on July 3rd this  
year. Tether buys were switched off on July 6th.  Deposits stopped being accepted from July 30th and   on August 31st the full D-listing lands with that  automatic conversion. And when it comes to scope,   this applies to the entire European economic area  plus Switzerland. Everywhere else in Revolute's  
footprint, UST carries on exactly as before.  That tells you pretty quickly that this was   not Revolute having an opinion about Tether. In  November 2025, Revolute received a Micah crypto   asset service provider or CASP license from CIC,  the Criate Regulator. And under Micah, a licensed  
CASP is legally prohibited from offering the  public any e-money token whose issuer isn't   found in the authorized register. Needless to say,  Tether isn't in the register. And as a result,   the token had to go. But there's a much more  important distinction to be made here. Micah does  
not make it illegal for you to hold USDT. Self-  custody is untouched and peer-to-peer transfers   are not affected. Every single legal analysis  you can find on this framework will tell you   that exactly. The regulation governs venues and  issuers, not possessions. So, the asset is legal,  
but the on-ramp is not, which is in practice a  far more effective way of removing something than   banning it because nobody ever has to defend a ban  in court. And this raises the question, why did   Tether just let this happen? Well, because to get  authorized as an e-money token issuer in the EU,  
you need either a credit institution license or an  electronic money institution license. And for the   big ones, what Micah calls significant e-oney  tokens, you have to park 60% of your reserves   as deposits in EU commercial banks. That was the  sticking point for Tether. Paulo Arduino has said  
as much over and over again, and he's even gone  so far as to call that requirement dangerous.   His argument is that it forces an issuer to swap  the credit risk of shortdated US treasuries for   uninsured exposure to commercial banks and EU  deposit insurance caps out at €100,000, which  
against a reserve pool measured in the tens of  billions is essentially nothing. And to be fair,   he can point to one specific event as evidence  that this is bad policy. March 2023, Silicon   Valley Bank Circle had $3.3 billion of USDC  reserves stuck inside a bank that stopped existing  
over a weekend. And USDC, the safe, compliant,  regulated one, briefly traded down to about 87.   So Arduino's position is that the rule designed  to make stable coins safer is the exact same rule  
that broke a stable coin 3 years ago. And when  it comes down to it, he's not wrong. You don't   have to like Tether to notice that putting all  your money in banks is not exactly good advice.   Roughly 80% of USDT's reserve sit in shortated  US treasuries and Tether would much rather keep  
them there. They also discontinued EURT, the Euro  version of USDT rather than just restructuring it   with redemptions closing in November 2025. But  before we file this under principled resistance,  
we have to look at one thing. On March 24th this  year, Tether announced it had formally engaged a   big four firm for its first full independent  financial statement audit. Moving beyond the   quarterly attestations it's relied on for years,  which rather undercuts the idea that Tether is  
running from scrutiny. A company that can survive  an audit doesn't go looking out for one. Right?   So, this shows a company actively choosing its  jurisdiction. They're building toward the American   framework, specifically the Genius Act signed on  July 18th, 2025, which mandates annual audits for  
any issuer above $50 billion. So, they're walking  away from the European one. And this appears to be   a deliberate strategic choice. And that decision  only works out the way it did because Revolute was  
the final domino to fall. The actual trigger date  was July 1st, 2026, the day Micah's grandfathering   window slammed shut and every transitional  arrangement expired. Everything before that was   firms getting ahead of it. Coinbase pulled UST for  EA users back in December 2024. Crypto.com removed  
it along with nine other tokens in January 2025.  Binance restricted regulated USDT spot pairs in   the EA in March 2025 with Kraken and OKX moving  in the same window. Bit Vavo, Bitstamp, and Bit  
toMe all cleared non-compliant dollar and euro  tokens off their books ahead of the deadline. So,   by the time Revolute sent that notice, the token  had already been swept off essentially every   regulated Western venue. Revolute was simply the  last consumer surface standing. But there's one  
other number that might change your outlook on  this entire situation, and it has nothing to do   with stable coins at all. Of roughly 1,200 firms  previously registered across the EU under national   regimes, only around 210 converted to full CASP  authorization. That's an 83% attrition rate. And  
that pattern is clear as day everywhere across the  whole EA. Estonia alone went from 641 registered   providers in 2021 down to about 40 by early 2025.  What if you could trade real US stocks like Apple,  
Nvidia, or Tesla without leaving your crypto  account? Well, that's the idea behind our tokens   from BitGet. These are tokenized stocks backed one  to one by real shares. But the key difference is  
they are actually usable. You can trade them, use  them as margin, and even earn dividends instead   of just letting them sit in your wallet. So, if  you want to check them out for yourself, sign up   for BitGet using the link in the description or by  scanning this QR code. Only 16 of the world's 100  
largest exchanges by volume hold a micro license  at all. So, Europe effectively filtered the entire   industry and depending where you stand, this is  either a good thing or a bad thing. But Tether is  
the most valuable thing caught in a net that was  catching pretty much everything. Now, the obvious   objection here is that removing the world's  biggest stable coin from a 450 million person   economy should have caused chaos, but it didn't.  And the reason it didn't is that the replacement  
was built first. Here comes Circle. Circle Mint  Europe holds an electronic money institution   license from the ACPR, the French regulator  granted back in July 2024. And under Micah,  
that single license passports across the entire  block. So USDC became the default compliant crypto   dollar in Europe by being the one that filed the  paperwork. Then came the institutional signal.   On June 30th this year, BNY Melon integrated USDC  directly into its digital asset custody platform.  
Institutional clients can now hold, transfer,  mint, and burn USDC and swap between dollars   and USDC without ever leaving the bank's own  infrastructure. When the oldest bank in America   builds a stable coin into its custody stack, it  becomes a permanent feature. On the euro side,  
the numbers are smaller, but the trajectory is  pretty undeniable. EURC, the euro equivalent   of USDC, almost doubled in supply across 2026  from around 200 million at the start of the year  
to approximately 380 million by midyear, taking  the dominant share of the compliant euro market.   Soian rise EURCVs up over 200% yearonear to about  105 million euro and crucially that one is issued  
under a credit institution framework a licensed  bank behind them are Quantos which issues EURQ   and USDQ under Dutch central bank supervision  banking circle with EURI and membrane whose  
euroe is authorized by Finland's regulator just  to put things into perspective at the start of   2026 there were five micro compliant euro stable  coins. By June, there were already eight. And the   compliant Euro stable coin market as a whole grew  128% between June 2025 and June 2026 from roughly  
$295 million to around $673 million. Still  small, but growing incredibly fast. However,   there's one other name to take note of in this  big sectoral shift. Quivalis. In December 2025,  
12 European banks founded a consortium to issue  their own euro stable coin. By May of this year,   25 more banks joined in a single wave. It now  stands at 37 institutions across 15 countries.  
BNP Pariba, ING, Uni Credit, and many, many more.  They've applied for an EMI license from the Dutch   Central Bank. They've picked Firebox for the  custody and to organization infrastructure, and   they're targeting a launch in the second half of  this year. So, what's really happening here? Well,  
Europe is clearing a lane and banks driving into  that lane are more than happy to do so because   their deposit base is threatened by dollar stable  coins. Now, when it comes to Tether in specific,   there's plenty of commentary about outflows and  liquidity migrating toward USDC and EURC, but  
that commentary isn't evidence. What we can do is  look at the highle figures to get a sense of how   this truly impacted the stable coin market. USDT's  global market cap sits at roughly $187 billion.  
That's still roughly 60% of the entire stable coin  market. It contracted about 5.4 billion between   May and July this year, but that's a global  figure. And USDT is growing hard through Asia,  
Africa, and Latin America. So, you can't really  pin that on Europe. Meanwhile, onchain stable coin   volume hit a record of $1.79 trillion in June,  even while total supply contracted. And well, that  
looks like consolidation. What Europe actually  produced is a two-track market. Regulated Western   venues running on compliant assets, offshore and  emerging market venues running on USDT. Europe  
targeted the venues while leaving the asset alone.  And the real friction is actually found inside the   compliant camp. There's a live proposal that would  restrict certain institutional onchain settlements   to tokens issued by credit institutions which  would hand the advantage straight to the banks and  
disadvantage to issuers like Circle. One policy  paper from May this year argues Micah's liquidity   rules are actively hurting the competitiveness of  Euro tokens. The industry is pushing back hard,   so the rules are still being sharpened. But once  you see who they're being sharpened in favor of,  
the whole thing stops to look like crypto policy.  Because listen to what the European Central   Bank has been saying. Christine Lagard has been  warning about digital dollarization that foreign   denominated stable coins threaten monetary policy  transmission and can pull deposits straight out of  
European banks. Pierro Chipolona, a member of the  ECB's executive board, said on July 17th that the   threat is to commercial banks retail deposit base,  their funding costs and visibility over payments.  
His stated solution is a digital euro that is  capped and deliberately non-interest bearing   designed from the ground up so it can never  actually become a savings vehicle that drains   the banks it's meant to protect. But by far the  sharpest line came from Isabel Schnabble on June  
1st in a keynote in Soul. She compared stable  coins to 1970s American money market funds.   both promise redemption at par and both invest  in short-term assets and both she argued pull   deposits out of the banking system and create  bankrun risk on the way. So according to EU policy  
makers themselves this is fundamentally a deposit  flight problem and that makes even more sense   when you consider the timing. The digital euro  preparation phase wrapped up in late October 2025.   In July this year, the ECB selected 36 payment  providers for its pilot, including Doge Bank,  
Stripe, and yes, Revolute. The same company  autoconverting your USCT is piloting the state's   alternative. So, the 12-month pilot runs from  the second half of 2026 with issuance targeted  
for 2029. And there's one more stat that drives  this home. Between 98 and 99% of all stable coins   are dollar denominated. A currency block watching  its entire digital payment layer get denominated  
in someone else's money is facing a sovereignity  problem. It responded in a way you'd more or less   expect a sovereign to respond. And it appears  that Europe has set a bit of a standard on   this. The UK's FCA is building a regime around  reserve backing and local authorization with its  
regulatory gateway expected to open in September  this year. Hong Kong stable coins ordinance took   effect in August 2025 and the HKMA issued its  first two licenses in April this year including to   HSBC. Singapore requires monthly addestations and  redemption at PA within five business days. Japan  
runs a fiat reference regime with local issue  accountability. So the general idea is to license,   localize, and hold entities accountable. But  then there's Washington doing pretty much the  
exact opposite. The Genius Act carved compliant  payment stable coins out from under the SEC and   CFTC entirely, handing oversight to the banking  regulators. Reserves can be treasuries, repos,   or Fed account credits with no mandated minimum  sitting in bank deposits at all. So, compare that  
to Micah's 60% requirement, and you're looking  at the precise rule Tether refused to accept,   absent from the American framework by design.  And a 2026 executive order went even further,  
explicitly prioritizing the global promotion  of lawful dollarbacked stable coins openly   presented as making these things a structural buy  of US treasuries. So there are now two templates   on the table, license and promote or license  and exclude. Washington is exporting dollar  
stable coins while Brussels is filtering them  and every other jurisdiction on the planet is   currently picking a side. For a decade, the  question that determined whether a stable   coin would win market share was whether it could  get users liquidity. And Tether won that race so  
comprehensively it isn't even close. $187 billion  and 60% of the entire market. But in Europe,   it lost anyway because the new bar for existing at  scale is authorization. And look who rushed into  
the space that opened up. 37 banks didn't join  a consortium to build something they think is   useless. BNY Melon and wired USDC into its custody  platform for a technology it expects to disappear.  
There's no denying it. The largest financial  institutions in Europe are competing to issue   regulated tokens because they've decided stable  coins are permanent infrastructure. Tether's time   in Europe may have ended, but stable coins are  only just beginning. But what do you think? Does  
Europe's model become the global default, or does  the American approach of aggressively promoting   dollar stable coins abroad simply steamroll it?  Please get highly opinionated in the comments and   let us know. And if you want the full picture  of how Micah reshaped this entire market,  
then you should definitely check out our  breakdown right over here. As always,   thanks so much for watching and I'll see  you again very soon. This is DC signing off.