---
title: 'This Artist FAKED Their Art Growth For Clout...'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=8cXwr12COr8'
video_id: '8cXwr12COr8'
date: 2026-08-17
duration_sec: 94
channel: 'kat ''n chat'
---

# This Artist FAKED Their Art Growth For Clout...

> Source: [This Artist FAKED Their Art Growth For Clout...](https://youtube.com/watch?v=8cXwr12COr8)

## Summary

This video analyzes a case of art fraud in the digital art community, where an artist was accused of tracing or copying the work of other artists, specifically Rexbo and Hyde. The video breaks down the evidence presented by the community, including suspicious speed paint footage and inconsistencies in the artist's technique, leading to a public confrontation and the artist's defensive response.

### Key Points

- **Accusation of Art Fraud** [00:01] — An artist posted an art progress update, but community members accused them of not improving quickly and of copying another artist named Rexbo, whose style their work closely resembles.
- **Second Artist Accused** [00:15] — Another artist, Hyde, commented that they believe the accused artist uses both Rexbo's work and their own, pointing out the similarity between the pieces.
- **Visual Similarity Evidence** [00:28] — A side-by-side comparison shows the accused artist's piece and the original artist's work look very similar, reinforcing the plagiarism claims.
- **Suspicious Speed Paint Analysis** [00:42] — Viewers analyzing the speed paint noticed oddities: the time taken for a complex piece seems too short, and there is no body skeleton, which is unusual for such detailed work.
- **Line Work Inconsistency** [00:56] — The line work in the speed paint appears less advanced than the final piece, particularly around the eye, suggesting the artist may have traced or used another's work.
- **Artist's Defensive Response** [01:11] — After being called out, the artist dismissed the accusations as misunderstandings, stating they would move forward without being held back by the critics.
- **Community Rejection** [01:25] — By the end, nobody believed the artist's claims of legitimacy, and the community rejected their defense.

### Conclusion

The video highlights how digital art communities can detect and call out potential art theft through careful analysis of process and technique, and how defensive responses often fail to convince a skeptical audience.

## Transcript

being fake. So, this was the art progress update and everybody in the sign a deal with the devil? How did you improve so fast?" And they were like, posted this being like, "Hey, they didn't actually improve that quickly.
artist." And that is an artist named Rexbo. Their art style looks just like this artist claims to be drawing. And then another artist with the name of Hyde commented under their post being like, "I actually think they use both
Rex's work and my work." As you see here, the piece on the right is done by one done by the artist and they look really, really similar. Again, no one's essence of the artwork looks really similar. So, the artist in question then
looking at the speed paint, they were like, "Wait, things look really odd. everything goes for a really complex piece like this? Secondly, there is no body skeleton." Now, some people draw without a body skeleton, but again, no
where everything belongs is a very, very suspicious. And third, the line work looks less advanced than what is shown in the final piece. Especially right here as they draw this element by the eye. That looks much more intermediate
beginner, but they somehow are able to draw this well. How? So, after showing was like, "Yo, I'm not believing you at all. This looks super suspicious." The artist just went onto their page being like, "Hey, you guys are all wrong. You
misunderstandings. I know nothing I say will get through to you anymore. I'll move forward without being held back by you." But by then, nobody believed that you." But by then, nobody believed that they're legit.