[00:02] Now let us see one more thing in this, like till yesterday the senior people of Saurabh government were saying that the meeting takes place either in the ministry or at home
[00:14] Institution Club or CJP, today the government finally went there, so it is clearly visible that the government is saying that yes we reached out, if we reached out then we could have done it, we could have done it earlier also, so tell us this by tomorrow and then today
[00:28] if you are going there.  So this simply means that the government realises that if by doing this you are ending this protest
[00:40] because Sonam Bangch's appeal to the Prime Minister has ended, a new law is being brought.  Lee law means that the previous law is being amended. after all the Institution Club is also the property of the Parliament.  So if the meeting is being held at that place also then there is no
[00:53] problem.  It is a good thing that if I agree then the government did a good thing brother, no matter what, we had the guarantee of the children and if you see the way of seating them, it was not at all like that those children were
[01:05] sitting on equal footing, you both were sitting in front and here the minister is sitting and both the ministers are exactly the same, they are very cheerful, in that way the conversation was also the same, so definitely you can say that yes, there was a two hour discussion in a good direction, he
[01:17] himself told that there was a two hour discussion, so it means that in two hours there was a lot of detail in it, that the government explained a lot to them like how the compensation is given, what is its process, how it used to happen earlier, how it is happening now,
[01:31] what were the things that happened earlier regarding copying, you will be surprised to know that in 1986 when the New Education Policy came during Rajiv Gandhi's time, it
[01:45] mentioned that a strict law will be made at the central level regarding copying and paper leak and when is that law being made, in the time of Narendra Modi, tell me,
[01:59] think almost after 40 years, from 1986  But you were waiting till now and for so long. What will happen to Dharmendra Pradhan ji?  Does the government have to answer them tomorrow? Look, this is what these CJP people were saying.  It is possible that the government may have said something else.   You may have
[02:12] said something else.  Because the government has not said that we will discuss whether the resignation will happen or not within 24 hours. not said that we will discuss whether the resignation will happen or not within 24 hours. I have had so far today, it is being said repeatedly at all levels of the government that we had
[02:26] that we had a system in place.  Under that system we had to make improvements and we have made a lot of improvements in things like paper leaks.   The last line will appear on your answer. Listen to the background given by the government before that.
[02:39] They repeatedly want to know in one line whether to say yes or no.  The as an example, 2 crore 18 lakh candidates appeared for the Railway examination in this one year
[02:51] and that examination was conducted properly.  The government says that there are approximately 80-85 years of such exams which were conducted properly.  If we talk about NTA, then there are 12 to 15 lakh people appearing for IIT JE exam.  That
[03:07] exam is going well. We will also fix the problem that has arisen regarding this.  This We will also fix the problem that has arisen regarding this.  This means that till date, when we are discussing within the government regarding the resignation of the minister,
[03:24] I said earlier, the same thing was being said yesterday regarding the neutral place, there was a change in it. So now if the government does something like that, then till now you are not hearing any discussion anywhere that we are even considering the resignation of the minister.
[03:36] yes, one more thing Saurabh, as it was told that the Secretary of the Education Ministry, Secretary of the Education Ministry, said to be from the Sangh background and has been associated with that ideological family in some way or the other.
[03:49] Despite this, strict action has been taken against him. strict action has been taken against him. improve this system. Ministry of Education is going to make a big announcement at 8:00 pm, NTA
[04:02] NTA, there are many improvements in it, at 8:00 pm.  Well, NTA people will be in it. Meaning it is about NTA that what all What changes are taking place in the system of conducting examinations?   It is being
[04:17] all these things were being done after the last league which were bound to happen Now you understand its meaning, sir.  See, tomorrow the Prime Minister directly talks to the youth and says that for your concerns we are bringing a bill to stop paper leak, there is a
[04:32] bringing a bill to stop paper leak, there is a all the punishments will be given in 3 months, all the decisions will be taken against all the culprits, the government is making these arrangements and now the news that is coming is that how the exams should be conducted,
[04:47] how they should be conducted, ah, big decisions are going to be taken regarding this, the government is taking policy decisions and this is actually the work of the government.  The government's job is to provide order.  So since
[04:59] yesterday the government is saying in mission mode that we are working on the root of the disease.  We are addressing the problem wherever it is. Now he probably wants to say that the problem will not be solved by removing the Education Minister.  If you appoint someone else, it does
[05:12] not mean that everything is fine.  Everything has to be fixed and we are working towards fixing everything. This is the larger message he is giving.  Not just those who are protesting there. He may not agree despite this.  But this system is for a larger country.
[05:27] This is the message that you are seeing what we are doing.  You are able to understand whether not.  Now whether these people believe it or not.  That is entirely different. Because it is not necessary that this decision is taken by the
[05:43] could be the decision of many people standing behind him and their motives could be very different from education. motives could be very different from education. started since the Prime Minister came to power in 2014, the program which he
[05:55] 2014, the program which he himself started and the himself started and the law which was first brought in 2024 on this issue, there was a provision for punishment in that too.  The irregularities that happen in examinations were started by him in 24 also.
[06:08] So I believe that last night itself it is correct that the process was going on to draft the law. You should think about it. It is being said that now the government has woken up. Tell me, has the bill been prepared today been prepared? Well,
[06:23] look at its process in advance. Suppose Prime Minister Devendra ji visits many things regularly, so he might know some things, but there are many things which are being processed after the file is moved, what program is being made? I think that's why, I mean, my observation is that look, there are
[06:36] two messages in this political movement, the people behind which, whether it is Aam Aadmi Party or Congress or CIA, we don't know who they are. It is not correct, it is not someone who has come down from America. Till date, has such a thing happened in India that a
[06:51] person declares a party and sitting in New York says that sir, this party is somebody CIA. That is why I am saying that whenever there is instability in India, such an environment is created, which happened even during Kejriwal's time, that anarchy is created, then there is an element
[07:04] which can do that too.  I am not saying that is what he does. I believe that such a situation has arisen before, was it Chidambaram 's resignation? Whatever happened to Chidambaram in the 2G case was a bigger scam than this.  This is not a scam.  This
[07:18] is a glitch in the system.  The process of improving it is going on.