[00:01] secret to a successful deal, yes, this is the correct analysis of the context. Why is this such an important topic? Because I keep seeing the same problem. So, learning smartmanaging isn't a problem, but how to apply it, and [00:16] how to find deals correctly, is. This is what problem itself is that everyone is trying to find an entry point, but [00:28] no one, as a rule, yes, thinks about the fact that the entry point is, yes, about the fact that the entry point is, yes, some last link in a chain that consists of, uh, three elements. First comes the context, then comes the setup, [00:42] and the entry point is already, you know, as a result of, yes, everything that we found on the chart before, and the analysis that we conducted. So the main thing. That is, once we enter there technically often, this is already, you know, the [00:58] last thing to do. That is, the element in which we are looking for a setup is much more important. And, of course, the setup itself. How logically it is structured, how well it is formed. I [01:10] decided to put these three concepts on the first slide in order to clearly distinguish the difference between them. Then we will talk in detail about the context. So what is context, right? In a general sense, this is a set of [01:23] market conditions that seem to prevail in the market at an absolutely specific moment in time is, naturally, different. I'll give you an example. An hour ago the situation was like this, yes, and then some news comes out, for example, [01:37] or it came out suddenly, or it was planned, for example, and then, I don’t know, data on unemployment, for example, I’m saying, that is, and the context in which [01:49] our market is, it changes sharply, let’s say . Of course, context is something that is divided into several categories. That is, there is a technical category. This is all that we can read from the graph. This is a trend, yes, this is the [02:05] market base and so on. That is, all this can be seen by opening the chart. And there is a category, let me call it, probably fundamental. That is, the fundamental category of context will include all those factors [02:18] that, let's say, influence the market from the outside, yes. This could be, let's say, market sentiment, right? It's like this, for example, yes, there is an indicator of fear and certain extent, reflects the market mood . And here we [02:34] can also include, for example, an assessment of, yes, the capitalization of the crypto market, an assessment of the dominance of Bitcoin, an assessment of the dominance of, uh, USDT and many, many other factors USDT and many, many other factors that in one way or another influence the market [02:50] . That is, the context is all the market conditions at a specific point in time. If we talk about technical issues, yes, now about the context, this is examining in detail today, this is generally understanding what phase the market is in, [03:04] what direction the trend is on a higher time frame. We need to understand in general what the key levels of supply and demand are on the chart , where the key liquidity is, and other factors, we will talk about them too. That is, the context [03:17] gives us a definition of the directions for work and answers the question of who is currently in control of the market. That is, when I’m looking for, uh, a deal, I have to understand who’s in control of the market right now: the seller or the buyer. And, naturally, I [03:32] join the country that currently controls the market. Because, I repeat, if we haven’t analyzed the context and, let’s say, I come across a short setup, yes, short, that is, there is an [03:44] opportunity to enter there, let’s say, as it seems to me, into a good short, but I haven’t studied the context, yes, the context, based on many, yes, factors, indicated that it’s probably the gap that is often misunderstood, by the way, not [03:56] only by beginners, but I see that even people who have been trading for a very long time sometimes do not understand what and how, yes, in general, to do with context and how much influence it has. That is, we can technically find an absolutely [04:08] wonderful opportunity there to enter a short. And it seems like everything is working out, yes, and the areas of interest, and well, everything looks very logical and clear, but simply because the market is now inclined in the general context to move in the other direction, [04:20] these steps often, yes, break down and do not work out. Therefore, context is what . That is, well, to understand, yes, in general, this short is taking place now or it is not taking place. And how logically he [04:33] has built this short, yes, how good the quality setup is there. In fact, the question is already of the second order. That is, context always comes first. Next, yes, we move on to the setup. That is, a setup is already a favorable set of [04:47] circumstances in which there is a high probability of price movement in a certain direction. That is, if I, let's say, having assessed the context, well, I understand that, probably, yes, the market, based on these general factors, that is, probably [05:00] will move, let's say, to a long position, but this still does not give me the opportunity to somehow enter somewhere, yes, or somehow somewhere something, yes, to keep an eye on this entry. That is, in order for me to understand at all that there is an opportunity to [05:13] take some kind of long movement, a setup must appear. That is, our setup is primarily built from targets for price movement. This may also be a revelation for many, because everyone is looking for an entry point. But the first thing [05:27] we are looking for is not actually the entry point, but the exit point of the trade. Because we need to understand what we will be standing on in this deal . If the price doesn't have a . If the price doesn't have a magnet, then no matter how [05:42] entry point is, it has absolutely no meaning, because the price moves from one magnet to another. And understanding which magnet the price is heading towards, and now we could say, that we can generally keep an eye on this entry point. That [05:58] is, the first thing is what the stop is made of , this is in first place, yes, this is the target for price movement. Our target is always significant pulquities, behind which there may also be, for example, an [06:10] filled imbalance. I mean, well, it liquidity. That is, we have, let's say, a goal. I see on the chart that there are, let's say, some equal highs. And that is, I understand that gas, that the price, [06:24] let’s say, is moving in the direction of this tangent. And what I need to do now, yes, when I see that this target exists, is to find a support area, and from which, probably, I understand that the price can move towards these [06:36] targets. That is, what is a support area? Well, in other resistance zone. That is, if we have a target there, let’s say, in Blon, then I understand that there must be an area from which, probably, yes, it [06:48] will come, and if it pushes off from it, then where will it go? Probably to my targets. That is, I need a support area further. Next, this is already, in principle, as I said, it is necessary to evaluate the market structure. So, yes, [07:00] price movement, we need to understand whether the price is moving towards them or away from them, because this often happens, and I also see this in a number of mistakes in homework assignments, when liquidity pool, there are the same frame highs [07:15] or lows, ae, on the chart, but this does not necessarily mean that the price will remove them in the near future, right? It is a magnet and it is a strong magnet. However, well, specifically for them, because there are, well, actually a lot of magnets on the chart. And in order to [07:31] really be sure that the price is moving precisely towards the magnet that to look at how close the price is to it, firstly. This is the close the price is to it, firstly. This is the first thing. The second is, accordingly, [07:44] to understand whether the trend is directed towards this magnet. That is, if we have an equal, what kind of magnet is this for me? That is, I understand that the price is moving away from the magnet, yes, and not towards it. Accordingly, I, well, will not consider the setup there with a [07:57] target on this zone. It makes sense, right? That is, I pay attention to the structure. It is directed towards targets or moves away from them. Oh, and also, when we have already found, let's say, some target and even found a support area, but there are [08:11] two points that we should pay attention to. This is, uh, target's support area, because it also happens that there are equal here, well, let's say, somewhere here is the trend for now, and then [08:26] imbalance that has formed according to the trend . Well, obviously that's too far, right? So what's the best thing for me to do, right? That is, the price here can still go up for a long time, and I would like to find a support area [08:39] that will be, well, as close as possible to these targets, right? That is, it should not be somewhere very, very, very far away, so that the price, a huge amount of I have a target only here, but it turns out that this is the distance that [08:52] magnets or targets here. If there are many targets here, which are there are pools of cascading liquidity, then, of course, yes, that is, I can my target. But when the target is, let's say, high or very [09:07] low, and I'm trying, yes, to aim at it , while most of the be the case. Friends, an important point. We have a free Telegram channel where we publish educational content on [09:21] SmartMoney trading every day. These materials are available only in our Telegram channel. Here are some tips and life hacks that you won't find on YouTube. Here we regularly publish content on trading psychology and show how to correctly open [09:35] profitable trades. We periodically publish lists of promising coins for trading and provide tips on where to enter a trade and where to lock in profits. If you want to make trading a source of steady income, then subscribe to [09:49] our Telegram channel. The link to the channel is now on the screen, as well as in the description below this video. Subscribe and let's trade together. be. And another point that we pay attention to is problem areas, because sometimes [10:03] problem areas, in principle, are factors that can completely negate the setup. Well, that is, for example, I am like this, by the way, that often happens, let's take this example . There is such a movement, such an [10:16] for example, the price entered some zone of interest, and it begins to move here Some kind of orderderflow is already emerging here . In general, the context, uh, or not, it doesn’t matter. Well, let's say I see that, aha, a trend has already formed here, SMS [10:31] resistance zone, we are starting to go down. And, let's say, I have some targets here, yes, I understand that there is a possibility that the price will come to them soon let's say we are on an hour, I switch to a four-hour, [10:45] and I have a bullish imbalance here. Well, it's clear that there's no point in aiming at any of these targets anymore . Because, imbalance, which is what? It is a support zone. The price [11:00] will not, naturally, stand against the bullish zone on any targets that are located beyond it. That is, problem areas are absolutely any zones that are against us. That is, if I want to short, then I don’t need bullish [11:15] zones of interest against me. And just the opposite, if I want to go long, then I don’t need bearish zones of interest, that is, which the price must pass through. That is, any obstacles, or they might be there, but they should be, well, let’s say [11:29] , insignificant. What is a minor obstacle? I'll also give you an example. Well, let's say that if I have such an accumulation of trend liquidity, yes, that is, this is my target for movement. That is, let's say I want to fix my deal here, yes, there [11:41] on the last of them, and somewhere there, right here, there is still a small untested imbalance left, bearish, for example. That yes, I want to catch this kind of movement. But here there is this small bearish [11:54] imbalance. Well, it’s clear that in such a context it doesn’t represent any particular value . That is, well, it’s likely that either the price here, even if it some kind of short-term reaction, we will continue to grow, or the price in [12:06] significant this semi-liquidity is, will simply pass this small imbalance and will not be noticed. But all this needs to be looked at only, as it were, yes, um, well, in each specific situation, because they are all completely different. and say, yes, [12:20] well, in theory, yes, exactly what kind of obstacle will interfere, and what might not be an obstacle at all. That is, it is only needed in context. So, well, lastly, yes, this is a model for entering a trade. Look, it's [12:35] easy to get confused here too, because every trader has their own setups that they trade. So, the setup is not just one thing, right? That is, if we talk about context, then the context is [12:50] setup, then there are already a huge, huge, huge number of setups here. That is, for example, if we take some very ordinary setup, well, let's say, that is, a setup - this is, uh, let's say, let's take some [13:03] setup, let's call it a trend, for example, yes, this is, uh, in the word of structure. So, let's say we have a trend, my targets are somewhere here, and I have, let's say, a zone of interest, yes, that is , let's say, this is the ation block, and [13:16] my setup is based on what? That is, I have a target once, there is a support area in the form of two zones of interest. And I want to see a breakdown of the structure from these two areas on a lower time frame. That is, to see that the price came here like this [13:29] on a lower time frame, and then broke the structure here. And this is, as it were, my setup, yes, that is, everything is a breakdown of the structure, accordingly, that is, I can already, well, there, look for an entry point or even enter a position. That is, and [13:41] this is precisely what is , uh, well, that is, it is certain, like some kind of coincidence of circumstances, yes, favorable, what we call it. And, uh, here, so that you don’t get confused, yes, that is, the setup can be completely [13:54] well, by the way, traders do all this who has been in the market for a long time, that is, he always creates his own setups, these are his own combinations of some [14:07] filters that he finds at one point. That is, for example, I gave you a very simple example, right? That is, it’s just a trend, there’s just a support zone there. Here we are waiting for the breakdown of the structure. That is, there are such complex setups that they are extremely [14:20] rare, but yes, there are traders who are waiting for exactly these opportunities, for example, what else can we do here, how can we supplement this, yes, such a . We can connect anything here. For example, what I want to [14:35] see here is not just, yes, but a breakdown of the structure, yes, I want to, let's say, see a breakdown of the structure with fixation by the body, yes, I am already adding such points, want to see an increased volume, for example, yes, which occurred, let's say, here [14:49] during the withdrawal of liquidity. I want to see, well, not just a breakdown of the structure here, but for it to happen, for example, from the discount market zone, yes, well, and so on. That is, here are these many factors that we can [15:03] add to ourselves, so to speak. That is, there are a very, very large number of them. And here you need to understand that each setup is something completely different. And what is this? It will be up to the trader to decide. Same as entry models. The entry model is, [15:16] so to speak , part of the setup. That is, for example, you saw your setup, let's say, the entire structure broke down here, there with the whole balance, the body fixation, yes, everything, that is, your setup was formed. And here the [15:29] entry model, that is, what it can be, is also always decided by the trader, that is, what is his model. That is, when, let’s say, our imbalance forms, what will we most often do? Most often we will wait for a pullback [15:43] to imbalance and then enter. And this rollback, yes, what do we want to see here, yes, within this imbalance? For example, we, I don’t know, let’s say we want to see, yes, one breakdown of the structure here already on a lower time frame, or I [15:55] want to see some kind of, maybe , reversal pattern there. That is, well, anything you like, these are again, yes, conditions that are set exclusively for traders. That is, ah, ah, if I take it into this setup in principle, yes, then what [16:08] look, by the way, if we go by is something generally big and extensive, right? And then the setup is, as it were, a more local picture within the framework of a broader, yes, large context. And the entry point [16:23] is already so small, well, let 's say, yes, such a grain. This is simply the moment when the deal opens. So what should the setup be? It is a logical continuation of the context. That is, it should answer the [16:36] question, yes, why is the market ready to move right now? That is, if I, I drew, yes, here , let’s say, is the zone of interest, and here I am waiting for the structure to break down. Why is the market ready to move now? Well, because [16:49] tested the key zone of interest, yes, which we formed within the framework of the last impulse, because here, for example, yes, there could have been some liquidity on the lower that was removed. There are no more magnets here, right? Here, for example, you [17:03] can throw in whatever you want, again, yes, there was an SMT divergence formed there , a PRS divergence, which also gives an indirect, yes, mm, an indirect understanding of where the market will go now and so on. So here is our [17:15] setup. That is, he answers the question. That's when you see a setup and move right now? Why can't it do something like this and then because it won’t be entirely [17:28] example, I described it. That is, if there is a key support zone here, and the price breaks through it, then perhaps this indicates something? The fact is that, in principle, longs are no longer relevant, and shorts are now relevant. So everything breaks down here, right? This is already an [17:41] unfavorable set of circumstances, yes, and there is no longer a high probability that the move up. Plus, if the price goes beyond this point, the can we talk about in such a situation? And when we have a setup, in fact, [17:56] I’ll just speak for myself, for my trading. For me, in principle, the setup trading. For me, in principle, the setup is already, uh, like this is already the entry, but that’s how I trade. That is, uh, and for me, if, let’s say, [18:10] these criteria, these filters that I want to find on the graph are already fully formed, yes, I saw them all, I only have three or four of them there, let’s say, and at one point, right? then, in principle, at this moment I already open a deal. But [18:25] there are, let’s say, situations when I didn’t have time. So what do I mean? Let's that I just drew. That is, we have a trend. I'm waiting for a breakdown of the let's say, well, I open either I didn't have time, or, well, I doubted, didn't [18:41] want to enter here, let's say, the price here there broke the structure and even there began to go further up, let's say. That is, look, the setup, despite the fact that the price has already gone to the targets, has not lost its relevance [18:55] . Why? Because the setup is, first and foremost, an exit point. If the exit point is still there, that is, there is liquidity, removed, this means that this setup is still being worked out. And while [19:08] this setup is still relevant, I can look for an entry point along the way of this movement setup, but how I enter is already a secondary matter. That is, I can simply, yes, go there along the market, there with a stop here, if I [19:22] that will probably not be broken. Next, I can simply work here on a lower timeframe, understanding where the price is moving, based on the setup that I have formed there on a few or one [19:34] higher timeframe, or even on that timeframe. That is, the entry point is simply a , yes, that is, it is built, yes, on the basis of a logical setup. That is, the trigger, it kind of confirms the change in power. What are the most [19:48] common types of triggers? I use them sometimes, but I mostly use this one. I don’t use Confirm, but I also know someone who does. That is, this is a SWIP plus an elephant structure - this is when some [20:01] local liquidity is removed, a breakdown occurs. Next, it could be some kind of candlestick candlestick with a long shadow formed there, yes, this is what is called a pinbar. Or there was a interests me. Well, for example, that is, the [20:15] the price, broke the structure of that zone of interest, which was mine, yes, the key one. And then, when the collapse occurred, an imbalance was created. And so, for example, in this imbalance, I expect a liquidity sweep plus some other local breakdown of the [20:29] timeframe. That is, you see, we move from older to smaller to smaller. And when we find a chain like this, yes, which all leads to the fact that, yes, it is very likely, even more likely, that the price will move [20:43] super-high-quality transactions that, as a rule, yes, well, this approach, as a rule, brings a high win rate, yes, with this trend. That we see some kind of imbalance and that’s it. And we go to this liquidity with this imbalance. [20:58] It doesn't work like that at all. That is, it is important here to find a very, very large chain of these events in order to see, yes, and find what will really work. That is, the entry point is, in essence, simply the technical [21:12] moment of opening a transaction. And here's the most important thing - the presence of a zone for setting a stop-loss. And what question does it answer, that is, why the price is unlikely to reach the stop-loss zone before reaching the targets. That is, if [21:25] again, yes, everything is based on this example, so that it is clear. That is, if here is my trend, here is my key area of ​​interest, the price came here, for example, and broke the internal structure here , right? That's how it is. And I'm going to go in [21:39] answer myself this question: firstly, where should I put a stop if I enter now? And secondly, why doesn’t the price remove my stop and then go up? Now, if okay. What could be the answer? Well, for example, let's say I have an [21:55] imbalance here, yes, bullish, there is a block, that is, I understand that the price tested both zones, it entered the discount market range, it broke the structure here, let's say this happened there on increased volumes, a [22:09] bullish imbalance formed here. That is, I understand that, probably, this point, yes, that is, this one, word structure, probably, well, the price will not return here, but what should it works. some kind of liquidity, yes, that's how they [22:25] opposite situation, that is, let's say the price dropped into the zone zone, for example, the second one remained untested, somewhere here I have a pool of withdrawn. And I understand that technically there are structures here. Could it be [22:41] give a fake break, and then return to these targets and go up. That is, here, when we enter, it is important for us, in fact, not so much the where we put the stop, because, well, if the stop is activated, then there is no [22:53] deal at all, in principle. Therefore, it is not the entry itself that is more important, but the stop placement zone. It's already possible to go, no matter what, with a market limit. What's important here is where this stop is located. And here too, I would say that it is important to [23:05] train yourself to ask yourself the question, yes, why, probably, the price is not, well, it will go to the targets before it comes here again. So why doesn't she go there? Here. And you must have a logical answer to this, which must [23:18] chain that we just analyzed. Now let's move on to the context. We've figured out how the context differs from the entry point stage. Now we will talk in detail about context, about context and its elements. What is context, [23:32] what does it consist of, right? Ah, that is, the context, as I said, is general, yes, is, it is a set of conditions at a specific moment in time. As I said, they are divided, yes, these, uh, elements into many categories, [23:44] namely I named three. And each of these categories contains, uh, certain, yes, certain elements. We will now focus on what we can read from a pure graph, that is, the context simply on the graph, that is, on the smartman. The first [24:00] is the market phase, yes, when we are looking for an entry, we generally need to understand what phase the price is in. We have several phases, yes, this is accumulation or reaccumulation, yes, then expansion upwards, that is, in other words, an [24:15] distribution or redistribution, that is, distribution of the position by large capital and then expansion downwards. That is, this is a downward trend, yes, that is, when generally understand the market phase we are in. Because if the price, [24:31] let's say, shows signs of accumulation, yes, when does accumulation happen? That is, accumulation always occurs after a downward trend. Here the price goes into the Range, [24:46] and here a major player gains a position. And I, for example, ignore the market phase. For example, I see that there are signs of accumulation here, right? I understand that, yeah, shorting is no longer an option for me. But someone doesn’t see these signs of accumulation, [25:00] for example, and looks: “Aha, there’s a downward trend here, here there, for example, some imbalance hasn’t been tested yet.” And he takes advantage of this imbalance, for example, and goes short, that is, as if to continue the trend. Although, I repeat, there [25:12] were all the signs of accumulation here, that a major player is gaining a long position here, that is, he will probably continue to lead the asset in the appropriate direction, but ignoring the phases, yes, we could end up in such a situation. That [25:24] is, it is important to understand that the distribution of the vase is the opposite situation. That is, distribution a deal, distributes its previously accumulated position. That is, when there was an accumulated position. That is, when there was an upward trend, then the price is put into a [25:36] upward trend, then the price is put into a sideways movement, and, yes, and then there will be a movement like this . But again, yes, ignoring this fact, ignoring, let's say, that what can I do? take, for example, here to enter a continuation there with stock for [25:50] end up as a stop-loss simply because I ignored the market phase, which major player is going to lead the price. If, let's say, the market is already [26:02] in expansion, that is, if we are already in a trend, let's say, we see that there has already been, let's say, yes, a distribution phase and that's it, that is, they have already opened is, the price went after this sideways movement, which formed after the [26:17] understand that yes, yeah, that's it, that is, we are in the impulse phase, yes, in the , that is, I'm already looking at all sorts of local things, at order flow, at [26:29] areas of interest, and so on. That is, here we are simply working according to the trend. Next, what the context consists of is the direction of the trend on a higher timeframe. Let's say we have such a trend. And here, for example, the beloved [26:42] TDP pattern was formed. Yes, this is when we have two deviations and the student takes and draws all these pools as targets, as goals. And here, [26:54] on the basis of the TDP, for example, it comes in. Well, you understand, right? That is, the trend is upward. We take the structural points of this trend and, without any signs of a reversal yet, we define these structural points as [27:09] targets. This is not correct. That is, if we look at all of this from a slightly different angle and look, yes, here I pointed out an important point that when assessing a trend in general, we need to understand where this trend might end, that [27:22] is, until what point the trend might continue. That is, usually, if a trend has the preconditions to continue, then, as a rule, behind the current price position there will still be some magnets. Here. If [27:35] , let's say, we have them, it's a plus, but here there are still no prerequisites for a mini-trend, no breakdowns in the structure. Well, that is, yes, plus the general long will continue. We take it here, we [27:48] this is also faulty. That is, we must pay attention to the direction of the trend of the always try to work with the trend, because the trend continues many times, but only one changes, yes, and you can get a stop many times, [28:03] You can get a take profit many times just by working with this trend, because its continuation will always, well, the probability of supply will always be higher. That is, our trend is bullish or bearish. If there is a correction, then what kind of trend, [28:16] bullish or bearish? And to understand where this correction might end, yes, any correction always has potential. So, here, for entry, what are premium discount zones, and zones of interest, yes, that is, the support areas, up to what point the price [28:28] internal liquidity, which, likely, the price will remove before external liquidity, that is, to the renewal of a new structural point. That key levels. That is, the key levels in SRman are the zones of position accumulation by [28:43] large capital. That is, in other words, order blocks. That is, we need to understand where the key areas are where liquidity was removed, with, That is, liquidity was simply withdrawn from it , where liquidity was withdrawn and the [28:57] reversed. That is, where we see order blocks, there was probably a large capital accumulation of positions . And if we're talking about money, then order blocks tell us first and foremost where he [29:11] took his position. And if he was taking a long position, well, it's clear, yes, the same thing, there, yes, from this lake block now upwards, well, what's the point of also looking for shorts, let's say, right? That is, we need to understand where these key [29:24] order blocks are located. And here, yes, is a list of what we should evaluate when we evaluate an order block. That's how much significant liquidity was removed, right? Significant liquidity, here it is. And was this order block with a crowbar confirmed? Was there an [29:36] increase in the volume of liquidity withdrawals? Yes. Did they form balances during the impulse, and was the absorption strong? Because sometimes, for example, there is such an impulse, and here we absorb this impulse with [29:48] order block is this? Question, huh? That is, an order block is when we ate faster, yes, this is the removal of liquidity there. On the contrary, it should be something like this, and in the opposite direction it is desirable to have more impulse, but it happens that it is simply the [30:02] same movement back and forth. This is the most common option, but not like the first one, yes, that here quickly, but like here slowly. I mean, what probably dominant for now, even though a complete [30:15] takeover has occurred. Therefore, it is definitely necessary to look at the nature of this takeover . And then it’s a test for others. That is, if our order block was formed during testing of other zones of interest, and preferably even other order blocks, not [30:28] necessarily, but preferably, yes, or imbalances, then, of course, this will also be a good sign that this order block, let's say, yes, which we define as a whey, that is, it was formed not just somewhere, yes, it was also formed in [30:40] accordingly, logical. The picture completely acquires, yes, that is, a certain meaning. Next, this is key liquidity. Nuno, it's actually significant stop-loss clusters located, which the price may likely strive towards [30:53] liquidity, as I recall, includes equal extremes, cascading liquidity, range boundaries, especially on higher timeframes, and structural swing points, also especially on higher timeframes. Yes, [31:07] swing points mean structural trend points. That is, according to the trend, as a rule, yes, that is, these points that we understand that they will be updated soon, probably yes, that is, this is also a significant pool of liquidity, especially with [31:19] regard to timeframes, there from 2 to 10 hours. And then there are the old happen, yes, there are hailai that were formed a month ago, 2 trips a is, the older the high-water mark, the more [31:34] liquidity it has. And also such pools as day, or rather, the previous day's high-water mark . the previous week's highlight, the previous month's highlight, and then the quarter, half-year, year, and so on. That is, all this also applies to [31:47] when we evaluate the graph, we must understand where it is. And if there liquidity nearby, then, accordingly, working in the opposite direction is, well, not a good idea. So what do I mean ? If, mm, we see that there are [32:02] which I have already given many times today , there are equal highs, the price this range, there on a lower time frame, perhaps, yes, I, maybe, don’t even see these equal highs. For example, I have some kind of short setup forming, yes. Well, [32:17] is on top and the price is probably moving towards it . So until it's removed, yes, it That is, we also clearly consider key [32:29] liquidity as part of the context. And the last, uh, yes, the last, the last category is everything else, what I already talked about today, but it does not directly relate to what we can see on the graph. This is the news background, [32:43] context dramatically. These are trading sessions if a trader uses trading sessions, right? traders who trade only the kill zone, for example, right? trading sessions and killzones, because they are also often confused. Killzones are [32:59] specific hours within trading sessions. This is important. For example, someone New York session there, yes, and he has a certain model that he trades. That is, if this model, that is, if the trading strategy [33:12] New York and such-and-such a model, then the same model formed during Asia is, the context of this model is completely different if time is important for the trader and his strategy is tailored specifically to it. Well, and already at a more [33:27] advanced level, yes, this is an analysis of all these tools and even more. That is, we look at Bitcoin dominance, we look at intra-market correlation. divergence, that is, these are structural discrepancies, when, for example, BTC [33:41] updated the high, but, for example, Ethereum did not update it, right? That is, usually coins, that is, assets in general, that move, and move synchronously, that is, which have a high degree of correlation, then, as a rule, their structural points [33:56] Bitcoin made a high, then Ethereum also made a high. If Bitcoin forms a flat, Ethereum will also form a flat. And when a divergence in structure of this nature occurs, yes, for one asset there is an update, for another an SMS, [34:10] an septidivergence, and the divergence can potentially indicate that the market will begin to move in the opposite direction. There is also a logic to it, because it’s a long topic. That is, this is an intra-market relationship, [34:24] relationship. Today I gave an example with Dix, with SNP 500 and so on. This is funding analysis, market sentiment analysis, capitalization assessment, points that should ideally be studied separately, right? But for a [34:38] professional, this will definitely need to be done over time. And what do we have there, yes, USDT dominance, and so on, there is an assessment, I don’t know, there is open interest, and so on. [34:52] That is, here, there maybe, I don’t know, liquidation maps, everything that, yes, provide. This would fall precisely into this category. Now fall precisely into this category. Now let's focus on these, uh, [35:05] four points. Now let's move on to the graph. So, what does this particular Satan that I showed here consist of, right? That is, I had a lesson with a student. Here is an example I personally came across. And what is this setup based on? [35:19] And what is this setup based on? Look, there is, yes, an order block that removed a significant liquidity floor, which tested the imbalance on a higher timeframe, yes, we are now on the hour, that is, in my opinion, from four or even [35:33] from 12 o'clock, yes, and so it gave us, accordingly, this zone. In this area we have an imbalance. And I understand that I have targets for And I understand that I have targets for price movement. And it is likely that [35:48] after testing Orblock with imbalance, that is, the price will move towards these targets. It's a logical, yes. If I see that my liquidity is being manipulated purchase, then it is likely that further valuation of the asset will occur. That [36:02] is, here, accordingly, yes, there is a demonstration, yes, by large capital, let 's say, of some minimal, but is, that there will be a revaluation of the asset in a downward direction and that's all. That is, I [36:15] understand that this is my setup. It is built from working with liquidity. We remember, yes, that the basic statement of smartmane is that liquidity. And it is likely that having collected significant momentum, yes, from this [36:28] side and having reacted to it, we see that the price, yes, did exactly that. That is, there is impulse absorption here. With three candles here we ate about ten, probably, yes, previous ones, that is, ascending ones. Then a breakdown of the structure occurred here [36:41] , there is already a zone of bearish inefficiency. That is, I understand that everything, that is, I have such-and-such a premise, yes, such-and-such a view, such-and-such a trading idea, that from here we will go further down. But now [36:54] look, the entry point, here is the entry point - this is already a secondary matter. I can , well, enter here right away, for example, yes, take there, set the limit there at the beginning of the imbalance or at its middle, it doesn’t [37:10] matter. Then I can wait, we repeat this, we are here for an hour, yes, and I can do whatever I want here, go for at least 5 minutes, at least 15 minutes. Here, let's see what's happening with the price. when testing [37:24] testing the imbalance, for example, that here, yes, it happened, and, SMS, here, yes, it happened, and, SMS, education, SMS, here via SMS, yes, the price starts to move down. That is, if this is, let's say, my model for [37:39] lower time frame, let's say, with a stop, with a local one here. Then, as I showed here the final move, that is, I simply waited on the same hourly time frame like this This is how it is shown, in my opinion, if I haven’t gone too far . [37:55] In short, I waited for, yes, the complete closure of this traffic. That is, I imbalance has been tested. This is , of course, a bit of an aggressive in fact, the price could have gone even deeper , but overall, but at the same time, it [38:08] has a place to be here, because the test was already there 30, maybe 40% of this imbalance. That is, we probably did n’t have to go back deeper. Plus, especially if, let's say, there was an SMT divergence here, yes, there is a [38:20] discrepancy here, for example, between Bitcoin and Ethereum, then, well, it is very likely that there was no entry, and this could provide an additional plus. Well, that's a plus to my forecast, yes. Then I could wait and watch, or rather, watch the development of this [38:35] trend. And here I understand that while the price is moving here, yes, while it is moving towards my goals and while the goals are still relevant, I can work here on a lower timeframe within this trend, yes, that is, [38:48] look for some local areas of interest there, local ones, yes, look for some setups there too, yes, that is, well , these ideas of mine will be based, yes, trading precisely on the basis of this big, yes, this big situation [39:01] that I found there, for example, on an hour or on four. Here. So how you prefer. You may not have just one , there may be several of them, right? That that is, so as not to look for just one and limit yourself to just one [39:14] market situation, so that there would be an opportunity, yes, there would be some, well, let's say, a spread, yes, there would be more of these models so that it would be possible to more often, yes, more often receive code approvals. That is, how we enter here is already the [39:27] tenth matter. That is, I understand that I have point A, this order block with imbalance. Well, I have point B. That's it, the rest is just a matter of technique. Now, let 's talk about context and look at the overall context of this example. That is, [39:40] let's look at the context. First of all, what do we see here? We see that the price, what do we see here? We see that the price, yes, it moved here for some time in an upward trend ended at a certain point . At what point did it [39:55] end? So it ended after we tested this order block zone, right? This order block, on the one hand, it seems a bit inconspicuous, but nevertheless, this is an area of ​​liquidity removal, an [40:10] movement developed after this order block. That is, we arrived at this block, you see here, well, that is, the price, it was a little, yes, it was haggled over, it was unable to break through this block, and we began to move in the opposite direction. [40:23] So what happened here is that first there was a breakdown via SMS, right? Further on, the . This word structure occurred quite impulsively. Next, uh, yes, that is, this is all again, yes, in terms of [40:36] context. That is, our trend has changed. Next we'll see if we even have the potential to go, say, lower. That is, if we talk not only about, well, the main goals considered here were these, but even if we look further, we [40:49] see that okay, here we also have something more senior, let's switch somewhere. I understand that we still have an unfilled imbalance here, yes, we have it here in terms of liquidity, but this is something like, well, let's say, it has little to do with my [41:02] sertap, which I'm showing you, but evaluating this, you know, principle there is some kind of motive to go further lower, it also sometimes makes sense. That on targets. This order block has already been invalidated here. That is, [41:17] corrective, it was already a reaction to this order block. So accordingly, when I put all this together, that is, here you can connect again, yes, everything you want, volumes there and so on, and [41:31] some other analysis, yes, cluster and so on, that is also, which will , yes, and, accordingly, this whole general context, it tells me where the price will move. That is, again, yes, if I [41:43] look, let's say, like this, then even long before the composition was formed, I already see that I have a bearish order block, which worked here. That is, if there was no seller here, yes, here this [41:58] invalid, or it was somehow not build up its position, yes, then, probably, we would have passed it and not noticed. But I see that there is a price reaction here from this area of ​​interest. This means that [42:12] the buyer, or rather the seller, still has power. And now he shows this coming together. I have an idea that since we reversed here at this order block, the trend changed, then, in principle, yes, here is my [42:24] new impulse. Here it is, yes, I have a premium discount net stretched over it. Here at 12 o'clock in the premium market I have a bearish imbalance. And I understand that from a pullback, yes, that is, through a correction, we can continue, [42:40] descending. That is, I have a very general idea for now. Then this idea is confirmed by the satap, who gives me a more, [42:53] well, let's say, let's do this gradation, yes, the context is the senior idea, the initial one, then within its framework an idea of ​​a middle order is formed , which is the stage, yes, it should be composed of some already [43:06] defined clear zones of interest in liquidity and so on. And the entry point is what we are there inside this setup, how we will enter there with the goal of those targets that we, as this goal, we, in fact, have defined. Yeah.