[00:01] breaker, you must understand how to enter a trade from it and set a stop-loss. The basic and easiest way to place a limit order at its beginning.  In this case, stop loss can be either aggressive or conservative depending on the
[00:14] situation.  For example, I use an aggressive stop-loss only if the range minimum coincides with the minimum of the impulse candle that has broken through the structural lower-high.  Otherwise, I'll always go for the conservative soup-loz.  This is
[00:28] inefficiency, which is a marker of active smart money buying and their focus on further delivering the price even higher while protecting the current range.  Thus, the lower boundary of the breaker is validated for placing a
[00:44] stop-loss behind it by a bullish imbalance, which can be balanced on the very next candle, after which the growth will continue and a return to the breaker will not be expected.  This will be the second more accurate move from the breaker.   The
[00:57] full fill level, not yet confirmed imbalance, is used to open a long position, allowing for the best risk/reward ratio within a bullish setup, even with a conservative stop loss.  But this does not
[01:10] always happen.  And it happens that the inefficiency is not completely filled, but a gap remains, which the price will naturally gravitate towards.  Therefore, the entry into the transaction will be made from its beginning.  For me, this is the most
[01:23] optimal method for entering a trade. The breaker is a landmark, a key support zone, and the imbalance within it is a secondary zone that is used for better entry, both in terms of price action and timing.  The next
[01:37] input is a modification of the previous one and consists of using the volume profile on the range of inefficiency that has arisen inside the breaker. The level where the least volume was traded is highly likely to become the
[01:49] trigger for the price.  We can place a limit order blank on it.