[00:02] better than most of you modern weapons without any real depth. Learn art before trying to criticize an artist who truly understands the full scope of art like me. And so here they posted their commission graphic where it ranges from
[00:15] a basic sketch to a full complete illustration. Their basic sketch goes for 50 euros and their full illustration goes for 200 euros. This person's artwork features a lot of irregularities that you just simply wouldn't find in
[00:29] human artwork. Here we have an example of the basic sketch in which the bangs of the hair actually cut into the ear. There is a bow that is like cropped off, There is a bow that is like cropped off, I think. And then the hair also blends
[00:43] into the clothing and there is one drawstring for a shirt that doesn't have a hood. Now we have the simple color for 100 euros where the two earrings don't match. She is cross-eyed and there are odd crunchy detailing happening in the
[00:58] odd crunchy detailing happening in the hair. For 150 euros you can go and get the detailed color where we again have hair strands that melt into the clothing, more hair strands melting into the clothing, an ear that is floating
[01:10] because the bang is like also melting into the ear. We can have a detailed into the ear. We can have a detailed scene for 180 euros where there are mismatched floating string lights that are like mushed against the wall and
[01:22] framed pictures that have absolute garbage in it. Or for 200 euros get a complete illustration and our character is turned into a witch and there is
[01:34] bacteria in the sky. That's like the best way I can describe it. And she's looks like it's supposed to be the same girl from sketch all the way to complete illustration except it's like not the same character because the hair color
[01:47] and texture changes frame by frame but only just slightly to where maybe it's the same character but like she used a hair curler in this picture. You know buying it in the comment section. I don't want to get into any trouble or
[02:00] stolen art? Knowing the AI takes images and art from the internet to fuse them into a single image, wouldn't that mean the illegitimate use of previous works? want. And OP says, "No, it's a lot of
[02:13] work." Another person says, "200 euros for a product not made by you?" And OP says, "It is made by me." Homie, just because you went into ChatGPT and prompted up an image doesn't mean you actually drew it yourself. So, somebody
[02:25] else took their prompt and then redid it, I guess, in their variation with would I pay you when in 30 seconds I can get the same thing for free?" And then OP says, "Wow, you're clearly stealing from me."