---
title: 'Starship Flight 13 Launch Window Revealed & China''s Long March 9 Challenge'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=Di189yxL7Mo'
video_id: 'Di189yxL7Mo'
date: 2026-08-11
duration_sec: 1097
---

# Starship Flight 13 Launch Window Revealed & China's Long March 9 Challenge

> Source: [Starship Flight 13 Launch Window Revealed & China's Long March 9 Challenge](https://youtube.com/watch?v=Di189yxL7Mo)

## Summary

SpaceX has revealed the official launch window for Starship Flight 13, targeting mid-July, which is earlier than expected. The video also covers preparations at Starbase's Pad 2 and Pad 1, and compares China's Long March 9 rocket concept to Starship, analyzing its potential and challenges.

### Key Points

- **Flight 13 Launch Window Announced** [00:14] — The FAA released updated documentation on July 7th, listing July 14th as the primary launch opportunity with backup dates through July 21st. Some documents show July 15th due to time zone differences. Launch time is around 5:45 p.m. Central.
- **Ship 40 Readiness** [02:21] — Ship 40 (S40) has completed both single-engine and full six-engine static fire tests. Remaining work includes inspections, final integration, payload installation, and fitting the flight termination system before rollout.
- **Booster 20 Timeline** [03:15] — Booster 20 (B20) needs to be moved to the pad, conduct defiring, review data, and prepare for flight, which takes at least a couple of days. It then returns to Megabay for inspections and FTS installation, making the schedule tight.
- **Pad 2 Upgrades** [04:02] — Pad 2 has completed water deluge testing and is now focusing on upper launch systems. The BQD completed a full series of operational tests, and the chopsticks received a new damper system, possibly replacing hydraulic drives with electric components for smoother movement.
- **Pad 1 Reconstruction** [05:08] — Pad 1 is rebuilding its orbital launch mount and frame trench. A new ground support equipment gantry frame is taking shape, and the ship QD arm extension was removed, likely to accommodate the larger V3 Starship design.
- **Long March 9 Introduction** [06:13] — China's Long March 9 is a super-heavy launch system intended for enormous payloads and future missions beyond Earth orbit. It is seen as China's answer to Starship and SLS.
- **Long March 9 Size and Fairing** [07:42] — The Long March 9 is estimated to be 135-140 meters tall, taller than Starship's 123 meters. Its payload fairing could be 16 meters in diameter and 50 meters long, potentially fitting portions of Starship's upper stage inside.
- **Booster and Propellant** [09:03] — The booster is estimated to be 10-11 meters in diameter and up to 90 meters tall. It will use the YF-215 Methalox engine, the same propellant combination as Starship, offering advantages like cleaner burning and potential Mars production.
- **Payload Capacity and Implications** [10:06] — Projections suggest Long March 9 could carry approximately 150 tons to low Earth orbit, compared to Long March 5's 25 tons. This is aimed at constructing infrastructure and large lunar systems.
- **Manufacturing Facility** [11:05] — A dedicated manufacturing facility for Long March 9 could cover 100,000 square meters with a gateway 85 meters high, featuring separate manufacturing and assembly areas, similar to SpaceX's Gigabay concepts.
- **Reusability Concepts** [12:00] — Diagrams suggest future variants of Long March 9 could be fully reusable, with an upper stage equipped with aerodynamic flaps for atmospheric descent control.
- **Challenges for Long March 9** [12:52] — Concerns include balance and aerodynamics due to the large fairing, staging efficiency, and uncertainty about reusability. Without reusability, operating costs become harder to control.
- **Starship's Strategy** [14:20] — SpaceX is focusing on improving performance across the board rather than dramatically increasing dimensions. Current targets are ~100 tons to orbit, with future variants possibly reaching 150 meters tall.
- **Starship's Reusability Advantage** [15:20] — Starship's defining feature is rapid and complete reusability, aiming for minimal downtime between missions. This could increase launch frequency, reduce costs, and make planetary transportation practical.
- **Starship's Flexible Architecture** [16:21] — Starship can be adapted into cargo carriers, orbital tankers, lunar landers, space station modules, and Mars habitats, creating an ecosystem that is difficult to compete against.
- **Competition Outcome** [17:17] — The ultimate competition will be decided by reliability, economic efficiency, launch frequency, operational flexibility, and reusability, where SpaceX currently has strong advantages.

### Conclusion

While Long March 9 is a bold concept, it faces significant challenges in aerodynamics, staging, and reusability. The competition between super-heavy rockets will drive innovation, but SpaceX's focus on reusability and operational efficiency gives it a strong edge.

## Transcript

SpaceX has finally revealed some insane news. The official launch window for Starship Flight 13.
And it's even more aggressive than almost anyone expected. If the schedule holds, this could mark one of the fastest Starship turnaround campaigns in the program's history. Let's dive into all of it on today's episode of GreatSpaceX to find out.
If you've been following SpaceX lately, you've probably noticed that everything seems to be moving at double speed. One day Starship is testing, the next day new launch dates appear, and before you can catch up, Falcon 9 is already launching another record-breaking mission.
Trying to keep up sometimes feels like binge-watching an entire TV series in one weekend. That's exactly why we cover these updates every day. And if you haven't subscribed yet, now's the perfect time, because the next few weeks could be some of the busiest in Starship history.
Let's start with the biggest headline, Starship Flight 13, the long-awaited launch window has finally appeared. On July 7th, the Federal Aviation Administration released updated documentation for Flight 13, giving us our clearest look yet at SpaceX's current launch plans.
According to the FAA documents, July 14th is listed as the primary launch opportunity, with backup dates extending through July 21st. Some documentation shows July 15th instead, but that's simply the result of time zone differences rather than conflicting schedules.
Either way, SpaceX is targeting the middle of July instead of the end of the month, which surprised almost everyone following the program. Launch time remains around 5.45 p.m. Central, continuing SpaceX's preference for late afternoon launches that allow daylight visibility during both booster recovery operations and ship reentry.
That's an ambitious schedule. Not long ago, many observers, including myself, expected Flight 13 to slip toward the final week of July. Instead, SpaceX appears eager to move much sooner.
So when do you think Flight 13 will actually launch? Will it fly on the very first day of the window or slide toward the back updates? Let me know your thoughts and predictions in the comment section down below. But before you make any predictions, though, it's worth asking a more important question.
Can SpaceX realistically have the vehicle ready in time? As Fordy is already in excellent shape, it successfully completed both its single-engine and full six-engine static fire tests at the end of June and the beginning of July.
Those major milestones are now behind it. The remaining work includes inspections, final integration, payload installation, and fitting the flight termination system before rollout to the launch pad. An interesting clue appeared on July 7th.
Observers spotted the payload loader arriving at Star Factory where it will likely receive the simulated version 3 Starlink payloads before transporting them to Megabay 2 for installation inside S-40's payload dispenser.
Once that process is complete and the FTS is installed, S40 should be ready for launch operations. Then, there's B20.
Moving the booster to the pad, conducting defiring, reviewing the data, and preparing it for flight normally takes at least a couple of days. Afterwards, SpaceX typically returns the booster to Megabay for inspections and installation of the flight termination system.
That alone makes the schedule incredibly tight. That approach would save valuable time and keep Flight 13 on schedule. The next week could easily become one of the busiest we've seen at Starbase. Hardware could move with very little warning, and testing might happen almost overnight.
Personally, if I had to make a prediction today, I'd lean toward the latter part of the launch window. July 20th seems like a realistic target that still allows SpaceX enough flexibility if unexpected issues arise. Of course, I'd love to be proven wrong if they somehow launched even earlier.
The launch vehicle isn't the only thing receiving attention. Pad 2 has also entered an intensive preparation phase. After several rounds of water deluge testing, engineers have shifted their focus toward the upper launch systems.
Recently, the BQD completed another full series of operational tests, including opening, extending the interface, Persian connections retracting and closing once again. Meanwhile the chopsticks have quietly received an important upgrade A new damper system has been installed and the mechanism now appears significantly smoother than before Many observers also believe SpaceX has replaced portions
of the previous hydraulic drive system with electric components. Whether that's entirely accurate remains to be confirmed, but one thing is obvious. The chopsticks now move with noticeably greater precision and much less vibration.
That's not just satisfying to watch, It's exactly the kind of refinement needed for reliable lifting and, eventually, catching Starship vehicles. There's probably enough to discuss, therefore, an entire episode by itself.
While Pad 2 prepares for immediate operations, Pad 1 continues its own transformation. Construction crews remain focused on rebuilding the orbital launch mount and frame trench infrastructure. The new ground support equipment gantry frame is taking shape alongside the trench, after which crews will install extensive plumbing that connects the frame bucket, BQD systems, and launch mount hardware.
Protective cladding will follow before major launch interfaces begin returning. Higher up the tower, another interesting change has appeared. SpaceX recently removed the ship QD arm extension. The most likely explanation is simple.
The existing system isn't optimized for the larger V3 Starship design. A replacement better suited to future vehicles is almost certainly on the way. PAT-1 may still be months away from returning to service, but progress is becoming increasingly visible.
Its eventual comeback will provide SpaceX with another critical launch site as Starship flight frequency continues increasing. For years, the title of the world's biggest and most powerful rocket has belonged to one vehicle.
Starship. But spaceflight is never short on competition. And this time, the challenger comes from China. Not with a small rocket, not even with a Falcon Heavy rival, but with a concept that could eventually surpass Starship in size.
A rocket known as Long March 9. Can China really build a rocket larger than Starship? Could it eventually challenge SpaceX? And perhaps most importantly, does bigger actually mean better?
Over the past several years, discussions about China's space industry have often focused on its rapidly growing private sector. But while private companies often grab headlines, China's state-backed space program continues advancing its own ambitious projects.
And among those projects, two rockets stand above the rest, Long March 10 and Long March 9. Long March 10 is designed primarily for lunar missions. It is expected to support China's crewed moon landing efforts later this decade.
Long March 9, however, is a completely different beast. This vehicle is intended to become China's super-heavy launch system, a rocket designed for enormous payloads, massive infrastructure, and future missions beyond Earth orbit.
In many ways, it represents China's answers to Starship, SLS, and other super-heavy launch systems. And recent updates suggest China's ambitions may be even larger than previously expected. The newest Long March 9 concept has revealed several surprising design choices.
The first thing people noticed was its sheer size. When compared visually with Starship renderings, the Long March 9 appears slightly taller. Current estimates place its height somewhere between 135 and 140 meters.
For comparison, Starship currently stands around 123 meters tall. That difference may not sound dramatic at first, but in rocketry, adding another dozen meters is no small achievement. It's the equivalent of looking at an already gigantic skyscraper
and deciding it needs another few floors just because. Then there's the payload fairing, and this is where things become truly extraordinary. According to released illustrations, the fairing could reach a diameter of approximately 16 meters.
That would make it significantly wider than Starship. Its length could approach 50 meters. To put that into perspective, the fairing alone appears almost as long as the Starship's upper stage. If properly arranged, portions of Starship's upper section could theoretically fit inside that fairing.
That is an astonishing amount of volume. In the space industry, payload volume can be just as important as payload mass. A giant fairing allows larger satellites, larger space station modules, larger lunar infrastructure, and potentially entire systems
that would otherwise require multiple launches. Another interesting feature is what appears to be an enormous single booster stage beneath the fairing. The booster seems wider than super heavy. Some estimates place its diameter between 10 and 11 meters.
Its height could approach 90 meters If those estimates prove accurate this would become one of the largest rocket boosters ever built The design suggests that most of its volume would be dedicated to propellant storage, and that makes sense. When your payload fairing looks large enough to hide a small
apartment complex, you need a tremendous amount of fuel underneath it. The rocket is expected to use China's YF-215 Methalox engine. Methalox, for anyone unfamiliar, refers to methane and liquid oxygen. Coincidentally, or perhaps not so coincidentally, that is the same propellant
combination used by Starship. Methane offers several important advantages over traditional rocket fuel. It burns relatively cleanly, which can help simplify refurbishment and support reusability. It performs well in high-efficiency rocket engines, and it may eventually be produced
on Mars using local resources. Those advantages help explain why so many next-generation launch vehicles are adopting methane as their fuel of choice. If Long March 9 achieves its intended performance, some projections suggest payload capacity could reach approximately 150 tons to
low Earth orbit. That would place it among the most powerful rockets ever developed and potentially ahead of some current Starship targets. For China, the implications are enormous. Today, the Long March 5 is China's primary heavy lift rocket. It can place roughly 25 tons into low
Earth orbit, and that is a respectable capability. But compared to Long March 9, it would seem almost modest. Long March 9 is designed for an entirely different scale. This is not simply about launching satellites. This is about constructing infrastructure, large lunar systems, massive deep space missions,
and potentially supporting long-term plans involving the Moon and Mars. As nations begin thinking beyond individual missions and toward permanent off-world operations, rockets of this become increasingly important.
The larger the payload and the fewer launches required, the simpler the overall mission architecture becomes. But China's ambitions extend beyond the rocket itself. Several reports have suggested plans for a dedicated manufacturing facility
designed specifically for Long March 9 production. According to available information, the facility could cover approximately 100,000 square meters. That is a massive industrial footprint.
The structure reportedly includes a gateway reaching approximately 85 meters in height, large enough for enormous rocket sections to pass through. Visualizations show a facility with separate manufacturing and assembly areas.
One portion appears dedicated to fabrication. Another resembles the towering assembly buildings used for vehicle stacking. The similarities to SpaceX's Gigabay concepts are difficult to ignore. Apparently, giant rockets require giant buildings.
Who could have guessed? At this point, aerospace engineering increasingly resembles industrial-scale architecture with occasional explosions. Additional information suggests Long March 9 may eventually evolve into multiple configurations.
Some diagrams indicate a three-stage version. Others suggest future variants could transition toward fully reusable designs. One particularly interesting illustration shows an upper stage equipped with aerodynamic flaps.
That feature immediately caught attention because flaps are not added for decoration. They serve an important purpose, control during atmospheric descent. In other words, China appears to be studying pathways toward reusable operations.
That is significant. Very few organizations in the world are seriously pursuing complete reusability at this scale. The fact that China is openly exploring such concepts demonstrates how much the industry has changed
since SpaceX began proving reusable boosters could actually work. Of course, having an ambitious design is only the beginning. There are still many questions surrounding Long March 9, and some of them are substantial.
The first concern involves balance and aerodynamics. That enormous fairing creates a vehicle with an unusual appearance. A very large upper section sitting atop a gigantic booster.
The mass distribution could present challenges during both manufacturing and flight operations. Large structures bring complexity, and complexity often introduces risk. The next issue involves staging.
Based on currently available concepts, some configurations appear to emphasize simplicity. But rockets traditionally use multiple stages for good reason. Each stage performs efficiently within a specific portion of flight.
The largest stage handles the dense lower atmosphere. Smaller upper stages continue the journey after much of the vehicle's mass has already been discarded. That process improves efficiency If Long March 9 relies too heavily on a massive single stage approach for portions of its mission profile it may sacrifice performance advantages normally gained through
staging. Reusability also remains uncertain. Current concepts do not clearly demonstrate a fully reusable operational system, and without reusability, operating costs become much harder to control. Building enormous rockets is expensive. Building a new enormous rocket for every launch is
even more expensive. History has repeatedly demonstrated this lesson. The space shuttle struggled with cost as less faces criticism over cost. Meanwhile, SpaceX continues pushing Starship forward, and that creates a very different competitive landscape. Starship is currently
progressing through its third major generation. Rather than dramatically increasing the vehicle's overall dimensions, SpaceX has focused much of its effort on improving performance across the board. This includes increasing payload capability, upgrading engine performance, refining the vehicle's structure, and improving operational efficiency.
As part of that strategy, the company is targeting payload capacities of roughly 100 tons to low Earth orbit during the current phase of development. And future versions may go much further. Musk has discussed concepts that could eventually stretch Starship's dimensions significantly.
Some projects suggest future variants could reach heights approaching 150 meters. If that occurs, the size advantage currently discussed for Long March 9 may become much smaller or disappear entirely.
Because when SpaceX sees another rocket getting larger, their usual response seems to be, interesting, hmm, what if we made ours bigger too? More importantly, SpaceX continues focusing on rapid and complete reusability.
That remains Starship's defining feature. Not its height, not its diameter, not even its payload capacity, its reusability. The ultimate goal is not simply to launch cargo into space. The goal is to create a transportation system capable of flying again and again with minimal downtime between missions.
The goal is to create a transportation system, a vehicle capable of flying repeatedly with only minimal refurbishment. That capability has the potential to change everything. It could dramatically increase launch frequency, reduce operating costs, improve mission flexibility,
accelerate the deployment of large-scale infrastructure, and eventually make planetary transportation far more practical. Even if another rocket matches Starship's tailored performance, achieving comparable reusability is an entirely different challenge,
one that remains largely unproven throughout the industry. Starship also benefits from a uniquely flexible upper-stage architecture. The vehicle is designed with versatility in mind and can be adapted into a variety of specialized variants.
These could include cargo carriers, orbital tankers, lunar landers, potential space station modules, and perhaps even future habitats intended for missions to Mars. This flexibility allows one core design to support many mission types.
That creates efficiencies beyond raw launch performance. It creates an ecosystem, and ecosystems are difficult to compete against. Ultimately, Long March 9 represents one of the boldest rocket concepts China has ever revealed.
Its enormous fairing, impressive projected payload capacity, future reusable concepts, and the industrial infrastructure being developed around it all point in the same direction. They reflect a nation pursuing increasingly ambitious objectives in space,
and they suggest that those ambitions extend far beyond a single launch vehicle. The design demonstrates that China is no longer focused solely on reaching orbit. It's increasingly focused on what can be built and accomplished once it gets there.
But surpassing Starship remains an entirely different challenge. Size, payload, and even raw power is not enough. The ultimate competition will likely be decided by reliability, economic efficiency, launch frequency, operational flexibility, and reusability.
Those are the areas where SpaceX currently maintains some of its strongest advantages. So while Long March 9 may become one of the most powerful rockets ever built, it still has a long road ahead before it can truly challenge Starship's overall position.
Still, competition is rarely a bad thing. Every major rival pushes innovation forward, And if Long March 9 succeeds, the coming decade could become one of the most exciting periods in aerospace history, a period where multiple super-heavy rockets compete to carry humanity farther than ever before.
And honestly, as space fans, that's probably the kind of rivalry we all want to watch. And that brings us to the end of today's episode. Thank you so much for tuning in. As always, this has been Kevin from GreatSpaceX.
And until next time, keep looking up.