[00:01] contest for a garden mascot in my city. The cheek shading overlapping the face watering can, and the way the tail seems to blend into the body rather than pass behind it makes me think it's AI." Wait, so we have a little worm with a little
[00:14] coming out of the worm and it's wearing a hat. It's got a cute little chibi face I mean, look at this. Let's see a couple of things, you know, we have the tail going behind the body. It makes sense the path the tail is like taking. I see
[00:27] but this could also just be like going then the blush thing coming out of the line, that's like a stylistic choice. the blush completely coming off the face. The lines not being completed for
[00:39] cuz it's done throughout the piece. It's done here as well. It's done for this interesting is that there's like one black iris for one eye and it's not a stylistic choice because it looks like they're mixing a lot of colors. Without
[00:53] don't want to call this piece AI because we don't really have more examples. This top comment says, "This is real. It's just their art style and I've seen before quite frequently." Another person says, "Doesn't look like AI to me. Not
[01:08] license to be creative. Also checks for watermarks and returned none. Would be it's your own work." Another person says, "We've got to stop thinking that illustrations are AI. It will have a chilling effect on the art that you see
[01:23] more mechanical and soulless as a result." And they added example of Richard Scary's work, which is very stylized, very cartoonish, and super definitely not AI cuz this was done eons before AI was a thing. And another
[01:35] converted to a vector image from a raster image using some tools that kind of traced the original. Very likely not AI." So the vote for this one was not AI." So the vote for this one was not AI.