---
title: '✂ COMO FAZER E MONETIZAR CORTES E USAR TRECHOS DE FILMES SEM VIOLAR REGRAS DE DIREITO AUTORAL!'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=iO8yvNPftKQ'
video_id: 'iO8yvNPftKQ'
date: 2026-07-06
duration_sec: 0
---

# ✂ COMO FAZER E MONETIZAR CORTES E USAR TRECHOS DE FILMES SEM VIOLAR REGRAS DE DIREITO AUTORAL!

> Source: [✂ COMO FAZER E MONETIZAR CORTES E USAR TRECHOS DE FILMES SEM VIOLAR REGRAS DE DIREITO AUTORAL!](https://youtube.com/watch?v=iO8yvNPftKQ)

## Summary

This video provides a definitive guide on how to edit and monetize video content without violating copyright laws, focusing on Brazilian copyright rules and platform policies like YouTube. The speaker, a digital law specialist, explains the importance of obtaining prior and express authorization, adding original content to edits, and understanding fair use to avoid strikes or legal action.

### Key Points

- **Video Purpose** [00:02] — The video explains how to know which channels allow editing, how to use videos, and how to create edits without violating copyright rules, including monetization rules.
- **Platform Differences** [00:48] — Each social network handles copyright differently; TikTok is more disorganized, while YouTube has strict detection algorithms that block monetization at upload.
- **Market Profitability** [01:48] — Content editing is profitable, but starting with a solid foundation is crucial to avoid channel blocking or labeling as reused content.
- **Algorithm Errors** [02:30] — Platforms can make mistakes; if you have authorization, seek a specialized lawyer. There are court decisions ordering channel reinstatement.
- **Myth of Small Excerpts** [03:13] — The idea that using small excerpts (15-40 seconds) is free is a myth; there is no clear definition, and posting without permission can lead to strikes.
- **First Rule: Research** [04:09] — Identify the podcast or channel, analyze its description, and look for authorization and rules for edits. Do not assume content is public.
- **Legal Basis** [04:55] — Article 29 of Law 9610 (Brazilian Copyright Law) requires prior and express authorization for any use of a work, including partial reproduction or edits.
- **Authorization Types** [06:43] — Some channels authorize edits, use Creative Commons, or share revenue. Respect rules like 24-hour waiting periods to avoid strikes.
- **Originality Requirement** [07:22] — To monetize, you must add original content (music, comments, reactions) to create a derivative work that qualifies as acceptable use.
- **Fair Use Factors** [08:27] — Courts analyze four factors: purpose/character, nature of work, amount used, and effect on market. Activities like criticism, commentary, news reporting may qualify.
- **Avoiding Slavish Copying** [10:04] — Adding sufficient originality distinguishes your edit from a faithful copy. Pure excerpts without transformation can be considered slavish copying.
- **Legal Consequences** [10:46] — Violating rules can lead to civil liability, removal demands, royalty payments, or conversion of monetization. Seek a lawyer if your channel is wrongly taken down.

### Conclusion

To monetize edits legally, always obtain prior and express authorization, add original content to ensure fair use, and respect platform rules. If your channel is wrongly penalized, consult a digital law specialist.

## Transcript

lawyer specializing in digital law. Look, this video is definitive: how to know which channels allow editing, how to use videos, how to create edits without violating copyright rules, and I'm going to show
copyright rules, and I'm going to show you the rules related to monetization, what to do and what not to do, what you'll do that will be a failure if you intend to make edits, and what you can do to
edits, and what you can do to monetize legally without violating Brazilian copyright rules and the rules and usage policies of the rules and usage policies of YouTube or other social networks.
I immediately make a reservation here because each social network handles the issue in a different way. TikTok, for example, is a bit disorganized. We have a series of news reports from copyright companies asking for stricter
monitoring algorithms because they were allowing the monetization of copies of services that we call reused or duplicated content, however you want to call it. And many people monetize today, but that has changed. It's necessary to add some
elements. Other more established networks are tightening the net, like YouTube itself. We here, who advocate for copyright holders of podcasts, We know that YouTube itself has
very skillful detection algorithms, some of which detect content at upload time, blocking monetization. This doesn't constitute a strike; the revenue from that video goes to the copyright holder, who has already
are duplicated and whether they will accept this duplication or issue a strike on your channel. Therefore, it's logical that the market for content editing is very profitable. We serve a number of authorized people here who do
a very good and honest job, but if you intend to start, start with a solid foundation. Nothing is more difficult than having 1000 subscribers, 4000 hours of viewing time, and having your channel blocked or labeled as violating
reuse rules or reused content. For many here, that means blocking, right? In other words, you need to create another channel. There are errors on the part of the platforms, and if you have authorization and haven't violated
the concept of acceptable use, seek a specialized lawyer. There are a number of decisions against these platforms, including this one, which ordered the reinstatement of the channel and the
unblocking of any blocked AdSense, under penalty of a daily fine. Algorithms make mistakes, and these companies must prove why they did so. This is very important, but aside from the issue of errors, which is a topic for
other videos, I ask that you subscribe to this channel. Exclusive content, the biggest channel on digital law and cybercrimes on YouTube. Here you will learn what you have to do to monetize. How it used to work:
download it, or make a screen recorder of it, edit it, and add small excerpts, believing in that maxim of 15 seconds, 40 seconds, or a minute that is free. I don't know where people get that from;
it's a myth. There is no clear definition of small excerpts; the jurisprudence itself changes regarding this. You posted it, and it monetized. Today, this goes to the Producer's panel, and the producer will report it, or the
algorithm itself will report it, and if you get strikes, you lose your channel. Why do we, as producers, advocate for producers? We are very attentive to cuts. First, there are malicious cuts; there are cuts that don't
wait a minimum time; there are cuts that distort speech, and what happens? These producers started to have civil liability, they started to be sued, that's why today there's a basic rule: I want to monetize
edits without violating copyright rules. First point: you identify: What is the podcast? What is the channel? Analyze the interviews on that channel, observe the channel's description, go to the channel's "about" section, go to the video description on the channel, and
go to the video description on the channel, and try to identify the authorization and rules for edits on that channel. But miracle, but with what authority? With what authority do I have to follow the rules? I've seen people telling me, "Well, if it's
on the internet, it's public, I can post it." That's the biggest nonsense, the biggest stupidity on earth. You see comments here in that sense; they're stupid people who haven't studied, right? That concept doesn't exist. I'll show you here:
I'll show you here: Article 29 of Law 9610, the copyright law, Article 29 of Law 9610, the copyright law, of the author for the use of the work in any form, whether
partial reproduction, edits, or in its entirety, or other forms of use, including any other modalities that exist or may be invented. So, my friend, don't fall for the
stupidity of believing people who don't understand anything here who say, "Oh, it's public."  You can use it, you just can't appropriate it. So, if you haven't identified the rules, the rule is to send a message. Notice that Law 9610,
article 29, says that authorization must be prior and express. This means that I cannot post beforehand, and it means that there is no tacit authorization. In other words, "Oh, if he didn't say anything, it means he's allowing it"—nonsense! You'll get sued.
producers are doing today. There are producers and producers. There are producers who allow everything, let people monetize, let
people grow. Then the person gets 1, 2, 3 sponsors, another form of monetization, and when they're big, boom, comes the lawsuit demanding metrics all the time, demanding monetization, breach of confidentiality, and suing the
sponsors. It's ridiculous, it happens. Okay, I've seen this defending these people from cuts because they thought that because it wasn't expressly prohibited, it was allowed, right? I don't know where they got that from. So, the
first rule is to research. Second, have authorization, and if you don't have authorization published there, try sending a message for authorization. So,
check this context. There are channels that authorize.  There are channels that don't authorize it, some use Creative Commons, and some use commercial licenses. They will share the revenue from your channel with you, and then there are
channels that authorize it after 24 hours. Respect that, otherwise you'll get a strike Respect that, otherwise you'll get a strike and other legal action. Okay, so the fact that it's not explicitly stated that they authorize it doesn't give you a free pass to take the
content and publish it. Now, if the person shared it, if they encourage editing, if they have a Discord community for editing, if they put it in the description, do it within the parameters. But how are you going to copy it and produce edits? No, because
people would produce multiple edits, we would have many identical videos, many identical videos. YouTube doesn't want that. So, in order to monetize on YouTube, you need to establish a certain
originality that characterizes what we call acceptable use. So it's very important that you take a video that authorizes it, and then you copy, paste, make that edit, and in that edit you will insert your
own content, what people call masking—music, comments, a reaction. It can be at the beginning, in the middle, or at the end, but you will give it your originality so that the edited segment...  It doesn't have to be 100% or
predominant, but there should be your participation, giving that video a novelty, even if derivative, that characterizes the acceptable use that exists on the platforms. I bring it to you here, look, the best known is
acceptable use, this is YouTube. The courts analyze four factors to determine if the use is acceptable: purpose, character, nature of the work, amount and importance of the part used in relation to the work, and the effect of the
use on the possible market or value of the copyrighted work. Some activities that may qualify as acceptable use include criticism, commentary, news reporting. Acceptable use serves to promote
freedom of expression. So these are the exceptions to respects copyright and videos that they are producing or have authorization for. So I've seen people
saying, "Don't use TV material, that 'll cause problems, right? Don't use this, don't use that." Nonsense, nonsense. If you're doing a critique, a news report, a reaction, a commentary, how many channels are doing that? Or even a cut with
your reaction, with a change, that can be accepted. Okay? So I've shown you how you can achieve this.  To monetize content and create edits without legal copyright issues, it 's crucial to have authorization. This
authorization must be explicit and given in advance. It's not enough to just post something; asking for permission first is important. If you don't see it published, check other factors or send a message. Even then, to avoid
your channel being labeled as reusing content, you need to include original content, make an edit, a comment, a reaction, a statement, or something in your edit that provides sufficient originality
to distinguish it from a faithful copy or a slavish copy. Because, let's face it, it would be very easy for these parasites to open CapCut, open Vegas, copy, paste, publish, and even profit from it. And that's what YouTube wants to avoid, under
penalty of a channel receiving a strike or other copyright problems for these content creators, which doesn't preclude legal action against channels legal action against channels that monetize by violating the rules.
content creators have show them what is irregular, which can generate civil liability. They can demand removal and payment of royalties for the content that was
displayed or conversion of monetization. Something common, and for people who do editing, if you are within these rules and have a problem with your channel or account, for example, without any justification,
authorized content is banned, or your monetization is withheld, or your entire channel is taken down, seek a lawyer specializing in digital law. There are many arbitrary errors by these networks that take entire channels down
without proof, without justification, without giving the right to defense, violating their own rules and not only removing the content identified as potentially violating, but effectively taking everything down. Which is extremely
unfair, and the judiciary is there for that. I hope you never reach that point, even though the networks make many mistakes. Therefore, it is up to us here, as content producers of edits, to be attentive to these rules,
analyze it on Google Images to see what the rights are, just as I will use a video and put in a distinctive sufficiency in that video, editing, not using the entire work, not changing it, not making a critique, not making an analysis, but
simply a pure excerpt, can characterize slavish copying. In the same way, you have to know that the network...  You ca n't violate your own rules and take away your monetization, withhold money you've earned, or make it impossible for you to
are several cases. Reread and review this content, and here I direitod digital.adv so that you can reread and share this content, which is also written as "share," so more people
may need it. Don't forget to subscribe to the channel; this content is weekly and sure that you, as a content creator, have a lot to contribute, and we enrich the debate because comments are part of this
exchange of information that we do here. A hug and until next time.