--- title: '¡KICK es mejor que TWITCH! El plan para ganarle a la plataforma morada' source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=72Bp6m9v5wc' video_id: '72Bp6m9v5wc' date: 2026-08-08 duration_sec: 557 channel: 'Almich' --- # ¡KICK es mejor que TWITCH! El plan para ganarle a la plataforma morada > Source: [¡KICK es mejor que TWITCH! El plan para ganarle a la plataforma morada](https://youtube.com/watch?v=72Bp6m9v5wc) ## Summary This video analyzes the competitive dynamics between streaming platforms Kick and Twitch, arguing that Kick's aggressive revenue-sharing model is a deliberate strategy funded by its parent company, Stake, a major online casino. The creator draws parallels to Amazon's historical tactic of undercutting competitors to acquire them, and warns streamers to treat platforms as business partners rather than allies. ### Key Points - **Kick's Promise vs. Twitch's Constraints** [00:03] — Kick offers 95% revenue share and total freedom, while Twitch, owned by Amazon, must be profitable for shareholders, leading to 50/50 splits and ad interruptions. - **Kick as a Billboard for Stake** [01:07] — Kick operates as a marketing vehicle for Stake, a betting site, viewing streamers and audiences as cheap traffic for its casino, hence its willingness to operate at a loss. - **The Diapers.com Analogy** [01:32] — The creator recounts how Amazon deliberately sold diapers at a loss to suffocate competitor diapers.com, eventually acquiring it, drawing a parallel to Kick's strategy against Twitch. - **Dumping as a Business Strategy** [03:03] — Kick's generous terms are described as textbook dumping—offering unsustainable benefits to undercut a rival that must be profitable, making Twitch appear stingy by comparison. - **Kick's Financial Backing** [03:43] — Kick does not need to be profitable because Stake, the world's largest online casino, funds the war of attrition, covering losses that would otherwise be unsustainable. - **Inflated Numbers and Psychological Warfare** [04:10] — The creator speculates that Kick may inflate viewer numbers to make Twitch look empty and convince creators to switch, though he admits lacking proof and frames it as speculation. - **Kick's Market Rise** [05:16] — By mid-2025, Kick became one of the big four streaming services, surpassing Twitch in viewing hours in specific niches, especially in the Hispanic market. - **Twitch's Desperate Rule Changes** [06:11] — Twitch reversed its strict multistreaming ban, first for partners and then for all, indicating desperation to retain creators amid Kick's competition. - **The Boomerang Effect** [06:38] — Some streamers are returning to Twitch after their Kick contracts end, citing isolation and loss of cultural relevance despite higher pay, as Twitch remains the hub for memes and conversation. - **The Diaper Story's Endgame** [07:31] — Once Amazon eliminated competition, it raised prices and closed the acquired store; similarly, if Kick wins, it will likely end its 95/5 split, and if it loses, Stake will cut funding. ### Conclusion The creator advises streamers to be mercenaries, not fans, exploiting Kick's generosity while it lasts and using multistreaming to maintain Twitch relevance, as platforms are businesses that will prioritize their own survival over creator loyalty. ## Transcript hourly wages, total freedom. Lately, KCK sounds like the promised paradise for streamers, right? I've even told you in previous videos that it's a very good option, but have you ever wondered why and how it does it? How is it possible that a new platform burns through millions in salaries while the market leader barely survives? The answer is not that they are cool. There is a dark machine pulling the strings behind the green platform. And believe me, things are murkier than I thought. To understand the play, you first have to follow the money trail. And this is where the playing field is completely tilted. On one hand you have Twitch, which is owned by Amazon, but right now that is its biggest weakness. Amazon is a public company; it has shareholders who demand results. Twitch needs to be profitable. Every dollar you get paid is a dollar they hate to lose. That's why they include 3 minutes of ads and the split is 50/50. Although, once taxes are factored in, sometimes the streamer doesn't even reach 40% of the profits. And on the other side we have Kick. Kick doesn't operate like a traditional streaming company ; it functions more like a massive billboard for Stake, the betting site behind Kick. And they don't care if the stream is losing money, they don't care about giving you 95% of the revenue. To them, you and your audience are cheap traffic for their casino. Basically, Twitch needs you to give it money to survive. In contrast, Kick has an infinite money code, so to speak. And here's where it gets interesting. Are you willing to burn it all down just to see Twitch burn? Or well, at least what you're going for. A few days ago I was in Chile at home watching a video by [unclear - possibly "by" or "there I am"] with coffee in hand waiting to hear about video games when suddenly the subject changed to something that really freaked me out: baby diapers. And I know, it sounds really weird that this has anything to do with streaming, but bear with me a little bit , don't go, I promise you it has everything to do with it. It turns out that a few years ago there was an online store called diapers.com, owned by quitzi. They were the kings of selling diapers [music] until one day Amazon set its sights on them and, as these big companies usually do, wanted to buy them. But they said no. What did Amazon do? He activated war mode. They started selling diapers on their own website with ridiculous discounts, deliberately losing millions of dollars on every sale. As a result, Quitsi was unable to compete. They were financially suffocated, had to give up, and eventually sold the company to Jeff Bezos. And that's when it hit me: a giant with infinite money deliberately losing money to suffocate its rival. Where have I seen that before? Well, it's as clear as day. What we are experiencing in 2025 is exactly the same play, only the roles have been reversed. In this remake of the story, KCK is the new Amazon, complete with an infinite wallet. And Twitch, well, Twitch is the diaper store that's being suffocated. Ironic, think about it. Kick is applying a textbook dumping technique. That's what that business strategy is called. Offering benefits like the 955 plus partner program bonuses and other easy income streamers can have is not done for the love of art or because they are good people. It's the equivalent of selling diapers at a loss. They are deliberately operating at a loss so that Twitch, which does have an obligation to be profitable, looks like the stingy villain of the story. And this is where you, I, and half the internet have asked ourselves the same question. Where the hell does all that money come from? How can a company that gives away 95% of its revenue be profitable? The short answer is no, it's not [music]. If we do the math, that 5% isn't even enough to cover the air conditioning for the servers. But Kick doesn't need to be profitable. Kick is essentially a spectacular indiscriminately uses steak, [music] the world's largest online casino. They have plenty of money to finance this war of attrition, but the strangulation strategy doesn't stop at just money. There is another, darker tactic, one that is often whispered about: inflated numbers. You've probably noticed this. Big streamers switching from Twitch to Kick, or smaller streamers getting a direct contract with them. Overnight, their audience multiplies. Streamers who viewers on Twitch reach 15,000 viewers on KCK . And I want to be very clear about this. I don't have the proof in hand and I'm not accusing anyone of using curious. So I'm not going to sign something that I haven't fully understood. But let's analyze it within this war strategy. If your goal is to destroy the competition, you don't just need money, you need perception. Inflating the numbers artificially, if they do, makes perfect sense in this plan, because one, you make Twitch look like a ghost town. And two, and perhaps most importantly, you convince small creators that the party is over there and here only the works remain. It's pure psychological warfare. To appear as an invincible giant rival so that the rival surrenders as soon as possible. You dumping, dirty tricks, and inflated numbers is just my speculation, which in fact it is at the end of the day, but the results are there and undeniable; they are factors. The strategy worked. By mid-2025, Kick was no longer just a weird betting site; it had officially established itself as one of the big four streaming services, neck and neck with YouTube and TikTok. In fact, the killer fact is that in specific niches, and especially here in the Hispanic market, surpassed Twitch in viewing hours. Yes, very specific moments, but they are becoming more and more frequent. Something that seemed like a total absurdity a few years ago, but today is a reality. And if things continue like this, there will only be one nail left for Kick to hammer into Twitch's coffin [music], and that's the ads. The day Kick starts showing ads on its platform, it will mean it has eaten into Twitch's market share, because advertisers, who and whose numbers have actually been declining in recent years, will consider. In other words, Twitch is going to get an even smaller slice of the pie. my speculations. And what is the definitive proof that Twitch felt suffocated? In addition to looking at their numbers, look at their rules. Do you remember when Twitch strictly prohibited multistreaming? Okay, so what happened now? Do you remember when Twitch reversed this rule, except for partners? So changed it again so that partners wouldn't have any problems doing it. And all of this, obviously they didn't do this out of kindness, not at all; they did it out of desperation. It was that or lose a good portion of our creators. However, not everything is rosy on the green side, because we are experiencing a curious phenomenon at the end of 2025, something I'm going to call the boomerang effect. Many for million-dollar contracts are returning to Twitch as soon as their deals end. Why would you go back to a platform that pays you less? Because money isn't everything, at least not at this full wallet, but you feel isolated. It's a gilded cage, but Twitch, with all its flaws, still has cultural relevance. That's where memes are born, that's where the conversation is, that's where you feel famous. Many streamers realized that on Kick their bank accounts were growing, but their personal brand was slowly dying. Then we come to the million-dollar question. Should I kick myself or stay on Twitch? To answer this, diaper story. Once Amazon bought the competition and eliminated the threat, the discounts disappeared. Amazon raised prices and closed the store it had bought. The generosity lasted exactly as long as the war. And the same will happen with Kick. If Kick wins, it will undermine Twitch, creating a kind of monopoly because we agree that both YouTube and TikTok are in a league of their own. And with that, goodbye to 955. But if Kick doesn't manage to win, Steake is going to get tired of wasting money and will turn off the tap. In other words, another platform that has gone down in history. So my answer is obvious. Don't be a fan, be a mercenary. Take advantage of the fact that the giants are fighting and squeeze every last drop out of Kick, because one way or another this isn't going to last forever. Use what you earn from steak to upgrade your equipment. Use multistreaming to avoid losing relevance on Twitch, but under no circumstances. Never think that platforms are your friends. Twitch and Kick only see the business and that's all they care about. If Kek users because Twitch would disappear, believe me, they would. And if Twitch viewers to become profitable, they wouldn't hesitate to do it. The market will regulate itself sooner or later, and your job is to make sure that when this happens, your pockets are full and your community is intact. But what do you think about all this? Am I being overly paranoid, or is there some truth to what I told you comments section. Likewise, as always, any questions, complaints, or videos can be left in the comments section, on my social media, especially on Instagram where I'm more active, or if you happen to see me platform, I'd be happy to help you. I've included all the links in the description section. Thank you so much for watching this video.