---
title: 'A Pathetic Attempt to Stop Rage Bait'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=F7Mh9EK8AnI'
video_id: 'F7Mh9EK8AnI'
date: 2026-08-10
duration_sec: 73
channel: 'Артём Мазуров / Продюсер Стримеров'
---

# A Pathetic Attempt to Stop Rage Bait

> Source: [A Pathetic Attempt to Stop Rage Bait](https://youtube.com/watch?v=F7Mh9EK8AnI)

## Summary

The video criticizes the use of rage bait—a tactic where creators provoke anger and conflict to boost engagement and revenue. It argues that such content exploits viewers' attention, feeds algorithms, and contributes to a negative media environment, while also questioning the authenticity of conflicts between public figures.

### Key Points

- **Rage bait mechanics** [00:01] — Viewers think they are watching a fight, but they are actually giving attention, which translates into reach and money. This mechanic, called rage bait, makes people angrier and the blogger more popular.
- **Conflict as a growth tool** [00:13] — Conflict makes people argue, lose their nerves and time, feeding algorithms with positive signals, which forces the video to be shown more. It is a quick way to return attention to a media personality and prevent them from disappearing from the media field.
- **News hooks and audience retention** [00:26] — Many bloggers live off news hooks. Even an audience of millions will not notice a prolonged absence without such hooks. People will always find someone to conflict with, as seen in the example of Lebedev and Ivanchenko.
- **Approval of conflict content** [00:40] — If a video about a conflict was published, it means it was approved. Contracts of stars of this level always include the right to final approval of the material.
- **Criticism of negativity** [00:52] — The speaker addresses media personalities who capitalize on negativity, calling them annoying and accusing them of injecting negativity into the population. Bloggers under the speaker's management are prohibited from using such mechanics.
- **Questioning authenticity** [01:06] — The speaker questions whether those stirring up the conflict are intentionally publishing a joint post or simply trying to use the speaker.

### Conclusion

The video condemns rage bait as a harmful engagement tactic, urging creators to avoid negativity and questioning the authenticity of public conflicts.

## Transcript

being used. You think you're watching a fight, but in reality you're giving attention, which translates into reach and money.  This mechanic is called Rй Bйт.  It makes you angrier and the blogger more popular.  Its
make people argue, lose their nerves and time. feeding the algorithms with positive signals, which forces the video to be shown Conflict is a quick way [music] to return attention to a media personality and
prevent them from disappearing from the media field.  Many bloggers live off news hooks.  After all, prolonged even an audience of millions will not notice .  After all, people will always find someone to conflict between Lebedev and Ivanchenko. What am I supposed to do the whole round?
If a video about a conflict was published, it means it was approved.  After all, the contracts of stars of this level always include the right to final approval of the material.  I am addressing media personalities who are capitalizing on negativity.  You're [ __ ] annoying.
injecting negativity into the population.  Bloggers under my management are prohibited from using such mechanics.  There is already little positivity in our world.  Friends, do not advancement. Conflicts make you angrier and drain your
stirring up the conflict are intentionally publishing a joint post or are they are intentionally publishing a joint post or are they simply trying to use us?