---
title: 'Sonam Wangchuk Video Message: If I Had to Make a Deal, I Wouldn''t Have Starved for 26 Days'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=tlbi69qja94'
video_id: 'tlbi69qja94'
date: 2026-07-24
duration_sec: 89
---

# Sonam Wangchuk Video Message: If I Had to Make a Deal, I Wouldn't Have Starved for 26 Days

> Source: [Sonam Wangchuk Video Message: If I Had to Make a Deal, I Wouldn't Have Starved for 26 Days](https://youtube.com/watch?v=tlbi69qja94)

## Summary

Sonam Wangchuk, in a video message, responds to accusations that he made a deal with the Indian government to end his 26-day hunger strike. He firmly denies any deal, stating that he would not have endured such hardship if a deal was intended. The video captures his frustration and pain at being questioned about his integrity.

### Key Points

- **Questioning Integrity** [00:02] — Wangchuk expresses frustration at having to prove his integrity after a 26-day hunger strike, asking if he needs a character certificate.
- **No Deal Needed** [00:15] — He states that if he had wanted a deal, he wouldn't have sat roadside or starved for 26 days.
- **Pain of Being Questioned** [00:30] — Wangchuk's pain is evident as he is repeatedly asked why he broke his fast at the hands of Union Ministers.
- **Resignation Demand** [00:44] — Critics highlight that no assurance of Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation was given, questioning what deal was made.
- **Video Message Response** [00:56] — Wangchuk reiterates that if a deal was involved, he wouldn't have traveled from cold Ladakh to hot Delhi and sat on the roadside.
- **Anger at Skeptics** [01:10] — He expresses anger towards those who believe he made a deal, dismissing the notion entirely.

### Conclusion

Sonam Wangchuk firmly denies any deal, emphasizing that his 26-day hunger strike was genuine and broken only after receiving assurances, not a deal.

## Transcript

I still have to prove my [musical] integrity after all these days of hunger strike ?  Do I still need to get a character certificate from someone?  If I had to make a deal, I would not have remained hungry for 26 days. I am being asked what the deal was ?  Wangchuk said that if the deal was to be done,
I did not need to sit on the road [music] side. If the deal had to be done then there was no need for me to remain hungry for 26 days. Even today I am being asked what the deal was?  Why did I break my fast at the hands of Union Ministers
?  So this pain of Wangchuk is clearly visible.  In fact, many people are questioning him as to what kind of deal was made with the Central Government ministers that Sonam Wangchuk broke his fast. Especially this issue is being
raised prominently that when the assurance of resignation of Dharmendra Pradhan was not given by the Union Ministers, then
deal was made?  So many types of questions are being raised on him at this time.  And answering those questions, Sonam Wangchuk released this video message. He said that I am being asked again and again that what kind of deal has been made?  If
I had to make a deal, I would not have come from the cold place of Ladakh and sat on the roadside in the hot environment of Delhi. come from the cold place of Ladakh and sat on the roadside in the hot environment of Delhi. anger towards those people who have this kind of thinking.