---
title: '4 Tech Experts Debate PC Questions!'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ro6RIKgs2mw'
video_id: 'Ro6RIKgs2mw'
date: 2026-06-29
duration_sec: 1474
---

# 4 Tech Experts Debate PC Questions!

> Source: [4 Tech Experts Debate PC Questions!](https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ro6RIKgs2mw)

## Summary

LTT writers debate 4 tech questions: Linux migration barriers, console exclusivity, 8GB VRAM adequacy, and used hardware risk. They discuss decision paralysis vs. fear, the predatory nature of exclusives, the future-proofing issue with 8GB VRAM, and the risk vs. value of used hardware.

### Key Points

- **Barriers to switching to Linux** [0:24] — Fear of doing something wrong, decision paralysis (too many distros), comfort with known systems, and general laziness are the main reasons people avoid Linux.
- **Console exclusives: mostly negative** [3:04] — Exclusives are predatory and limit consumer choice. The only theoretical pro is driving competition, but cons outweigh it. Modern hardware similarity and cloud gaming reduce the need for exclusives.
- **8GB VRAM adequacy depends on resolution** [5:14] — At 1080p, 8GB is fine; at 1440p or 4K, 10-12GB is needed. It's not future-proof for 2-3 years, but upscalers (e.g., DLSS) can extend lifespan. If already have 8GB, ride it out; if upgrading, consider more.
- **Used hardware risk vs. value** [6:32] — Buying used is generally acceptable for informed consumers, especially if they check for physical damage and usage history. However, the used market has worsened due to inflated prices and lack of warranty. Hard drives are risky, but recertified drives with warranty are a safer bet.

### Conclusion

The LTT team offers nuanced views: Linux adoption is hindered by psychological barriers, console exclusives mostly harm gamers, 8GB VRAM is borderline, and used hardware is a calculated risk. The debate highlights the importance of context and personal needs in tech choices.

## Transcript

Every day, thousands of people argue
about computers online. Whether it's
hardware folk arguing over which GPU to
use or the gaming fans discussing why
Red Dead Redemption looks better than
Hello Kitty Island Adventure. But, what
do we, the writers of LTT, think about
these questions? Can we all agree which
phone is the best phone to ever phone?
Or, will we just yell again about how
ray tracing just isn't worth it? Let's
not mess around. We're going to start
with the first question. What is
stopping most people from switching to
Linux? My opinion on what's preventing
most people from switching is the fear
of doing something wrong. Maybe it's
picking the wrong distro or not knowing
the right question to ask in order to
set up gaming. I think there's kind of
just a general fear about touching it
that I think prevents most people from
switching.
>> I'm ready.
>> Wow, you guys all disagree with me.
Okay. You were the first one to hold up
a sign.
>> You're like kind of on track, but I
think it's like a decision paralysis.
>> Sure.
>> There's too many options. And so, yes,
exactly. I'm too afraid to do things,
but it's because there's too many.
Whereas, like an Apple,
I'm there's only one option. So, I just
pick one in an Apple. You pick it. Or,
you pick Windows and you're done.
Whereas, with Linux, all of a sudden
there's more things to dive into. I
don't want to have to pick which fork of
Linux that I'm using.
>> I mean, do you guys agree with that or
do you have a different
>> Yeah, I I've I've got a lot of the same
kind of sentiment, but a lot of it's
really coming down to people's comfort
levels. They're comfortable with what
they know and they're comfortable with
what they have. They don't want to
venture into the unknown and
find out that they may not like it
there.
>> At the end of the day, people are lazy.
>> Yeah, like it's just true. Like it's and
it's a lot of work to switch your stuff.
That's why people don't want to switch
phones.
>> Yeah, like how many people drive Android
for forever just because that's what
they bought first?
>> And how many people have been on an
iPhone cuz that's the first thing they
bought. People are just lazy and
switching anything is a lot of effort.
Even if it's easy, the idea of changing.
>> And I think it goes back to why I I it
up of like it's just the fear of it is
is ultimately what I think still stops
people and I think all of these kind of
gather under one roof almost of just
like it's the unknown that might make
people not switch. I spent
>> a long time trying to convince Shay to
switch to a bank so that we could get a
$500 cash promo.
And I was like, all you have to do
sorry, my phone is going off. Oh right,
I have a doctor's appointment.
>> Right now?
>> Yeah, I forgot about this shoot this
uh
>> [laughter]
>> How long is it? Quick.
>> Hello. All right, I just I'll be just a
second. Can I put you on hold?
>> Good. How are you?
>> I guess while Adam takes that phone
call, you guys can listen to this
message from our sponsor.
>> This wasn't the drip I had in mind.
If only he had a pair of Vessis.
It was supposed to be a quick job. Get
in, snag the new weekend sneaker, get
out.
All the rookie needed to do was go to
vessi.com/ltt,
but he didn't.
Then everything went sideways.
>> There you go. You can get it. I believe
in you.
>> There you go. Are console exclusive
games a good thing for gamers?
>> No.
Yeah.
>> Uh consumer choice is always going to be
a benefit being able to play more games
on the platforms that you already own
will in the long term benefit you.
I think that it's interesting to see the
flip recently from the communities about
asking for exclusives back because they
want to like justify the reason that
they bought
>> Yeah.
>> an Xbox or a PS5, right? But I think
that is just a reflection of the
predatory nature of exclusivity. It
invented a reason for you to have to buy
something. Whereas now, you don't have
to buy that thing, you have the choice
to buy the game on the platform that you
want. So that PS5 is no longer
valuable for its exclusivity. It's It's
just you They're just showing how the
tactic worked and now people are like
feeling bad because they spent a lot of
money on a PS5
and there's no reason that they couldn't
have [music] just kept with their Xbox
or whatever. I will say the only
positive that I think can come from
exclusive games is it could
theoretically drive competition in the
gaming space of like really trying to
make a really stand out title for that
console. But saying that, I think there
are way more cons to having exclusivity
than that
>> pro.
>> Yeah, I think it's only good for the
people making the hardware. [music]
>> Yeah.
>> And it also used to make a lot more
sense because before if you're making a
game for an N64 versus PS1, they're
completely different.
>> Yeah.
>> You have to develop it completely
differently. And so now everything's
basically a computer. And everything's
in the cloud anyway so you don't have to
worry about like oh CD versus cartridge.
>> Yeah.
>> So at this point, no. It doesn't even
help the game developer.
>> No. No. They're just locked into
something.
>> Yeah.
>> And you go like well Nintendo has like
all these cool like exclusive games. I
was like yeah.
>> And that's why you're buying a Switch.
>> why I bought a Switch too.
>> And now you have to buy a Switch to play
these cool games as opposed to being
able to play those games on their own
merit.
>> Also Nintendo uh
>> Oh, they're awful.
>> They're terrible so like yeah.
>> They're corporate tyrants. Like
[laughter]
they make great games and beloved
content and [music] they're terrible.
>> Corporations suck.
>> I would never be part of a corporation.
Wait.
>> Wait a minute. [laughter]
>> Is 8 gigs of VRAM enough today? I will
say yes depending on your resolution
that you're playing at.
>> I agree with you.
>> I disagree.
>> Oh, you do agree okay. I think at 1080p,
8 gigs is still totally fine. The
problem is 1440p is becoming a lot more
common these days. A lot of people are
gaming on their TVs in the living rooms.
That's 4K more than likely. Some people
have 4K monitors and and anything above
1080p, no. You need at least like 10 to
12 gigs of VRAM.
>> Yeah, I think it's enough like today but
I think it's It's of those things of
like if you buy an 8-gig card now,
you're going to be kind of screwing
yourself over for in 2 to 3 years. It's
kind of a difficult like future-proofing
for your gaming experience.
>> I was frustrated that there was only 8
gigs of VRAM on the 3070.
>> Yeah.
>> years ago. I happily bought the card. I
wanted the card to last 5 plus years.
I'm like 8 gigs is not going to be
enough in 5 years.
>> Yeah.
>> It's like something to really consider
if you're going to be currently
upgrading. If you currently have 8 gigs,
like I wouldn't worry about it.
>> Sure.
>> Yeah, that's a great way of wording
>> Ride it out, but if you're like
upgrading, consider it. But also with
things like upscalers continuing to
improve in terms of image quality,
requiring lower render resolution, it
might be able to extend
>> Yeah.
>> the lifespan of 8-gig cards.
>> DLSS, love it or hate it, has done
wonders for extending the lifespan of
cards.
>> Next one.
>> Oh, buying used hardware is an
unnecessary risk. You should just buy
new. I think there are some cases where
I would agree with that, but I think 90%
of the time buying a used PC hardware
thing, as long as you kind of know what
you're looking for, is there physical
damage, how long has it been in use for.
I think that I disagree with that
statement, and I think buying used is
totally acceptable. You just might need
to do a little bit more research on it.
>> I agree with your disagree.
>> Yeah, I'll better I'll better agree.
>> Yeah, there you go.
>> I'll better agree.
>> I disagree with his
>> Yeah.
>> disagree.
>> You go first.
>> Yeah.
>> Unnecessary risk. It is not needed,
especially with new hardware. Also, I
think that the used market, thanks to
the uh easy accessibility of market
places across the internet, the amount
of value on the used market for an
informed consumer has dramatically
worsened.
>> Dude, you used to be able to get any
electronic like 3 months later 50% off.
>> Yeah, because but now everybody now
everybody knows what they bought.
>> 80%.
>> what I have, right?
>> And so what you end up doing is you end
up buying something that doesn't have a
warranty,
um has a uh usage history that you don't
know, you can't return it easily.
>> Yep.
>> It is a legitimate risk, and it's hard
to find
>> [music]
>> those deals. And with prices feeling so
inflated all the time, right? Like there
you can get a used card that feels like
a good deal because that current card,
like the 40 your 4070, is selling at
$200 over MSRP.
>> Yeah.
>> So, when they're selling it at MSRP, a
year old, what a steal. It feels like a
good deal. And [laughter] but you're
just incurring you're just you are
incurring risk. Do I think it's
that big of a risk? As somebody who's
sold and also purchased a lot of
hardware, like used, I am yet to be
burned in a bad way from buying used
hardware.
>> Knock on wood for that one.
>> Like I got lots of used hard drives that
I'm sure are just waiting to die.
>> I would I was going to say hard drives
are one of the few things I wouldn't buy
used.
>> And that was what I brought up with like
depending on how long it's been used
for. And like there are things you can
check with hard drives, right? You can
check smart stats if the buyer will let
you.
>> doesn't tell you if it's been knocked
around, though. Like I killed three
drives in a row because Amazon couldn't
figure out how to ship a hard drive
properly.
>> Yeah. Yeah. That's
>> I just don't buy hard drives off Amazon
anymore.
>> Yeah. I mean, I buy like recertified
drives, and I know that there's a risk
with recertified drives where if the
controller was the bad part of it, yeah,
there's a fresh controller on it. You
don't know anything about the longevity
of the drives. But when you buy from
like a certified like reseller,
>> Server part deals, whatever.
>> they come with a warranty.
>> Yes.
>> And I've claimed the warranty.
>> Recertified's a bit of a different
category than used, though, too.
>> Yeah, I agree. I wouldn't call it like
used.
>> Used plus.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah, yeah, yeah. Exactly.
>> All righty. Question number six.
>> Mac devices are better for
professionals. This is a hard one. It
almost comes back to the whole
discussion about console exclusives.
What about the Mac exclusive software?
Really depends on what you're doing
because workload dependent, you may not
have a choice.
>> Mhm.
>> You may have to be using a Mac because
it's got the best software for what you
want to do. You may have to use a PC
with Windows because it's got the best
software that you can be using. That may
lock you out of Linux as an option as
well. I'm going to disagree with it.
>> Yeah, I guess I agree this looks awkward
cuz now we're thumbs up with you, but I
agree with David.
>> I agree so yeah, we're thumbs upping I'm
thumbs I agree with David.
>> That he disagrees.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah, okay.
>> [laughter]
>> Yeah, I think it basically you recapped
it pretty good. It's really hard to use
the blanket term professionals though.
Professional what? Like are you a
professional emailer? Because then no,
you don't need a MacBook. Are you a
professional Final Cut Pro editor? Then
yes, you probably need a MacBook.
There's infinite number of professions
out there. So having a blanket term like
that, no, I would not say Mac devices
are better.
>> I could be just be ignorant cuz I'm not
an Apple user, but how many softwares
are limited to [music] Apple that don't
have a Windows equivalent?
>> A lot of it's in the creative space.
>> Really?
>> Yeah.
>> But all of Adobe
>> Adobe is cross-platform on both, but I
mean if you grow up as a Final Cut
>> person because you bought your MacBook.
>> Yeah, but you can learn Premiere.
>> It's really easy to say that until
you've been someone who's growing up
with a software. It's a huge reason
Adobe has such a chokehold on the
industry because they got into schools
early and then people grow up with it.
>> It's less the big industry software and
more the like niche add-ons that
for specific workflows because
in the creative sphere there's a lot of
like just Mac users. So people will make
support it like things that support
workflows on Mac. Those things can also
be found on other operating systems.
>> Sure.
>> Yeah.
>> One thing I will say is that I have
noticed that there are cases where
software is better on the Mac version
than the Windows version. And I think in
those cases that's where it could be
better for professionals. Adobe Premiere
is a prime example of that. It
I was going to swear. It sucks on
Windows, especially AMD chips. I have
had way less issues with Premiere on
Mac.
>> Really?
>> Then yes. Saying that, it's Premiere so
it still kind of sucks.
>> [music]
>> But overall, that's a use case that I've
had a better experience with. I also
think that there is an aura that comes
from opening a MacBook as opposed to a
Windows laptop.
>> Oh, yeah.
>> When you're going at your business
meetings, right? I think that's like
literally a thing whether we like it or
not.
>> People made fun of me for the whole
social aspect of me buying an iPhone,
but like there is a social aspect to
getting work done on a Mac. Whether you
agree with it or not, people, it is a
thing.
>> You go into the boardroom and you open
up your Chromebook,
people are going to think about that.
>> [laughter]
>> It's not I'm not I'm not trying to like
Use your Chromebook if it's exactly what
you need. There's literally nothing
wrong with it. I'm just saying that that
people
humans are dumb and weird and our brains
make a million quick judgments in a snap
second.
>> That aura can go both ways with a
MacBook too.
>> Sure.
>> Yeah, that's true. That's true. You
>> Oh, you use a Mac.
>> in with like a MacBook, you walk in and
you're like, "Hello, starving artists."
And you walk in with like a MacBook Pro
and you're like, "Let's talk." And it's
like everyone's like
>> All right, Adam. Next one.
>> Are folding phones really worth the
extra price?
Nah, man. Like they suck. They're
They're bad. Oh, I'm sorry. They're not
bad. That's way too reductive. Folding
phones have such an intense [music]
price premium without providing
substantial
benefits to workflows unless you are
very specific people. It's a similar
question to being like, "Is an RTX
[music] Pro 6000 worth the price to jump
over a a 5090?" Unless you are a very
specific person, no.
And 99% of what you can get done on your
normal phone, you can get done on your
folding phone.
>> See, I was disagreeing when you said it
was not worth the extra price, but then
you like clarified with that and I'm
like, "Okay, I I get it."
>> Yeah.
>> I
loved when I had my Fold 4 when I did IT
work. It was so amazing for the
multitasking. I could have my password
manager on a little window, a Teams on
another little window in case I I
communicating with a co-worker or
something, and then Google on half the
screen for when I'm trying to Google
what the problem is. And having that
multitasking ability, phenomenal. And
it's something that I genuinely miss
with my iPhone. So, Apple, please make a
folding phone. I think that they are
worth it with the extra price. Again, if
you're someone who uses it. But,
>> flip phones
>> Oh,
>> No. Flip phones
>> No.
>> are just never worth it. They're just
They're just cool.
>> They've come down a lot, and they're
getting closer to the price of like
flagship phones, but I still think that
it's not worth it. You should just get a
flagship phone.
>> I don't even think flagship phones are
worth it.
>> I agree with that, too.
>> Get like a A-series Samsung or a
A-series Pixel or E-series iPhone. I
don't care what you use. I think almost
everyone does not need a flagship phone.
>> of people are overpaying for their
>> Almost everyone.
>> [clears throat]
>> I completely agree with you.
>> the And then to get a folding phone,
it's literally like double the price.
You go from like $1,000 to like $2,000.
Where you're getting twice You're
getting twice
>> Yeah, I'm not getting twice the phone.
I'm getting twice the screen and four
times as fragile.
>> Oh my god, that breaks over time.
>> more likely to overheat cuz it's so
thin.
>> Yeah.
>> But listen, guys. It's really good.
>> For like one thing that I have to do
sometimes.
>> Next question.
>> In your opinion, what was the best phone
ever made? I'm probably the worst person
for this question cuz I don't really
care about phones. But, I believe it
would be the Nokia what, the 8210 or
something like that? The indestructible
one.
>> That's crazy.
>> the best phone ever made. It will never
die. It is indestructible, and we peaked
when that was when that was produced.
>> Hell no. I mean, you
>> Yeah, of course. I'm well aware that
this is a bad opinion. I don't care. I I
don't care about phones, and I think
that almost every advancement we've made
has just been icing on a cake at this
point.
>> my favorite phone was my Note 4 just
because it was one of the biggest phones
I ever had at the time. Still
>> what's the best phone?
>> Uh
>> That's the problem. It's the best It's
not my favorite. It's what the what's
the best phone. So, even like my answer
was more my favorite phone.
>> I really think that the kind of
culmination of features with the Galaxy
S5 was
>> Okay.
>> really good.
>> Yeah.
>> Because it was the last one you still
had a user replaceable battery with. It
had the gasket around the outside, too,
so it was still waterproof as well,
which was not common at that point in
time.
>> Don't you miss dropping your phone and
it blowing up?
>> I mean, [laughter]
that was a feature. That was
>> No, it was. Like, it literally was
better than it like cracking and
breaking the frame.
>> And it had Gorilla Glass at that point
in time. It was really scratch
resistant. It had really good hardware
for the time. I think it was a really
good package.
>> Yeah. Remember how fragile iPhones were
when they came out? Yeah. Like, everyone
loves to laud the iPhone, but like, you
could drop it from like a centimeter and
the whole screen is just gone. Like, it
was so bad.
>> Greatest uh
non-smartphone of all time? Sure. The
second-gen Motorola RAZR.
>> Oh, peak.
>> Yeah.
>> That's a great phone.
>> That's incredible. It was It was
beautiful phone.
>> Oh, so good. Never believe.
>> Gorgeous
>> screen. Or if you want to go best
feature phone,
you got to go with the Sidekick.
Uh incredible texting, incredible key
>> Oh, sure. You flip it side Yeah.
>> If you want to go best smartphone, uh
obviously iPhone 4.
>> I was going to iPhone 4.
>> iPhone 4 was going to be my backup.
>> iPhone 5. I think iPhone 5, personally,
cuz it's just the iPhone 4, but taller.
>> [laughter]
>> I think that you got to shout out the LG
G2,
which was the one where you could pull
out the battery. It had replaceable
modules at the
>> bottom.
>> That was sick as hell. Or the HTC One
M8. All metal, stainless steel
construction. Uh dual stereo speakers.
Uh a vibration motor that could give
someone a heart attack. It was in It was
louder than It was my alarm. I just put
it on my nightstand table and the
vibration was like
>> Comment down below which your favorite
phone was that either you had or wish
you had growing up. All right, next
question. What is better, IEMs or
over-the-ear headphones? I would pick
over-the-ear headphones, I think every
time.
>> Yeah.
>> I also would pick over-the-ear
headphones every time.
>> Okay, so no one disagrees.
>> But I'm going to make a big a big fight
for IEM's.
>> IEM's, you can get the same sound
quality for like
like not even like like like a like a an
eighth of the price. You can get like
$80 IEM's, they're going to last
forever. They're super lightweight,
they're super compact, easier for
travel. They also have a natural form of
noise isolation cuz they literally plug
your ears. It's way easier for mobility
if you're doing stuff like I don't know,
like recording music. If you're a
musician and you need to monitor your
mix or whatever, you're going to put
IEM's on. They are less garish than
headphones that are going over your
ears, they're less bulky. They're
they're harder to steal. If you have a
$1,000 pair of IEM's, no one notices. If
you have AirPods Max, everyone notices.
That's fair.
>> Right?
>> Yeah. I like headphones for anything
that's not mobile. And then if it is
mobile, if I got to go to the gym, I'm
going to go for a walk or something,
then at that point, sure, I'll use
AirPods.
>> your desk, you'll use overhead.
>> any other instance, even if I'm walking
around at home, I'd rather then have
wireless
um just headphones.
>> There's a reason why they both exist.
On-ear headphones,
you can [ __ ] die.
>> [laughter]
>> Is it me? I'm next?
>> I think you're next.
>> Okay. What should I invest more money
in? A keyboard or a mouse? I know my
answer. I know my answer right away. I'm
I'm going to go with keyboard. I think
naturally people are going to spend more
money on their keyboard
because that's the part that you're
going to be interacting with more, at
least for a typical user. Yeah, if
you're playing games or whatever, you're
going to be using your mouse a whole
bunch, but maybe you're using a
controller, maybe you're using your
mouse with your keyboard. Uh but the
keyboard's almost always involved, and
[music] I think that's
that's where I would spend my money.
>> I think you can get a long way with like
a $60 mouse, and I think most people are
100% okay with a $60 mouse. And you can
say the same thing about a keyboard.
However, if I can get a mechanical hot
swap keyboard, I can fix that, and I can
repair it, and I can have that keyboard
for the rest of my life. Whereas, like,
yeah, you can change the switches on a
mouse, and but it's annoying. The laser
gets gunked up after like a long time,
and you can clean that, too, but uh I
100% would spend more on a But, I also
think that you should spend similar
amounts on them.
>> I agree with that.
>> I don't think you should spend $500 on a
keyboard. I don't think you should spend
$500 on a mouse, either.
>> I think if I was looking at like the
comparison between a higher-tier
keyboard and a higher-tier mouse, I
would personally go with a higher-tier
mouse. And I think that's because I can
get by with the free Logitech keyboard
that you get for gaming and like a
little bit of casual typing. Whereas,
those free mice suck. If I'm comparing
kind of the value level of each. And so,
I would rather pick up G502, G305 as a
mouse, and still get by with those cheap
Logitech keyboards, for example. Saying
that, when you have a nice keyboard,
it is nice. And I will never deny it's a
good typing experience. It's good for
repairability.
>> Can be good for repairability.
>> Can be. Sure. You can buy a $300
keyboard that's basically a throwaway.
>> Yeah, 100%. Some of the things go wrong.
>> Uh I agree. Keyboard better.
>> Okay. [laughter]
>> All right. Sure. Next question.
>> Keyboard and mouse is always better than
a controller for PC gaming.
>> Mm.
>> Always.
>> Yeah, that's a big keyword in that.
>> Like, obviously not. Obviously not
always.
>> Yeah. I don't want to play a racing game
with a
>> I've been playing a [clears throat] lot
of Forza Horizon 6, and I I guarantee
you I'm not using the keyboard.
>> [laughter]
>> I think there is definitely some people
online that will always argue keyboard
and mouse, cuz I was playing 007
recently, and there was quite a few
people that are like, "Why you playing
with a controller?" And I was like, "I
don't know. The combat just feels
smoother when I play with a controller,
for me personally.
But, I also understand, I guess, why
some people are like, "Oh, no. Aiming is
so much better, so you got to just use a
mouse if there's anything that involves
aiming." I don't know, man. I
don't think it's always better.
>> There's also a bunch of aim assist on
controllers that makes it just feel
totally fine. 007's actually pretty
aggressive for you.
>> the gyro aiming. Like gyro aiming really
nice for
>> You know, it's not for me, David, but I
fully encourage anyone who likes it to
use the gyro.
>> It is a middle ground between the analog
stick and the mouse, and I played the
entirety of Last of Us Two with gyro
aiming. Phenomenal experience.
>> Like snap to where you need to be and
then like dial it in. It's like it can
be really good. I got pretty good at it
with Splatoon.
>> Oh, dude, it's competitive all
competitive Splatooners, dude, they're
>> [laughter]
>> I think that like obviously the keyboard
and mouse enable certain types of games
to exist in a way that they just don't
exist on controller.
>> A lot of games don't even have keyboard
and mouse support.
>> Yeah.
>> They straight up tell you at the start
when you launch the game, "Hey, this
requires a controller." Or
>> Like Skate is like a prime example. It's
like, "Please use a controller."
>> You you literally need it for like
>> But that's also like not just a PC game.
>> True.
>> Right? Like I think that like for a lot
of like specific PC games you get like
stuff like they're certain RTS game.
>> That's right. It does specify PC gaming.
>> PC gaming, but that's why always but PC
games don't just play games that are
only on PC.
>> But
>> I think that there's a lot of cool games
that don't translate to um controller.
Like I could not imagine trying to play
Deadlock.
>> Oh god.
>> Most MMOs as well. Like
>> Oh, yeah, too many.
>> You can do things with controllers, and
I know that there are programs that
people use to be able to remap buttons
to controllers and play MMOs like World
of Warcraft. But it's
>> [laughter]
>> it's just so much harder, in my opinion.
>> got three hotkey bars all filled up
dude, I've seen the UIs that people
>> have.
>> The thought of playing like World of
Warcraft or something on a controller is
just like breaking my brain.
>> Some of these questions might have gone
too long for the YouTube video, so make
sure you guys head over to
lmg.gg/floatplane to check out the
extras. We might have even cut some
questions from the YouTube version. But
if you're here on YouTube, you should at
least stay for a little bit longer to
listen to this message from our sponsor.
>> The coveted Vessi weekend sneaker.
I never thought I'd see the day. We need
to be careful, rookie.
One false move and
I don't understand. Why does it have to
be this shoe?
>> You're never going to make it in the spy
world without a proper pair of Vessis.
Word is that Vessis are 100% waterproof,
but it's more than that. These shoes
were built for summer. They're
lightweight, breathable, perfect for a
beach stroll or a trip to the city. But
even if there's a surprise rain, you're
still one dry spy.
>> With a 30-day return policy and 1-YEAR
WARRANTY? NO WAY!
OH NO!
>> [screaming]
>> YEAH, YOU WEREN'T READY, KID. YOU needed
protection. NOW YOU'LL NEVER KNOW HOW
EASY IT is to pair the Vessi weekend
sneaker with any OF YOUR SUMMER OUTFITS.
>> I'm so sorry. This would have never
happened if I just went to vessi.com/ltt
and saved 15% off on my own pair.
Tell my WIFE
DAMN YOU, WATER! [screaming]
>> I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU GUYS. Do you
think that there's somebody watching
should comment, like, and subscribe?
>> Yeah.
>> [laughter]
>> Yeah.
So, if you guys enjoyed this video, make
sure you comment, like, and subscribe.
And if you really enjoyed this format,
go back and check out the first time we
did it a couple months ago. We had some
slightly different questions, and there
was a much more heated, passionate
argument from Adam.
>> [laughter]