---
title: 'Трейдинг обучение | Как научиться торговать'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=KnSag1swono'
video_id: 'KnSag1swono'
date: 2026-07-25
duration_sec: 2509
---

# Трейдинг обучение | Как научиться торговать

> Source: [Трейдинг обучение | Как научиться торговать](https://youtube.com/watch?v=KnSag1swono)

## Summary

This video addresses the common pitfalls beginners face in trading, emphasizing that 80% of failures stem from two key issues: lack of context analysis and insufficient practical experience. The instructor introduces the concept of a 'k-test' (backtesting on historical data) as an accelerated learning method and demonstrates a live chart analysis session with students, focusing on Bitcoin. The goal is to teach traders how to correctly interpret market context using higher timeframes, liquidity sweeps, and order blocks.

### Key Points

- **Two main reasons beginners fail** [00:02] — 80% of beginners fail because they do not know how to analyze context or they lack practical experience in analyzing context.
- **Three steps to learn trading** [00:50] — First, study a trading concept. Second, learn to correctly analyze the context. Third, spend maximum time on practical application via k-tests.
- **What is a k-test?** [02:30] — A k-test is practicing with historical chart sections to simulate trading opportunities, allowing accelerated acquisition of practical insight.
- **Definition of context analysis** [04:38] — Context analysis is understanding the cause and effect of why the price performed a certain sequence of actions, answering where price came from, what manipulations occurred, and where it is likely to go next.
- **Liquidity sweep explained** [06:10] — A liquidity sweep (or removal of liquidity) is manipulation of highs and lows to trigger stop losses, often seen in sideways movements.
- **Order block identification** [12:51] — An order block is a specific candle formation that can act as support or resistance; on the hourly chart, it may appear as a two-candle formation.
- **Breaker block formation** [22:02] — A breaker block forms after a structure breakdown, often used as an entry signal for short positions when combined with liquidity pools.
- **Entry on breaker with risk-reward** [24:13] — After manipulation, traders can enter short from a breaker zone, setting stop above manipulation, aiming for a risk-reward ratio of at least 1:2.69.
- **Priority of higher timeframe liquidity** [30:47] — Liquidity pools from higher timeframes (daily, four-hour) outweigh smaller imbalances, making them the primary target for price movements.
- **Key decision trigger: structure breakdown** [33:08] — A breakdown of internal structure (e.g., formation of a breaker) is a critical confirmation for entering a trade, as it indicates a change in price behavior.

### Conclusion

Mastering trading requires relentless practice in context analysis through methods like k-tests, which compress months of real-time experience into a manageable timeframe. Success hinges on understanding liquidity dynamics on multiple timeframes and waiting for structural confirmations before entering trades.

## Transcript

trade is a very painful question for beginners. Haven't you already studied a bunch of theories and concepts and the result? No, this is a typical typical story. In 80% of cases, the reason is the same for everyone,
story. In 80% of cases, the reason is the same for everyone, or rather, there are two: firstly, you do not know how to correctly analyze the context or do not even know what it is, and secondly, you have little practical experience in analyzing this very
context, and without understanding the context, any patterns, order blocks, imbalances will not help you make money in the market. I remind you of the main rule in trading. Everything depends on the context, so how do you learn to
the context, so how do you learn to trade? First, study the trading concept. Second, learn how to correctly analyze the analyze the context. Third, and most importantly, spend the
context. Third, and most importantly, spend the maximum amount of time on the
conduct a k-test on any asset. The k-test is indispensable in learning to trade because it allows you to quickly work through many trading situations. When you trade in real time, you simply do not have such an accelerated opportunity,
which means that when you are in a real transaction, you can get the result after a certain amount of time, sometimes it is several hours, and sometimes several days or even weeks. The question is how long  You will
check the correctness of your trading in this mode. How long will it this mode. How long will it take? The answer is a long, very long time. Many of you will simply give up and leave trading forever, and all because a lot of time passes from the
moment you enter a trade to receiving a result. In addition, you simply miss many trading situations because you simply were not behind the chart at the right time.
learning process and minimize the time from entering a trade to receiving entering a trade to receiving feedback? How can you learn to trade in an accelerated mode? feedback? How can you learn to trade in an accelerated mode? The answer is to conduct tests. The more the
better, to get the first stable results, it is recommended to stable results, it is recommended to conduct them for
get similar practical experience in real time, you will need months. And for some, even a year will not be enough. Most beginners are not ready for such a Most beginners are not ready for such a marathon, so the test is an excellent
way to significantly speed up your learning process. In this video, I will show a small part of the online conference that I held for my students. Such QSTs are held regularly as part of the training in each stream. The goal of the
QST is to consolidate the acquired knowledge and, most importantly, to teach students to correctly analyze the context, because knowledge divorced from the context will not help you divorced from the context will not help you earn money. If  If you don't understand the context,
your trades are doomed to failure right away. Let me clarify: a test is a practice of using the away. Let me clarify: a test is a practice of using the history of a section of the chart that has already formed with the goal of using the history to practice the trading opportunities that
were provided. In other words, a test is an accelerated acquisition of practical insight in order to then apply the acquired knowledge in real
acquired knowledge in real trading. Once again, a test is not real transactions, it is working with history. But this is the most important and necessary stage in your development as a trader. And for those of you who think that everything is
simple and clear in history and that supposedly anyone can handle it, I have one simple piece of advice. Take it yourself in the market simulator mode. Rewind the chart at least a week ago, or better yet, a month, then switch to a lower timeframe and
try to do such a k-test yourself, and then write in the comments whether this was the case or not. How many profitable trades you had. And how many profitable trades you had. And how many unprofitable ones. But let's return to the context. So, in
short, contextual analysis in trading is an understanding of the causes and effects of why the price performed a certain sequence of actions. That is, the trader must first answer the questions: Where did we
come from to this point?  What manipulations were performed during the movements and where the price is most likely to rush next, the analysis of the context begins with higher time frames and we usually look for entry points on
lower ones. Now let's look at the excerpt from the KTE that I conducted for students and it will become clearer to you how this looks in practice. I recommend watching it to the end because along the way, students will ask interesting questions to which I will
give answers. I think it will be useful for all beginners to listen and many points will become clearer for you. So, let 's look, rewind 2 weeks ago and
start with Bitcoin, what we have at the moment. And at this point, we see that the price has rested right in our zone of interest of the higher time frame. I did not specifically turn off the indicator, I think it will be useful with it. And right in the zone of interest of the
daily balance of the higher time frame, we also have a liquidity sweep. Again, I have said many times for those who may be hearing this term for the first time. Well, may be hearing this term for the first time. Well, the removal of liquidity is the same thing, that
is, we have manipulation of highs highs and potentially sawing a sideways movement. And here there is a High update, here an update of the Low has not happened yet. And this
update of the Low has not happened yet. And this We have formed a drawdown just like that, We have formed a drawdown just like that, and in the 0.5 day range, a new imbalance. I am inclined to mark it as an unfiled liquidity pool close to Well, one of the
closest ones. Yes, we will mark it that way from above, there was work with liquidity, plus, I repeat, this all happened in the zone of a higher time frame, the zone of interest that we still have on the daily chart, which can be immediately
have on the daily chart, which can be immediately noted, and the ascending structure, in principle, here we do
but that is not the point. In general, the trend was ascending, but we have just reached the zone of interest of the higher time frame, so it is appropriate to expect that either a sideways movement has been correction. Moreover, from below we have already covered a fairly large distance, and
if here it was stopped, everyone was moving up and down, then here we flew by. Day after up and down, then here we flew by. Day after day, an upward movement, leaving behind us, especially a fairly large zone of imbalance here, and even smaller ones here.
Perhaps this imbalance, most likely, if the price starts to correct lower, it will not hold the price because there was a reaction in it at 0.5 and this is just now at 0.5 and this is just now
This daily timeframe would be worth noting in principle if the correction
the indicator, but I've marked it on the higher timeframes so that it remains as an area of ​​the daily timeframe. Well, that's all I would highlight on the daily timeframe. I would n't highlight anything significant. This is all
that interests us for now. looking at, is the four-hour one. We'll fix it now. In principle, you can
delete the liquidity update. We'll just leave it for the sake of and what was basically visible on the daily chart here at four hours and even
more clearly is a potential sideways movement. Upper boundary. Lower boundary. You have n't passed the sideways movement yet. But have you really looked at this lesson? You understand that there's quite a lot going on here. We also see that on the four-
hour [music] there's a on the daily chart we essentially formed this formation of ours. Stop
in the zone of interest.  daily balance, that is, I am more inclined in this case to continue some kind of short, I don’t know how long it will be. In this case, it’s difficult to say, but the immediate targets are
our liquidity shelf from below, that is, the Lower Limit of the range for potential deviation and an imbalance that has not yet been tested on a four-hour timeframe. In principle, let’s also
also mark the balance, the four-hour one, tested. Here is the purple area that I marked earlier in it. We see
that this purple area is what I noted on the daily chart, a large imbalance that was not tested. And on the four-hour one, it
here, hourly ones. But this is quite far away. Therefore, for now, it is worth considering how the price will develop here further, well, essentially on the four-hour one, and I would this, I think it is enough, let’s
enough, let’s look at the hourly one. What’s happening here and before we continue, I have important news for you. In addition to this YouTube channel, I also run a full-fledged educational project on
smartmoney trading. So just subscribe  to my free Telegram channel and follow the announcements. Periodically, I will publish unique content and special offers for you there. I emphasize that they are available only to
subscribers of my Telegram channel. Join our community and we will trade together. The link to my Telegram channel is in the description under this Telegram channel is in the description under this video. Here are even more guys. Can you hear everything
fine? It's such a silence. Maybe there are questions. Yes, I can hear perfectly. There are questions, but then probably yes, okay. Well, yes, if anything arises, then ask what's here again on the hourly rate, and by the way, immediately on the Nevada four-hour timeframe. We
always look at it when analyzing a coin, but this is an analysis to understand the general direction of the price. But the 3-day hourly rate for our trading is the most effective timeframe on which we look at our nearest zones of interest and
liquidity shelves. And then, on the 15-minute or 15-minute chart, we select entry points. This is a combination. It is one of the optimal ones, and we went through this at the sweat conference. There is an went through this at the sweat conference. There is an even clearer sideways trend here. It is
worth noting that the deviation here can be marked differently. In can be marked differently. In principle, on the hourly rate, it looks like this: two candles and  I removed liquidity specifically from this High, but I would have taken it away, I
apologize, because all these this one, along with this Yoko, I also removed this candle already. That is, I
would highlight the order block like this, and in connection with this, what we observe next in this part of the chart is that the price did not go higher, it was again
held back, returned back to the NJ range. Well, let's temporarily extend this Well, let's temporarily extend this border, the upper border of the NJ, that is, I am inclined to consider the deviation from below, we have a
Loy hourly imbalance, the closest one right behind it, this imbalance
NJ, and these and these things are also always noticed. Well, I marked them like this, it will look more beautiful if you draw a straight line, yes, that
if you draw a straight line, yes, that is, equal Loys, right here, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 hourly candles, it is clearly visible that they hit this area, here they specifically this area, here they specifically held back the withdrawals of the internal and led the
held back the withdrawals of the internal and led the asset valuation upward, and such things are always noticed immediately, well, and also this Loy, along with this, these are essentially our cascades that interest us as Here are the targets, and behind them is the hourly imbalance,
then another four-hour one. We responded to it, marked it with a purple rectangle from the four-hour one. But the closest one on the hourly timeframe is literally right
behind our cascades. I'm just noting it so that you learn to analyze and how to look at the chart correctly. Let me
chart correctly. Let me draw it differently here, so that which is now giving a reaction, which is highlighted by the yellow
rectangle, will give a reaction, and we will not update its top. But we will go and remove the lower border of the sideways movement and
these cascades below it. Well, most likely, everything will not stop there. At least the closest hourly balance for them may be lower. It is also worth paying attention to how the price moves in this range of the order
block that I marked. We see that there is an imbalance here and it was tested completely. Phil, he essentially held the price. After which we updated this structural Loy, that is, the price was brought lower to a new level,
lower to a new level, then here again. Well, if now we look at a lower timeframe, but even here you can see  With the naked eye can see  With the naked eye And what was inside this swing, there was also
work with liquidity, this is essentially our hourly orlock, which removed these equal candles of neighboring hours. Yes, this is a small removal of liquidity, but analyze when we are at some point. Well, in the test mode, we have
now stopped here and are looking at what was before this, how the price approached this zone of interest, how it developed, did it remove the sense for it to return higher?
According to the analysis, the imbalance was filled, liquidity was cleared here in was filled, liquidity was cleared here in each of these wave yes price movements. And the final thing that is noteworthy is that I like such stories, similar example
was in the lesson, there was, I think, on the coin. When you see such constantly dragged, captured liquidity, gave a squeeze down, but do not break through the lays that are here on trades, essentially equal and such short ones. Locks that, in essence,
You see this final order block on which we now stopped. And on rewind, that is, growing  An engulfing candle and again. We didn't go higher, we cleared the liquidity here, and I'm still inclined to
assume that right now, since this has already happened, there's a final liquidity capture again in the cut, and we have equal lays here, enter like this here, but most likely we'll go to the nearest liquidity here again, if we return, then
later. Maybe after a deviation from below, this shelf of cascades that are formed here will also become liquidity. But now I'm still inclined to believe that we have equal lays here, their balances behind them. There's still a lot of liquidity here.
lays here, their balances behind them. There's still a lot of liquidity here. inclined that the price will go exactly to make a deviation from below after we had a deviation from above. This is on the hourly timeframe, in principle, there's probably
timeframe, in principle, there's probably nothing to add here, but after that, we switch to... When you've analyzed this in approximately this way, the chart timeframes, where you're looking for some options to open a
position, if there are any at all, we look at what's happening on the fifteen- minute chart here.  It's all a little more beautiful to see here.  It's all a little more beautiful to see how the price worked with
block that removed these equal HIs, then here. This order block, which is on the hour, like a two-candle formation, here, as it is not a classic one, worked with liquidity here, what I'm mean is also more beautifully visible, they accumulated liquidity and
took it out right away. Yes, with local breakouts. Yes, from a breaker, and so on. There was a series of such movements, that is, the price is pressed to the lower shelf, here they is, the price is pressed to the lower shelf, here they specially insert these
equal cascades. This is what we noted on the four hours below, and after this final capture of liquidity here, when we again gave the price here to
this low but did not break it right away, such lais are usually specially inserted plus this one and plus everything that we have noted on the left side. noted on the left side. Here. And here you can look for a position. Can I
ask a question along the way? Look, we are now in exactly this period of time, and when you say that this High is the final one. We do
n't know yet, yes. That is, you are on I didn't say that it is directly the final one. I said that on  Based on what I just analyzed on my timeframe, this is the final removal here, this is the final one, yes, before updating this structure with
the formation of a breaker here. That is, you meant the final one in the picture, but it does not mean that the final one is in this structure. Yes, I wanted to clarify the word final itself, it means that
in this picture, the final one means everything, everything, not. Can you understand that the final one is that we have already removed it and are going down, that is, we are looking for, for example, an entry point for a piece, that is,
on fifteen minutes, what I still see here, I see a local one, in fact, here is a sideways movement now I am deleting unnecessary things already. I think you have already seen
what I wanted to convey to you regarding working with liquidity. Also, pay attention to how the price approached the shelves that have already been pressed tightly. Yes, let me mark them here too, in fact, they traded with this
look from the High itself, there was Well, remember. Yes, everything on the higher timeframe Well, remember. Yes, everything on the higher timeframe was p, a powerful small VKD daily High  The imbalance has been tested once, here the imbalance is immediately tested, the test has
imbalance is immediately tested, the test has been tested, the imbalance that I showed was completely full, Lily was cut, and the price was held, the
structural low was updated. Yes, here on the inside, but it doesn't matter. The new imbalance also involved manipulation of the highs, which is what I just noted. And these
yoki that are still here were removed, this final one stabbed with a candle shadow, a sharp vka. Tom, well, this is the order block that I just showed you on the hour, here, at fifteen minutes. After that, we see that we had
an update at this point of this structural element with the formation of a breaker element with the formation of a breaker block, in essence. And in this, at this point in this range, I would probably highlight this entire
range, I would probably highlight this entire final one before these highs, the low, that is, I would look for my position in it like this.
thoughts for now, so far it all looks like RTO, I explained why after this breakdown, I'm still considering it. I don't think that after this work of liquidity, filling all the inv, now it's still like this, bringing it up
higher, of course, this can happen, but here everyone  You are taking the risk. I believe that testing this large order block was already quite large order block was already quite sufficient, and I would be looking for a short point for the
target that we marked from higher timeframes. If you like this kind of k-test and want to see a new video with a continuation, where not only profitable but also unprofitable trades will be shown, then
write about it in the comments. If there are a lot of comments, there will soon be a continuation of how one could enter a position here. That is, one could try to wait for the price of this imbalance,
but we see that it has already been tested. We noticed that it was tested before we gave this local elephant here. It often happens that the price immediately after this, when a local break occurs here
immediately rushes down without giving a test, it often happens. Therefore, set your entry point as close as possible, let's say, as close as you can, to stretch your risk- reward ratio. That is, we have a
fifteen-ton breaker here. Here it is, I marked it, now we will highlight it as now we will highlight it as breaks with such a blue rectangle. I would initially set the
instrument short  The position is thus, that is, to enter from this manipulation zone because this whole movement was manipulative and we see that the price was held back again before this Loya, that is, most likely,
held back again before this Loya, that is, most likely, now there will be a move here, so you can put them with the balance that is inside here. But I am confused that it has already been tested, right at the very beginning, but
nevertheless. They may give or they may not give, as I said, after such said, after such manipulations before some movement with the mouth that is often outlined, the price is no longer extremely interesting and immediately
rushes down or up depending on that or that's why try first to put on the nearest zones of interest, this is our breaker here and see if your risk-reward ratio comes out, that is, we put a stop for
this manipulation. That's where I have already marked, well, I will not be there now again switch to an hour and so everything is visible here, we look, our ratio of rice and profit turned out to be
cash at the lower border of this sideways movement of 2.69, the minimum does not fit under our ratio, you can play here further, move up, move the entry point. Will they give  Will they
give a test? Well, the question is, because everything could spill out right away if you didn't have time to enter the market, then they might not give you a second chance. This is the story that's going on, that's what we noted next. There was an hourly imbalance behind this lo.
Well, on the 15th minute, it's also there. Let's see how much before it, here it turns out to be 339. In principle, a normal ratio of
339. In principle, a normal ratio of 2.74 for Bitcoin is not exactly low, but this is its normal working process. 3 days, I repeat, this is only from the GO. Here they worked with liquidity within this upper and lower, that is, the boundaries of this
large order block. They cleared all their balances after themselves. This kind of entry is basically quite aggressive, but I use it, that is, someone asked how. Show similar examples. By the way, they were also shown in the lessons. That is, here will be
some of my real trades that were on Bitcoin, therefore  I'm showing you how I were on Bitcoin, therefore  I'm showing you how I thought. Here's my question. Now thought. Here's my question. Now I'll tell you in a second. The
our senior timeframe, four-hour, with
great skill and betting more ambitiously, for example, on this Ilan. But near future immediately after this border is spiked. Here are 339 of ours, already well. Yes.
Question. Yes, I'm sorry for interrupting. I thought you had finished speaking. Look, you know, in the World Cup. That's why
Why do we think that because I marked our priorities for you from senior timeframes? I'll marked our priorities for you from senior timeframes? I'll come back again here, you'll see again. Yes, I'm showing you.
see again. Yes, I'm showing you. Because in front of our balances, there is a shelf of equal catches. Here is a shelf of equal catches. Well, I marked them here, like this, yeah, essentially, that's all. Our cascades, which, together with the lower boundary of the range, here is the Upper
boundary. The Lower one forms a powerful liquidity floor, so I don't expect this imbalance to globally restrain the price. It can give a short-term reaction. Here, too, the price will be returned back to this order block. You see, on the hour, this is the
order block.  It is visible as a classic two- candle formation. That is, it can give a reaction, they can then return here from it, but globally directly to reversals on the transition. We are unlikely to go, most likely it will continue because one
go, most likely it will continue because one here they cleared up the liquidity imbalance, so I expect the price to this imbalance, it turns out that a large amount of liquidity will be a priority
than a large amount of liquidity from higher time frames. Yes, of course, it will be a priority than the balance of 15 minutes that are nearby, we have everything understood, thank you very much, please, so let's go back for a minute. So we move on.
question about filling the balances above with it. Well, it would seem, on the one hand, it is clear that if they are not completely filled, the Price can return to them.
And this is a negative factor for us, they are not 50% filled. I believe that such balances have an increased risk of repeated returns. But these are statistical
observations. Yes, I understand this consideration, but there is such a question that, on the other hand, if the imbalance is not completely filled, then this is some evidence of the strength of the downward movement, and in that regard  Or in this case, since it's a
sideways movement, then this order is down - this consideration is inapplicable precisely because we are in a sideways movement. Order Flow down is here, but it's not exactly like that. There is an obvious trend here, it's more of a sideways movement, too. This is
if you look at it visually, it's also similar to a sideways movement, but from above again. We have already cleared the imbalance and liquidity behind us, that is, at the moment, right now, before the price hit this low and did not
break through it. I don't think that now there will be a move up again, again, to take away the which has also already been tested, for example, or there is infantry to do this, maybe, but
I am ready to accept this risk because the liquidity pool of the higher timeframes is in my favor from below, and the fact that we came from here from the zone of interest of the higher timeframe, we give a reaction to the daily balance, and inside this large order
balance, and inside this large order block, a four-hour one. We clear fill the balance with it, that is, all these arguments outweigh everything for me, and I am
leaning towards Paul in favor of a short.  Yes, there is partly a risk because at the top there is partly a risk because at the top we have Hi 2 ha IT. They all seem to form cascades in essence, but based on the logic that I just
spoke about the sequence. I am still inclined that there will be a short here. And when I see such real situations on the chart, I cannot say that I always make decisions to open, let's say, medium-risk trades, but
I do it from time to time in the lessons. I even showed such examples in the lessons. I mean, according to the course, that's why this is another such situation. I am why this is another such situation. I am simply explaining how I would think, I understood.
Save, Evgeny, hello. And we are not confused by this liquidity at the top, trending, yes. Because they filled out small balances correctly. I have just
continue the short because this final manipulation has a breakdown of the internal structure. If it were not here, here, structure. If it were not here, here, because of this, Ilan, it was too early
to enter, let's say, because until this movement in the RI of fifteen minutes four has not happened, it has not broken here yet. Internal structure We didn't have our StopHam Yes, it was fully formed as a theme, reversal patterns,
here's our classic phat, right here. That is, you can even see how here, essentially, there's a sideways movement within the sideways movement. But if you look here again, yes, we
also have essentially a range, it's so unsightly, but nevertheless. Yes, we're filling up here, in short, the key moment is a breakdown of the structure, this is what I understood, yes. The key when making a decision is the formation of a breaker. Well, let's remember our Stop pattern.
formation of a breaker. Well, let's remember our Stop pattern. there, one by one, yes, yeah. Yes, there is liquidity from below, a breakdown of the structure occurs, an internal swing of the structure, it doesn't matter. Here we have a change in the nature of the
price movement. Yes, we have happened and we conclude that when this movement of three candles in four begins, well, you see. Yes, I'm showing it, it went, it stopped before this lo, it didn't remove it, then most likely we will now go a
second wave to continue updating these pools, because this was a manipulation in order to pick up passengers here. For further powerful short. Well, powerful within a higher timeframe. I mean, I
understood everything.  Yeah, that's about the logic. Yes, from this, their balance is a minute. Who has experience can take risks? I sometimes do this, but this is more you know, such intuitive training, until a break has occurred here, here, and our order block has
not been confirmed. RBC of a higher timeframe. This is still dangerous because from here, without updating this Loy, we could have done a re-run like this and taken it all away, but additional basis and from this
breaker that formed here, you can enter, that's great. Thank you very much. There are also often here. After such an impulse movement, in a word, structures are also small for them, balances on lower timeframes. You can enter from them too.
Let's also look at the five-minute chart, by the way, just in case. Although it will be difficult for beginners to sometimes look at five-minute charts but nevertheless, we see that here too. We had an
imbalance, and in principle, if you followed this situation on five-minute charts, you could try to enter from this imbalance. Well, here it is, about this imbalance. Well, here it is, about
again, if the risk-reward ratio allows. Well, here, in principle, what. So, it would be the same, but I do n't  It's not that I don't recommend it, I'll show today a five-minute analysis and how to enter
five-minute analysis and how to enter several interesting situations. But in most cases, 15 minutes will be enough while you're just starting to learn. If it's already here from the nearest zone of
interest. Yes, there, from this breaker, you have one to TM and with Maxi. Well, with a manipulation. This is all a manipulative movement. Take it, put it here, maybe it will take out, yes, it can still go like this. Here again, this is an imbalance,
test it, but I've just tried three times to explain why I'm is, there are more and more arguments here about the fact that we'll still higher timeframes from below and filling the
balances with them by the day. Evgeny. Sorry, but another question: what would you say about a more aggressive stop for Loy before the fifteen-minute balance above, if you mean placing a flat
here. Yes, I categorically don't recommend this only because, well, I mean not only because. And first of all, because the imbalance here was literally stabbed by this small shadow.  candles its very base and in such cases, especially
if its range is wider, we can often return to 05 again will simply be activated. Therefore, if you have a conservative approach. But I consider this kind of stop loss setting to be conservative in principle for this whole manipulation. Yes,
which broke our structure and gave us a downward impulse to place a stop loss and you get about CT, then it’s better to do it like this based on experience. Yes, you will then conduct experiments if here, for example, this imbalance is a minute-long
complete failure and there was a safer formation, then it would be possible to take a risk. Each situation is unique. You need to look at the subject each time. I understood that the question is. Thank you very much. Guys, let’s move
slowly further. Because we still won’t fit into 3. fine, ask, but just that the same thing should n’t be repeated three times.
Dasha is lucky here, they gave an lucky here, they gave an immediate reaction, more precisely, a repeat test of this breaker and this whole manipulation. They gave another test, but it often happens that
this movement that started here broke the structure, it immediately continues like this, and it removes these nearby pools. And you already  They don't give nearby pools. And you already  They don't give
Bitcoin had such a direct impulse, it's not particularly typical for a minute. Let's see what we have on the clock. It
stood on one side, yes, but you never know. Will it happen or not? It was The four-hour price could have made a deviation from below here, back to the range, and here it could have happened further. Anything, so
take your closest one to Tem while you study and, let's say, please, you study and, let's say, please, so there is that we have one to Tem here
so there is that we have one to Tem here
let's write down. Essentially, it was lucky that Bitcoin was fast here, in my opinion. All weekend, I was brainwashed here, I was just lucky that such a squeeze was there, there was a similar situation there too. If we have time today, I'll show it and it was
making my nerves all weekend, someone too, but because Igor published this situation in the analytics channel. We'll get to this situation yet. Here, it was lucky that there was a fast squeeze
and such a fly-by. So, let's see what happened movement because for a bettor such a large short in
large short in percentage is quite rare, just like this, in minute, so quickly, most likely, there was probably some news, I don’t know, I don’t exactly. And what I don’t like is that Well, it’s clear that
after such movements there will always be large areas of their balance. I’ll open the hourly chart again. Oh, there large areas of their balance. I’ll open the hourly chart again. Oh, there essentially two of them. Well, I would combine all this into one and below there is such a tail, usually it’s
always here in the sideways movement, like this, and it forms for a long time, there’s nowhere to especially pick up on the Long here because you understand that after some time we will most likely come to this balance. But usually it’s
difficult to catch on after such spills because such a long wick remains. Let’s see what happened next, and they are already testing this imbalance, they
immediately literally bought off the spill and immediately began testing it. immediately began testing it.
which lasted many hours. We worked with students on many more transactions, learning to correctly analyze the context. Therefore, if you like this video, then write about it in If there
are a lot of your comments and I understand that this format is in demand, I will soon post a continuation of this CTE, which will show many other interesting trades and answers. Many questions from beginners will be answered, including both profitable and
If you want a continuation, write about it in the comments, and I write about it in the comments, and I will also be grateful for a like and a
subscription. Good luck to everyone and trade wisely.