---
title: 'AI Ragebaiters will do what they do best...'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=5mEC0eJeERw'
video_id: '5mEC0eJeERw'
date: 2026-08-17
duration_sec: 105
channel: 'kat ''n chat'
---

# AI Ragebaiters will do what they do best...

> Source: [AI Ragebaiters will do what they do best...](https://youtube.com/watch?v=5mEC0eJeERw)

## Summary

The video analyzes an AI-generated comic that ridicules the debate over AI art, criticizing people who want the recognition of a skilled artist without putting in the practice. The speaker, an artist, points out that even the stick figure in the comic was created using AI, which undermines the ragebait's entire argument about deserving the same art.

### Key Points

- **The Ragebait Comic** [00:00] — A comic posted on r/defendingAIarts shows a person drawing a poor stick figure, and another person generating a realistic baseball player with Gemini, while anti-AI people are angry and think it's good but can't admit it.
- **Empathy and Reality** [00:36] — The speaker acknowledges the frustration of being bad at drawing, but reminds that every artist started as a bad artist and had to improve over years.
- **Years of Practice** [00:50] — Artists put in years studying technique, anatomy, shading, and rendering to reach their current ability.
- **Skipping the Learning** [01:03] — The person in the comic wants the same recognition as skilled artists but refuses to do the learning, demanding the result without the effort.
- **The Ultimate Irony** [01:15] — The speaker notes that the comic itself used AI to draw the stick figure, and even the baseball is incorrectly drawn, showing the creator didn't even draw their own stick figure.

## Transcript

AI is a dream come true. It's like a AI-generated comic panel where the best I can draw." And it's a stick figure trying to like hit a baseball. And then a bunch of people with shirts that say "Anti-AI Club." They're all
skill and you suck." And then the next frame is a person being really happy with a super highly rendered drawing of a baseball player. And they say, player action pose detail textures on a beautiful day." And then it's them next
to two anti-AI people, the same people who are thinking, "This is so good, but we can't admit it." And the person in the middle is really happy. Oh my god, dude, the rage bait, man. I can empathize with the frustration of being
bad at something, but the reality is every single artist who started drawing at some point sucked at it, okay? We've all been there where we drew something, we put pen to paper, pen to tablet, and it looked like ass. And you look at it
and you're like, "Man, I freaking suck." The difference is we put in the time. We learn how to draw, to learn technique, to learn anatomy, to learn shading, to where we are today. The person in the comment just didn't do the learning part
expert. They were like, "Well, now I can have the same art that you guys have. Why are you mad at me for it? I should have this. I should have this art. I accolade that comes with it anyways." You know, okay, on a complete side note,
you know what I think the absolute irony of this is? They used AI baseball. Like the baseball isn't even drawn correctly. Like bro didn't even draw their own stick figure. This is why I like I want to
I want to be empathetic, but like come on, you didn't even draw your own goddamn stick figure. You're telling me you can't even do that?