---
title: '¿Es YouTube más estricto con sus requisitos de Partnership? #shorts'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=N1Vlis32a18'
video_id: 'N1Vlis32a18'
date: 2026-08-17
duration_sec: 72
channel: 'UrbVic'
---

# ¿Es YouTube más estricto con sus requisitos de Partnership? #shorts

> Source: [¿Es YouTube más estricto con sus requisitos de Partnership? #shorts](https://youtube.com/watch?v=N1Vlis32a18)

## Summary

YouTube has announced a significant change to its Partner Program requirements, doubling the watch hours and Shorts views needed for monetization. This video discusses the implications, compares YouTube's approach to other platforms, and asks whether the stricter requirements are justified.

### Key Points

- **New Watch Hours Requirement** [00:02] — The minimum watch hours to qualify for the partnership program is now 8,000 hours in the last 365 days, double the previous requirement.
- **New Shorts Views Requirement** [00:17] — Alternatively, creators need 20 million views on Shorts in the last 90 days, also double the previous threshold.
- **Early Partnership Unchanged** [00:17] — The early partnership tier (1,000 subscribers and 3,000 hours) remains unchanged, but the full program requirements have doubled.
- **Is It Worth It?** [00:32] — The video questions whether the stricter requirements are fair, but concludes that it is still worth pursuing despite the difficulty.
- **Quality vs. Quantity** [00:47] — Unlike platforms like Kick and Twitch, which have minimal requirements, YouTube's stricter standards aim to maintain high production quality.

## Transcript

the minimum number to qualify for the partnership program would be 8,000 hours, double the current number in the last 365 days or [music] 12 months.  Or 20 million views of shorts in the last
90 days.  They are literally doubling the requirements to be without changing anything I just told you about the early partnership which consists of 3,000 hours.  And well, the 1000 subscribers, having 1000 subscribers.
Now, is this okay?  Is it wrong?  Hey, what's up with YouTube?  He doesn't like us. difficult?  Isn't it worth it?  Yes, it's worth it .  Orb, tell me your opinion on this. Because?  Because unlike all the other platforms, whose
approach seems to be, look, we make it easier for you to monetize and we don't impose so many requirements, the production level of these streams has dropped significantly, and aspire to have a high production because it's enough to simply
This is speaking of the world of streaming because Kick's requirements are minimal and Twitch's are practically non-existent.