---
title: 'Improve Your Entries by 50%'
source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=Sqh3eASuKns'
video_id: 'Sqh3eASuKns'
date: 2026-07-28
duration_sec: 2025
---

# Improve Your Entries by 50%

> Source: [Improve Your Entries by 50%](https://youtube.com/watch?v=Sqh3eASuKns)

## Summary

The video is a live stream where the speaker addresses common concerns about trading entries, particularly regarding timing and accuracy. He introduces three possible scenarios for entries—logical, seemingly logical but wrong, and unknown—and provides principles to improve entry decisions by 50%.

### Key Points

- **Introduction and Purpose** [00:18] — The speaker explains that the live stream was prompted by DMs about entry concerns, particularly regarding when to enter trades.
- **Short Guide on Entry Principles** [01:01] — The speaker promises a short guide with principles that have helped improve entries and exits, aiming to teach in under 40 minutes.
- **50% Improvement Promise** [01:57] — He claims that viewers can improve their entries by at least 50% (1.5 times better) by applying the principles shared.
- **Personal Week Recap** [02:24] — The speaker shares that his trading week was negative with two losses and one small profit, emphasizing that losses are part of the process.
- **Three Possible Scenarios** [03:05] — He introduces three scenarios for trading: Logical, Seeming logical but wrong, and I don't understand.
- **Logical Scenario Defined** [03:50] — The logical scenario occurs when all points are in favor using institutional logic, such as on Friday's example.
- **Time Zone Importance** [05:21] — The speaker recommends selecting a time zone (e.g., New York session 8-11) for highest volatility and applying strategies accordingly.
- **Friday's Example** [06:54] — He analyzes Friday's London expansion and New York reversal, explaining how to identify the logical scenario.
- **Common Mistake: Trading Wicks** [08:17] — A frequent error is immediately taking a trade at a wick without confirmation from lower timeframes.
- **Using Directional and Entry Timeframes** [09:08] — He explains combining directional timeframes (e.g., 15 min) with entry timeframes (5 min, 1 min) to refine entries.
- **Manipulation Analysis** [10:43] — After manipulation above a high, he looks for order blocks on lower timeframes to determine direction.
- **DXY as Confirmation** [12:23] — The dollar index (DXY) can help increase logical analysis by showing divergences with currency pairs.
- **Order Block Selection** [15:08] — He prefers taking the last opposing candle with the highest volume rather than the immediate last candle.
- **Three Questions for Logical Scenario** [16:44] — To confirm a logical scenario, ask: Where am I? What time is it? What do smaller timeframes say?
- **Second Scenario: Seeming Logical but Wrong** [17:41] — He shares a loss example where the entry seemed logical but failed due to ignoring cumulative range and time frame.
- **Acceptance of Losses** [20:01] — The difficult part is accepting when an entry is wrong, not taking the entry itself.
- **Third Scenario: I Don't Understand** [22:12] — When the market is unclear, the best action is to stay out and accept not knowing.
- **Holding Trades Problem** [24:02] — Letting a winner turn to break-even often leads to emotional decisions and further losses.
- **Four Conclusions** [26:21] — 1) Logical entry has entry point, exit point, trigger. 2) DXY increases logic. 3) Accepting wrong entries is key. 4) Direction is sum of confirmations.
- **Book Recommendation on Acceptance** [30:13] — He recommends a book by a famous Spanish psychologist about accepting things beyond control, which improves trading mindset.
- **Future Plans and Giveaway** [31:52] — He plans to share the manual berry trading strategy, hold a Zoom Q&A, and give away three 25,000 challenges to random commenters.

### Conclusion

Improving trading entries involves understanding three scenarios, using confirmation tools like DXY and lower timeframes, and—most importantly—accepting that not every trade will be a winner. Emotional control and acceptance of losses are fundamental to long-term success.

## Transcript

dear friends. Welcome to this new broadcast. It's been a while since I've done a YouTube live stream, and yesterday the idea came to me—well, the day before yesterday, no, better yet, yesterday. Yesterday afternoon, the idea to do
this came to me. It started because of some questions I found in my DMs, and I realized that the questions all revolved around the same topic: the entry. There were many, many—the
correct word would be many—concerns regarding the entry from last week, or the week before last. So let me make sure you can hear me hear me perfectly, and then we can
begin. But since yesterday, looking at my DMs, I was seeing that there were quite a few doubts about the entry from last week, and it wasn't so much about "enter now" and "exit now," but rather, knowing that there's a possible scenario that could occur, how
can I determine the most correct point to enter? Based on that, I thought of creating a short guide, some small principles that have helped me in recent weeks, both to lose and to win, and to close
trades a little faster than usual.  Because I think that 's also a science or an art—the art of knowing when to exit with a little more efficiency or when it's not the right or perfect opportunity. We're going to do this live session
together with Telegram. I'll be sending you some hints through Telegram that will complement the guide I'm going to give you today, and I promise that in less than 40 minutes I'm going to teach you some things that will
improve your trading. I can see that your entries will improve by at least 50%, that is, your entries will improve by at least 50%, that is, 1.5 times better. Obviously, these are principles that have helped me with
principles that have helped me with experience, but I like to highlight them and bring them to light in the middle of a definition so that you can improve this aspect. So, this last week really
tell you that I've had much better weeks. This week wasn't good for me in the sense that I had two losses, one day I did
n't trade at all, and one day I had a profit, but the profit was small, it was one for one. Therefore, my week ended somewhat negatively because the profit  One by one I was able to recover one loss, but not the other. That doesn't mean it was a
was simply a week understanding that we have the probability of both I want to teach you something we're going to call three possible scenarios, and I'm going to write them out now on Telegram so you can follow along. It's
the chat open. "Three Possible Scenarios"—that's basically going to be the title and where we're going to focus the definition of this live broadcast. These three possible scenarios
are three things that can happen while I'm trading, and based on these three I'm trading, and based on these three scenarios, I have to decide what to do. The first scenario that we're going to see, and we'll see it day by day so we can
understand each scenario, we're going to start with the good stuff. So, the first possible scenario, we're going to call it that—I'll send it to you possible scenario, we're going to call it that—I'll send it to you now through the
is going to be called the "Logical Scenario." The " Logical Scenario" will be on the chart when all the points are in our favor, applying institutional logic. I've defined the term " institutional logic" as the set of
terms or theories that allow us Understanding market movement from one point to another when we apply logic—that's what happened on Friday. I know many of you took this post, which looked like a
super beautiful post, and yesterday I was surprised because even on Friday—sorry, because today is Sunday—I was surprised because I didn't even know it was Friday. I don't know what happened to my mental calendar, but I hadn't realized it
was Friday. But on Friday, when I thought it was Thursday or Wednesday, this scenario occurred, and I consider it a scenario that complements the first one, which would be a scenario with
mention a scenario with logic, we obviously need to first understand the definition of what logic is, which I already explained in a moment. After going through that definition, we know that logic is what is applied based
on theories of the movement that can be caused from point A to point B. Understanding that, we need to apply the knowledge we have or that we have transmitted through this YouTube channel of institutional logic, and above all,
apply it at a specific time. Remember that when we operate with Remember that when we operate with this style of strategy, the most important part of those strategies will be the time at which we apply them. It's useless.
I use an order block in the Asian session. For example, if the concepts I'm teaching you are for use in the New York session, then the time zone will play a fundamental role. Those who don't know can
go to the indicators section, find "Time Zone," and select the time zone. I recommend always selecting at least between 8 and 11 because, even though that's not the New York session itself, it is the New York time zone with the highest
volatility. So, once we establish the time zone, we need to know where we stand and what possible movements can occur. I'm going to put some lines here just so you can
that can happen once we're established in a time zone. We can see that in London we have an expansion movement and in New York a reversal. That could be a possible movement. We can see
that in London we have an expansion movement, in New York a discount to continue expanding. We can also see that in London we have an expansion, in New York it continues with the same expansion, and the same but in the opposite direction. Those
are positive movements. We can also see it the other way around, for example, that London has a possible expansion and then a reversal.  In New York, and then another expansion, those are the possibilities, but understanding that everything we're
going to do will be in the direction of probability, or understanding that every decision we can make will obviously have a probability, knowing the scenarios, we can say, come and see,
can say, come and see, review this. We can say that on Friday, the scenario we had was the London session. Obviously, look at it as a complete movement because if we look at each
trend as such, but the complete movement would be from this point to this point. Approximately, in London, I would see it as something like a small expansion that began to originate when the day opened. When the
New York session arrives, we see that small discount in the New York session that surpasses this high and then expands. Basically, the New York movement was a slightly opposite movement, the larger movement to the movement that happened
in London. But so as not to confuse you, what I mean by this is, look, this is, look, when we get to I don't trade London, so when I connect in New York, everything in
London has already happened. But when we get to Friday and we see the session  From New York, we observe the initial movement of New York from 7:30. It's an expansion. This expansion could confuse us because at the moment we're seeing it
it's simply an expansion to continue distributing downwards. Therefore, a mistake that we'll point out here—the first mistake I've seen many of us make when we're waiting for this expansion—let me back up a
better. A mistake that happens a lot when we're waiting for this expansion is that we immediately go to the candle that's leaving a wick, trying to trade wicks. In my case, I don't trade price action based
on candles, only on the price action of the structure, but not on candles. But we see this candle that's leaving wicks, and we think, well, would be good, this order block, these two are the same, and we immediately want to sell.
Observing that, our mind goes into a selling mode, and that's not bad, but remember that we have other tools that can help us know if that sale will be good or bad, or if it will happen like here, where in the
end what it did was distribute towards the next high.  When you move to a smaller timeframe, right at that order block, you start looking for the creation of a new order block. And that's one of the best
confirmations I use to know if that point is good. It's true, but with a fence manual, or at least with the strategies I taught you on generally my directional timeframes, and 5 minutes and 1 minute are
generally my entry timeframes. Therefore, if I find that the expansion in 5 minutes arrived and created an order block, that wouldn't be a necessary confirmation to move to a smaller timeframe. Let's put what I just said into order.
We have the first red square: my directional timeframes, and the second square: my entry timeframes. If I difficult for me to find an entry with few stop-loss pips.
entry timeframes, it's difficult for me to find a good direction. stop-loss pips. So what I do is a small combination. If I'm going to use an hourly timeframe, I at least complement it.  With 5 minutes, if I'm going to use 15
supplement it with 5 or 1 minute. But what I never do is stick to just this one chart, which would be the entry timeframes, and use C and 1. It's totally forbidden. I use the 5 and 1 minute timeframes to
find the direction, and the entry would be on a very, very small timeframe. We'll see this in more detail this week, but there we get to the prohibition. So, one way we can save ourselves a little from
scenarios that seem a bit obvious, we wait for lower timeframes used, since there are hundreds and we don't know which one is the correct one.
Continuing with this part, we observe that there is manipulation above that high. So right now, we can analyze with institutional logic. We observe that surely in this low, on small timeframes,
there is something interesting. For example, in this case, we can observe that it is a block order on the 5- minute timeframe. That block order is not something am simply analyzing it to try to understand the origin of that movement after I
see  I understand that order block is a trigger. The trigger will direct me towards the next high and low. In this case, it was this high. When there's manipulation above a high or a low, I have two
options: I can take a discount to continue distributing upwards, or there might be manipulation of that high to create a move in the opposite direction. How can I tell? And this is where the
directional and entry timeframes come in. I observe that on entry timeframes come in. I observe that on March 3rd, which was a Friday, a 15-minute directional timeframe. The high was manipulated, and I must try to
be logical with my decisions. Okay, this would be a good point for me to buy. Can you visualize taking a buy order here and placing a stop-loss order here? It wouldn't look so good. Basically, if you trade structure, you would be buying on
a higher high. Structurally speaking, it wouldn't be correct. I don't trade breakout order blocks, but it wouldn't be the right thing to do. So, most likely, after that manipulation, I have to observe what...  It's possible that
when I go to a short timeframe, I start to realize that things are changing a little, that now, after that manipulation, I have triggers up here. I have these same lows, and I could even confirm
with the DXY, which would be the dollar index, that it possibly has the same highs in that case, or a manipulation. Exactly, look what we have here in the dollar index at the same highs. Yes, it manipulated the high, that's why it distributed, and in the euro/dollar index,
in those lows, it didn't manipulate the low. So the only low left to distribute would be the euro/dollar low, and there I have a... but notice that this indication was applied logically. Obviously, it's much easier for me at this moment to
try to tell you to do this and this and this because it already happened, but what we have to be smart about when trying to practice these teachings is to see... Well, if it already happened, then let me see how I can start thinking this
way before it happens, and that's where practice comes in. Since this is an educational video, obviously I'm doing it for educational purposes. I need to have the understand what I'm telling you.  Saying, and after we analyze this
manipulation of the High, which would be in the London session, we can start thinking logically. How would I think logically after this manipulation? Okay, the New York session arrives. The New York session has two
possibilities: either it gives me a discount to continue rising, or it manipulates this High and we go towards the next Low. I have to put the two probabilities I have on the table and try to understand, using the tools I'm handling, what is
most likely to happen because even though this is an ecological scenario, probability is not removed from the table. We get to this point: the High was manipulated, so there is very little probability of a discount and continuing to
the High manipulated? Because the short timeframes are helping me find that next bearish direction. After I of selling, I must wait for that probability to present itself so that I can actually
did. Here, I took this entry one by one; many of you took it better than I did, but the important thing is to understand the movement, and we see that, having my directional timeframe in this case  Over the 15-minute timeframe, what I'm observing is
an expansion that's leaving a gap and creating a returning order block. To be honest, the law of order blocks is very important, and I want to teach you about it here. I know that the order block is the last opposing candle
before the strong move. Personally, lately I haven't been taking the last opposing candle, but rather the last opposing candle with the highest volume. I would have taken this large candle instead of this
small one, at least on the 15-minute timeframe. The fact is that many times the last opposing candle before the strong move is surpasses it in size. Understanding that
we need something weaker to consider it strong, I take this candle just as I would if I were taking another order block in any other scenario. If I see a stronger opposing candle,
I would take that candle—not the opposing candle specifically, but the one with the highest volume in terms of visual size. So, observing the 15- minute timeframe...  I can mark this order block
and I can go to an entry time. I need the address time in the entry time. I have several possibilities to enter. Some, I don't know if they used this same 15-minute block order as
a break block order. I don't see it as nice as a break block order. is this 15-minute expansion. We could use the discount only to see what discount, and notice that the order block and the empty space in
this case would become a high-quality block word, it would be exactly at 60%.  That would possibly be the perfect entry. To be honest, I don't think I took it that perfectly. I think I took it around here or there, I don't
have it marked; I have to check my MetaTrader. But at that specific point, it would have been an incredible opportunity, combining it with the 15-minute chart. This case was a logical scenario, but I want you to notice some details of
how I personally could understand the logic of this scenario. The first thing this scenario "logical," it's because we understood that after the manipulation of this high, there wasn't a high probability for me to buy. The second is that we understood
that these lows were significant lows. The third is that we looked at the smaller timeframes to see if that manipulation was really going to continue or reverse. So, I
could ask myself these three questions: Okay, where am I now? Okay, what time am I at? At the point I'm at, what do the smaller timeframes tell me to confirm the direction I'm going? These three small confirmations
could help us formulate a logical scenario. logical scenario. Let's move on to the second case, which I'm going to Let's move on to the second case, which I'm going to write for the group.  On
logical, a scenario where we understand that we're likely to take an entry, but in the end, it's not as logical as we thought, or we were susceptible to making mistakes at that point. That was the case the
day before that; that day I lost. What I was analyzing was this inefficiency, which I won't explain much in this video. Yes, I'll explain it better this week, but in that case, it's the inefficiency. I was
in that case, it's the inefficiency. I was trying to trade it to sell, ignoring this gap that has a higher probability of being used. But in the same way, I saw it as a good opportunity when I go to a 15-minute timeframe.
In this case, I observe: Well, here there's a small expansion; there's a gap in 15 for a possible order block. It's not the best order block, but I see that the price is reacting when I go to smaller timeframes. I liked it a
was the following: it reached the order block, expanded, and now it's using another order block, and I saw it as an opportunity. But one of the mistakes that I myself...  What I did wrong in this case was what we talked about at the beginning of the other post. I'm going to
big letters. While making this entry, understanding that there wasn't much of a chance, and that it was already 10:10 and that the period where I finish trading was approaching, I didn't pay attention and ended up hitting the
stop loss. I could have avoided that loss if I had been a analyzed the timeframe in relation to where the price was, if I had seen this entire cumulative range on the 5-minute timeframe, but I didn't,
and in the end, I took that loss. I understand that at the time, I saw that entry as logical, and that's something that happens to many of us: when trading live, the entry looks good. After it's lost, we often
say, "Oh well, it didn't look so good, but live, really, it looked great," and that's totally normal. Obviously, since we can't we simply work with projections of things we understand and see happening, but in the
logical when the trade is lost. When things don't go well, we see that the operation wasn't so good. How can we avoid these kinds of scenarios? I think that many
times the issue isn't avoiding it, but how we feel when this scenario happens. And that's where a key part of this second point comes in, which I'm going to send you through the Telegram group. I think
think complicated in terms of acceptance, but when it enters the mind, it's not so easy for us to digest. The entry itself is n't that difficult; anyone can
determine an entry point. The difficult thing is accepting when the entry difficult thing is accepting when the entry is wrong, and that's where the error comes in. identify if I said, "What happens to you right now? You take a
loss, you still have hope in that entry, and you place another trade, and another trade, and then you change direction." And that happens when trades that seem logical. We don't accept that we made a mistake. Taking
the entry is simple; anyone could take the entry. Any of the thousands can say, "Well, I think it's going to go up," and place a buy order. But the  The point is when that purchase is lost. Who can correctly accept that, "Okay, it's
lost, and I'll come back tomorrow"? Who has the necessary responsibility to take maximum care of their account with the goal of not losing it? And here comes the interesting part: many are looking to get lucky. "I picked this
good entry, great! I'm happy for today." How many entries have you taken that you left to chance and they've paid off? In my place an entry on chance, it loses, and it ends up hurting me more because I placed the
entry on chance. So, this aspect, I think, is very important aspect, I think, is very important for us to analyze. It's not about taking the entry, but about accepting when that entry, which we had already taken the risk
of taking, is lost. This would be the second scenario. I thought it was a logical probability, but in the end, it turned out not to be as logical as I not to be as logical as I thought. So, let's look at the third
the "I don't understand" scenario. Many of us do this, and it happens to me a lot Telegram. I don't know if you've seen the polls that I sometimes share and post...  Buying, selling, or I don't know, sometimes I even say "I don't know" because there are
some scenarios I really don't understand, and that's where we make mistakes. You might think, "Oh wow, but he knows everything," and it's literally possible that I know many things less than you or that I have very little experience
than you or that I have very little experience compared to other traders out there. And that makes me not understand all the scenarios, but I try to approach my trading imperfectly and understand that the more I accept
imperfection and the more I accept not knowing, the better I can be. That's why on Wednesday, I literally didn't know exactly what was going to happen. I saw that exactly what was going to happen. I saw that a high was created in the New York session; I saw that
reversal, but in my mind, the best thing that could happen was... I saw that some people told me, "But he manipulated the high from the previous day." That manipulation of the high from the would have preferred it to be a little smaller. It was almost 50 pips,
but in my mind, I didn't have anything clear. I didn't know if I was going to buy at the discount, I didn't know if I should sell, I didn't know if I should stop at this point, and that's why this was going to be a day of "I don't know" scenarios. That acceptance of the three scenarios of
When it makes sense, or when I think it makes sense and I'm wrong, or when I don't know what's going to happen, that's what will form the complete set of probabilities and bad. In the end, I'll have a sum of all the trades I
have a positive or negative result, depending on how many times I managed to control myself when I did n't know the scenarios or when the scenarios didn't turn out as I wanted. It will also depend on at what point I exited when
the probability was in my favor, because it often happens that we take a sell order at this point, for example, and we want the probability to be in our favor. And we never close that sell order; instead, we
time, constantly waiting, hoping. Imagine this scenario, which I know almost all of going well, you leave the MetaTrader, and when you return, the entry
is positive, everything is perfectly fine. You're happy, you continue with your day-to-day activities, I do n't know, playing on the computer, whatever. And when you return, the entry is at breakeven, you yourself...  You try to understand yourself, and you say, "Okay,
a break-even is fine," but deep down, that feeling of "break-even" is getting to you. You go back to the computer, try to find another scenario to fill the void left by that break-even, which you allowed to stay there.
possibly the other entry is lost. Then you take another, and that one is lost too. And when you have those two losses, you start thinking about the past and you say, " Wow, I should have stayed with that break-even, and it wouldn't have affected me. Now I feel worse."
So, those decisions made in moments of anger—in this case, anger at us for not having been right about the direction—are the situations that burn through an account. I've never seen someone with 0.5%
to burn through an account. I have seen people lose a challenge with low risk, with 0.5% or 1%, but I haven't seen people take over a personal account with 0.5%. Whenever they burn through it, it's because they make bad decisions. So, that day, I
about the scenarios that were happening; I didn't know what I was going to do. Obviously, I can take it a little easier because I'm not taking on funded. I know that when you're taking on a challenge, the pressure increases, but
literally, the difficult part isn't just passing the challenge. There are many times when keeping that account funded. So, if you can't taking the challenge, it's very likely that you also won't be able to control a
funded account when the money being made is basically almost yours until you withdraw it. So, that part is super important to note. Looking at these three possible scenarios, I was able to draw a few conclusions that will
allow us to improve. Above all, these scenarios are one, two, three conclusions. So, I'm going to send you the three conclusions so our entries with these main scenarios. I'm going to number one the first
conclusion, and it says: A logical entry has an entry point, an exit point, and a trigger. When we were looking at and analyzing the first entry from the beginning, we noticed that we
determined in short timeframes. We had a possible exit point, and our  The trigger was basically the combination of 5 minutes with the 15 minutes in this discount with Word of Block. A logical entry always, always, always
has those three virtues: an entry point, an exit point, and a trigger. Many times we have the entry point and the trigger, but we don't know where we're going to exit. And in the exit, I think there's a
cover this week, where we get very confused. We take a good Ray King, and many times the entry doesn't break even, many times it's a loss because we don't even move to break even. So that would be the first conclusion: a
logical entry has an entry point, an exit point, and a trigger. Here I show you the second conclusion, which I'm
conclusion, which I'm also writing out for you. The second conclusion says that the DXY, which would be the dollar index, can help increase my level of logic, understanding that the DXY is simply
dollar currency and has nothing to do with the other currency that makes it up, in this the secondary currency, which in this case is the dollar. This allows us to see that there is no
decision regarding...  The exchanges: Here there is indeed an exchange decision decision regarding the exchange itself. Rather, the DXY price is determined by other factors, therefore it cannot be manipulated in terms of the
transactions being made and distributed from point A to point B. Unlike a currency, if we observe the dollar index, it already gave us an indication before the New York session began that that point for
for the euro/dollar, were not going to be distributed immediately due to the small divergence between the two. Here, the high was reached, the same high of the same hour, and in the euro/dollar, the low of the same hour was not reached. Therefore,
the low of the same hour was not reached. Therefore, that point, for me, is a point I would be watching, but not immediately. So the DXY can help increase my logic. I could compare it with what
current scenario with any pair I am trading that involves the dollar. In this case, since I only trade the euro/dollar, I do it here. And finally, the third conclusion would be that the entry is not as difficult as it seemed.  What I told you, no,
sorry, there are one, two, four conclusions, not three, there are four. The third conclusion wouldn't be the last one, it would be the entry. It's not so difficult; the difficult thing is accepting when the entry is wrong.
We can accept this part in many ways, and it's something we work on within ourselves. I would recommend a book in this live stream if you want to to accept—the loss, the mistake, or
when you do something wrong, or when something bad happens in your life, and it's not so recommend is by a very famous Spanish psychologist who helped me a lot with this because peace and happiness truly lie in accepting the things we cannot control.
And if we have peace and happiness, our analysis will obviously be better because we don't have worries at the moment. Therefore, the entry isn't so difficult; we need to learn to
accept when the entry is wrong. And finally, the direction is the sum of confirmations toward one side of the probability. The direction isn't a trick, or something I can tell you: "Look, this is the direction," or "Get the
direction like this." No. The direction is the sum of how many confirmations I have to buy and how many confirmations I have to sell.  A higher probability on the side with more confirmations, since we
are simply retail traders or speculators, we don't have market. We are simply trying to past information or concepts created by other people. Therefore, our theory
or logic when analyzing is very susceptible to failure. That's why emotional control—that aspect is so fundamental—because it will allow us to accept that the things we use are not perfect. No,
calming yourself down when you feel bad; that's not the objective. Rather, it's about accepting the concepts you are using, and that acceptance allows you to know, "Okay, I lost. I
probability of losing, even though my probability of winning was greater. The my probability of winning was greater. The direction is simply not a trick. It's simply the sum of the
probability, toward selling or toward buying. These are the only two things that can happen in the market. So, friends, to wrap up this live stream, tomorrow I will share the schedule. Today I will possibly do it during the session.
From New York, so we can actively observe the market. We're going to start with the manual berry trading strategy, part one. What I'll be teaching in this set of lessons is how I'm looking for direction. That would be part one: how I
'm looking for entry points and how I 'm looking to hold trades. 'm looking to hold trades. strategy I created some time ago and still maintain, lies in those three main concepts.
So, you're going to improve a lot this week. We're going to focus on that some doubts because my trading constantly changes. Sometimes I haven't shared the changes I've made in recent months or weeks, and I'm
going to take advantage of this week to do so. So, to make things easier, I'm going to do it on YouTube because I understand that if I do it here, I limit it to a Zoom meeting, it would be more difficult. What I'm going to do is, at the end of the
manual berry trading section, I'm going to hold a small contest so that a few people can ask me questions directly in a Zoom meeting about everything we've covered. watch the complete material we'll be covering. In these next 3 days,
friends, after that, oh, I'm also going to choose three random comments from this video, and I'm going to give them a 25,000 challenge. Three random comments, any comments, I don't
have a specific one. If you put something good, something bad, or whatever you want three random comments that came to this class and I'm going to give them a 25,000 challenge. So, friends, without anything else to say, see you
in the next video, which will be tomorrow in the Hurdles Bootcamp Manual, Part One, or Day One. Thanks for tuning in to the stream. Bye bye and kisses.