--- title: 'The Truth About the ICT Trading Strategy | You''re Not Profitable Because of THIS' source: 'https://youtube.com/watch?v=QsrA4j6eMbM' video_id: 'QsrA4j6eMbM' date: 2026-08-03 duration_sec: 1655 --- # The Truth About the ICT Trading Strategy | You're Not Profitable Because of THIS > Source: [The Truth About the ICT Trading Strategy | You're Not Profitable Because of THIS](https://youtube.com/watch?v=QsrA4j6eMbM) ## Summary The video critiques the ICT (Inner Circle Trader) trading strategy, arguing that its overwhelming number of concepts and terminology confuse traders and hinder profitability. The creator, Benjamin, shares his own experience and suggests simplifying to a few core concepts for better clarity and success. ### Key Points - **Introduction and Claim** [00:03] — Benjamin introduces the video by stating that if you've been using ICT for months or years without profitability, it's not your fault but the fault of ICT's strategy itself. - **Creator's Background** [00:18] — Benjamin has over 7 years of trading experience and has withdrawn more than $300,000 from funding companies. His strategy focuses on liquidity points and market opening hours. - **Adapting ICT Concepts** [01:11] — He adapted ICT's killzones, shortening the Forex session from 1pm-5pm to 2pm-4:30pm based on backtesting, as trading outside these hours was unprofitable. - **ICT's Appropriation of Concepts** [02:04] — ICT claims concepts were given by a 'guy in a forest', but many concepts like liquidity, imbalances, and FVGs were already explained in Wyckoff's strategy from the 1960s. - **ICT Strategy is Bad** [04:32] — Benjamin states that ICT's strategy is bad because it has over 100 terms that confuse traders, leading to analysis paralysis and preventing profitability. - **Overwhelming Number of Concepts** [05:11] — He shows a screenshot listing 50-100 ICT concepts, many of which are repetitive, causing confusion and making it impossible to have mental clarity when trading. - **Repetitive Concepts** [07:03] — Examples: BOS (Break of Structure) and CHoCH (Change of Character) are similar; MSS (Market Structure Shift) is the same as CHoCH; MSB (Market Structure Break) is another repetition. - **Liquidity Terminology** [08:10] — Buy-side and sell-side liquidity are the same as high and low liquidity; equal highs/lows and relative equal highs/lows are essentially the same concept. - **Order Blocks and Variations** [09:46] — Order blocks, breaker blocks, mitigation blocks, etc., are all variations of the same concept: the last candle opposite to the impulse. He criticizes the need for so many names. - **Imbalance and FVG** [11:23] — CBI, BISI, imbalance, and FVG are all the same concept: a gap between the first and third candles. He criticizes the marketing-driven renaming. - **Optimal Trade Entry and Fibonacci** [12:17] — OTE, premium/discount, and equilibrium are all Fibonacci retracement levels (50%, 0.63, etc.), yet they are presented as separate concepts. - **More Repetitive Terms** [13:11] — Institutional candle, displacement, expansion, and jet fuel candle all mean impulse. Efficiency/inefficiency is another term for imbalance. - **Contradiction and Confusion** [15:00] — ICT criticizes indicator traders but introduces hundreds of concepts that clutter charts. He lists many models (Venom, Silver Bullet, etc.) that are just repackaged ideas. - **Any Chart Event Has a Name** [16:17] — With 200 concepts, any market movement can be labeled as a valid entry, leading to overtrading and no clear edge. - **Trading Hours Contradiction** [17:01] — ICT says market moves only at certain times, but then introduces many sessions (London open/close, New York open/reversal, etc.), requiring traders to watch the chart all day. - **CRT and Turtle Soup** [20:37] — CRT (Candle Range Theory) is just a rebranded version of ICT's Turtle Soup concept, popularized by Romeo, who is accused of being a scammer. - **Conclusion and Advice** [23:16] — Benjamin advises sticking to a few core concepts: liquidity points, trading sessions (London and New York opens), and entry confirmations, to avoid confusion and improve profitability. ### Conclusion The video concludes that ICT's strategy is overly complex and confusing, and traders should simplify their approach by focusing on a few key concepts to achieve clarity and profitability. ## Transcript with the ICT strategy for months or even years and you're still not profitable, stay tuned to this video because I'm going to explain all the reasons why you're still not making money in trading. And you know what the worst part of all is? It's not your fault, it's the fault of all is? It's not your fault, it's the fault of ICT itself and its strategy. If you don't know me, I'll introduce myself quickly. My name is Benjamin and I have been dedicating my time to trading for over 7 years. And I have currently withdrawn more than $300,000 in payouts with funding companies. My trading strategy is based and lows, which is where all the market's liquidity is found and the market tends to react to those points. and also mainly during market opening hours, that is , the opening of the London Stock Exchange and the opening of the New York Stock Exchange, which would be from 9 to 11 a.m. Spain time, which would be the opening of London, and from 2 p.m. would be the opening of the New York session. There are certain concepts that ICT explains or applies that I personally incorporated into my trading strategy. For example, the schedules, the Kilzones that he explains, well, I personally took them, I adapted them because it is true that he, for example, in the Forex session, puts from 1 pm to I think it's approximately 5 pm New York Kilzone. And I personally, through backtesting and with my experience in the market, saw that trading before 2 pm and after 4:30 pm was practically a waste of time because there was hardly any volatility and hardly any movement in Forex. Sometimes there are, but most of the time there aren't, so I decided to shorten that schedule. Also, for example, the issue of imbalances, of FVG, which are ultimately the same thing, well, I also apply them in my way of operating, in my trading strategy. But this is something I wanted to highlight. Many of you trade ICT, trade similarly to ICT, or use some of its concepts, and what angers me about all this is that ICT itself has appropriated the Smart Money strategy, hasn't it? He started spreading all this kind of strategy, all these concepts, and he said, he always commented, he always explained that these concepts were given to him by a guy in a forest, who was a subject of God, I don't know, I've seen some things on his Twitter that really make you a little about whether ICT is good in the head or not. But anyway, putting that on trading, he has actually taken over many concepts and many strategies that came from the past. In other words, many of the concepts liquidity intake, impulses, imbalances, FVG, all that kind of stuff, have already been explained for quite a few years. For example, in Wof's strategy, which already talks about accumulations, distributions, accelerations, imbalances, possible FVGs, manipulations, all those things are already explained in what I think is a book by Wof. And this, if I'm not mistaken, someone please correct me, I think it comes from the 60s or earlier. In other words, all these concepts were already explained in the past with Wov, and what he has practically done is remodel all those concepts, give them a nice name, a fancy name, as they say in English, true that perhaps he has added certain things or brought it more into the present day because it is true that Quof's book, for example, I have tried to read it and it is totally unreadable. You watch an ICT video that 's also unwatchable because the guy might be really good at trading, but he's terrible at explaining and teaching. These are 4-hour videos where he doesn't even cut anything, and this just means he can't watching a 4-hour video where he doesn't explain And saying, "Look how good I am, how good I am, how good I am, but it anything at all." But anyway, apart from that, apart from what I'm telling you, the concepts of ICT or the strategy that ICT explains, the vast majority is explained in the this has, well, if I'm not mistaken, I think it comes from the 60s, so he has brought it to the present day, he has changed four or five concepts, but ultimately it is exactly the same. Accumulation, sprinting, manipulations, all that kind of stuff is already explained in Wof and remodel it, give it a nice touch and say that this strategy is his and appropriate it, but it's not really like that . This has already been explained for quite a few years. This means that ICT, the ICT strategy, is very bad, right? In fact, as I told you at the beginning of the video, I personally have ICT strategy or WKOF, however you want to see it, because it practically comes from Wof and Marmoney comes from Wof. And I've taken some of those incorporated them into my way of operating, into my way of seeing the market. And like I said, I also operate with those concepts, and I've slightly remodeled mine with my with the experience and background I'm gaining, but there are some ICT concepts that are very good. What is the main problem and why the vast majority are not profitable with ICT? The problem is that I currently believe there are more than 100 terms that ICT explains in its strategy. And now I'm going to put a screenshot here. I'm going to list all the concepts here, and this number keeps increasing every year . Currently, as I'm telling you, there are 100 or 200 concepts and terminology that only serve to confuse you in the actually start analyzing, you don't even know what you 're seeing anymore, because you have 300 're seeing anymore, because you have 300 imbalances, 300 order blocks, 300 PDA R, 300 pieces of nonsense that only serve to confuse your mind and prevent you from trading, causing analysis paralysis. Now we're going to look at all those terms impossible to be profitable with a trading strategy, whether it's ICT or Pepito Flores, that has so many terms and so much confusion in your head, that it's impossible to have mental clarity when you're going to trade having all those a trade. It's practically impossible, but not with ICT or with Pepito Menganito. It's impossible to operate with a strategy that has so many factors because this only confuses you and ultimately gets you lost in so much terminology. Here we have all the concepts, or the vast majority of the concepts, that ICT uses, so you can see what I'm saying: the number of concepts there are, and even concepts that are very repeated because they constantly different, and then tell you that it's an different analysis concept than what was there before. I do n't know how many concepts I have on the screen, but well, around 50, 100 concepts approximately, that's what I can see at a glance. And what we're seeing is, as I said, the analysis we're going to have to do on the chart to interpret and locate all these concepts, because according to him, all these concepts are example, without going any further, first we have the price structure, which would be the famous boss, okay? Break of structure. Excuse my English, I don't know . Okay, then we would have the sudden change of character, which is, well, one is a break in structure that the price then follows the trend, right? In other words, if it's bullish, then a boss rise, and a checkpoint basically means that the it would break the last low that created that last bullish impulse. But look, we already have the first repetition of the concept. We would have the market structure shift. This is basically the same as the Ch. The MS is the same as the Ch. It's a bullish or bearish structure to a bullish or bearish structure. In other words, it would be breaking that last point that created that last impulse, so it would be changing the trend, right? So to speak, about the practically the first repeated concept. We've had three, and two have already been repeated. And this is practically the same thing that is repeated in all concepts. There are many terms that are constantly repeated. Look, here we continue with more concepts. Look, for example, we have another concept that I didn't even know about, but look, MSB, which would be market structure break. as the boss or the ch, that is, another concept would be repeated again . Then we would have swing high, swing low, eh liquidity high, liquidity low, which will be repeated with by side liquidity and sell liquidity. What do sellity and by-side liquidity mean? Basically, a liquidity point—if you don't liquidity point, a maximum or minimum where there is liquidity. He calls it " Bside liquidity" when there are buys, " sellity" when there are sells, and this is the same as high liquidity and low liquidity. It's exactly the same thing, but with we would have more liquidity points, which would be equal high equal lows. Relative relative equal high relative equal lows is practically the same as equal lows. Essentially, relative is basically a trend line little higher or lower than the other, and he calls them practically a trend line where liquidity is also generated, but he gives it a more fun name, right? More marketing to tell you, "No, this is not a trend line, this is a relative equal high so that you Then we would have liquidity pools, which is more of the same as same thing, they are maximum and minimum points where there is liquidity. Liquidity, liquidity, this is basically the same as relative equal highs and relative equal lows, because they are trend line points. That's what we would have internal range liquidity, external range liquidity, which is basically exactly the same thing, a maximum point, a minimum point, where the reality. Many of you who know the surely criticize me, but no, no, you 're not saying this right. Dude, most of the concepts are the same and repeated with different names. Accept it and move on. I'm simply making this video to help you and to help you And this is why, it is because of the number of absurd concepts and repetitive concepts and absurd terms that are in the strategy itself. That's why I ICT concepts. Because? Because I believe that the rest, the remaining 100, are absolutely worthless and only serve to confuse you. Smart Money strategy. The smart money strategy deals a lot with order blocks, breaker blocks, mitigation blocks, inversion blocks, bullish engolfing order blocks, and engolfing the price zones and blocks, the order blocks, and you are seeing the number of order blocks there are. An order block is the last candle opposite to the one that generates the impulse. That's it, there's no need to add bu or b or bb. What is this, man? It's necessary to give so many names to a supply block is really a supply and demand zone, which is seen in other strategies such as supply and demand strategy is practically the same. A block order an upward or downward impulse; the market stops there, and theory says that there are many pending orders, which the price will impulse. In short, an order block, but there's no need to add names like but there's no need to add names like Bob, B or BI, BB, BOB, BOP, mitigation block, or investment blocks. Dude, there's no need to put all this nonsense. We have another example, CBI and Bi. In short, an imbalance. The thing is, one is an imbalance in purchases and the other is an imbalance in sales, but to give him a more cocky, more gringo touch, CBI, busy, dude. Imbalance, mate. Dude, don't give me that crap, that 's a different issue. Sometimes it says imbalance and other times it says FVG, which is the same thing. An imbalance is the same as an FVG. Why are you changing my name? To act like a gringo and all that, dude. Imbalance or FVG, but don't change a busy day, a C day, an imbalance day, six concepts come out of one, and so the marketer on duty can analyze the CPI, the Bisi, the imbalance, the FVG, dude, which is the same thing. Stop filling my head with nonsense. It is an imbalance, a gap between the first and third candles. Spot. There is no other story. Don't tell me c and bci squared. Imbalance or emptiness. It's over. It's the same thing. And then we would have gringo touch, a little marketing touch, right? What is OE, the optimal trade entry? That's Fibonacci. Spot. You put in the Fibonacci, Fibonacci retracement from the low to the high, from the high to the low and at 50% or at 0.63 I think is yours, it's your optimal tre. The optimal. Optimal. What, dude? Fibonacci retracement, mate, that's been around longer than Jesus Christ. Don't try to change comic strips. PT Ar, premium discount ar in short, Fibonacci retracement. That's the right and premium AR, that's Fibonacci, mate. That is, five terms: equilibrium, which is the 50% Fibonacci retracement; optimal trade entry, which is 0.63 63, which is the Fibonacci retracement; the premium ID R, which is the 50% Fibonacci retracement; that is, five terms, five concepts, equal Fibonacci retracement. I mean, look at the stories they make up. Then we have other concepts. Institutional candle. You tell me what that is. Displacement, that is, an impulse. Displacement la l, that is, an impulse. Expansion means an impulse. Jet Fel cancel. I have no [ __ ] idea what it is. Dealing range, no idea. Efficiency and inefficiency, that is, imbalance. So , here you've told me about busc and other things, but now instead of imbalance or fvg, you're telling me about efficiency or inefficiency so that you have two more concepts. In other words, if there is no imbalance there is inefficiency, and if there is no inefficiency there is efficiency. In short, it's the same thing: five terms that determine imbalance, that is, a gap five concepts, okay? That's what happens. Volume imbalance. This basically means that the bodies of the candle do n't touch, that's a volume the void of the wicks, which would be the FVG, right? The imbalance, isn't it? You're going to the void of the candle bodies. In other words, I'm going to blow up the void graph, because if there isn't a body void, there will be going to know what's good or what's bad, because I'm going to fill the chart with empty spaces in these rectangles, which actually makes me laugh because in many videos he indicators or stories that other types of traders put in their charts, right? Referring to the fact that I don't, I only analyze price action, I only analyze price action, price action, price action, pressure action. I analyze the algorithm, but dude, if you have 200 concepts, if you're going to have a moving average indicators, you 're seeing the amount of concepts that are here, mate. If you have 100 concepts, you're going to have a chart that looks like a Picasso painting, mate, with so many lines and rectangles. Because if you put 100 concepts into a market analysis, into a chart analysis, you'll have the whole screen covered in concepts. I mean, what you words, you complain on one hand about people who trade with indicators because they don't trade price action, but you introduce 200 repeated concepts every year and every year you come up with a strategy, that is, the Venom Model, the Silver Ballet, the Daily Bias Model, the Daily Profile Model, the ICT 2022 model, the ICT 2023 model, the power sniper model, the SMT entry, the OT entry, the continuate block entry, market maker cell model, market maker by model, SMT, Smart Money Technique, Smart Money Divergence. Dude, you have 400 strategies, mate. How on earth is a person going to be able to analyze a graph with all these concepts? It doesn't make sense, but we're going even further. FVG has refined. This is very fashionable now, the Inverse Fair Value, the IFVG, this is very fashionable now . I personally don't use it if it no longer have the imbalance, right? We don't have the FVG, but now we have the FVG, the volume FVG, that is, that the bodies do not touch. We haven't explained this before, but now we have the inverse First Value Capo, that is can enter the market whenever you want because they will align. Any concept will be that happens on the chart has a name and a strategy for ICT. It's absurd. Whatever happens on the chart, you'll be able to enter; you'll place a trade. Because? Because if it's not one thing, it's another. In other words, if it's not the FVG, it's the IFVG. If it's not the UFBG and not the IFVG, then it's the OT. If it's not the OT, it's the premium on Discount. If it's not the premium discount, it's the Jet Fuel Candle. If it's not that, it's Volume Inbalance. If it's not that one , it's the Venom ICT. If it's not that one, it's the Silver Palet. If it's not that one, it's the Market by Model. In other words, you'll have an point on the chart to trade because you have 200 concepts, and if it's not one, it's in the market all the time, so there's no point in having so many concepts. And then to finish up, we have another thing he refers to a lot: that the market only moves at certain times and he sells a lot, right? in the market for a certain number of minutes, but then you start to analyze his counterproductive. In other words, you're lying to my face, you're peeing in my raining. In other words, you're telling me to trade for only a explain it to you. Look, here we have times and sessions above, that is, the strategies it has, the 200 concepts it has, in theory work. We would have the Kilthons, which are the openings of the stock exchanges, right? but as I said, I personally think that in Forex in London I don't know if it personally start at 9 and in New York the Forex hours start at 1 in the afternoon in the afternoon, which I personally have narrowed down more. I mean, from 2 backtesting and the time I've spent here, I've decided that those and the price doesn't move during those times, so it's pointless to look at the chart during those hours. But then he tells you, the market only moves during these hours." Okay, here's the interesting part. We would have Kilthons, which would be the London Kilon, the New York Kilon. Perfect. I don't know the schedule for right now because these will be n't done for 3 years and I'm not familiar with that the times will be different from the Killzones, so you're already Killzones I'm going to have to operate another schedule which is the reversal times. , this is another time frame that we will have to take into account to trade the market. One more thing about the graph. Then we would have daily words, these are three lines that will appear randomly on the chart where you day, where it opened during the week, and where it opened in each session. More were few on the graph, as if there were few imbalances and few lines, mate. Let's add more lines. Then we would have London Close Manipulation, that is, once, as it says here, the London market closes trading session. In other words, I'm top of that I have to stay until the London session closes, which I think think it's at 6 pm, Spain time. In other words, I'm operating the New York opening, and now I have to operate the London closing. Dude, if I'm going to my regular job, what's the point ? So why are you telling me I'm there all day, I'm operating the London opening, the London closing. And not only that, wait, there's more. New York Reversal, which I 5 or 6 in the afternoon, which is when the volatility of the Well, now he says that's New York Reef. Well, and certain timeframes don't appear here , but I remember there was one that was uh New York Lunch, that is, is, or lunch or whatever there in the United States, well they have another important to operate that session, right? That time fray, that session. In other words, you're already including New York Lunch, London Close, New York Rebellion, London Open, New York Open, and Midnight Open. Dude, let's see what the point is. Although know that the Open is not operated, but rather it is a line that takes into account where , you have the London session, the New York session, Reversal Time, then you have AM session and PM session. It's true that I haven't New York afternoon session. In other words, you 're on the computer all day in New York, the entire London session. That is to say, I spend 24 hours on the PC, Dude, what you a new strategy with new concepts. In fact, I don't know if it appears here, but he once released one called Unicorn Model, which Unicorn Model ICT, I don't remember when it was, a couple of years ago, which was another piece of remodeled concepts and put in so that you would believe that this strategy would And now let's talk about something interesting, which I don't know if you know, but the CRT that has become very fashionable these last few months, well, it also comes from ICT, okay? This man hits all the right notes. Basically, the Turtle is when it takes a maximum minimum and is basically CRT. In other words, if you go to a Turtel sub, to a daily minimum maximum settlement, then you're going to have a CRT there, okay? Therefore, this has already been explained for years by the ICT CRT. The thing is, this has now been taken over by another geeky ghost named Romeo, who has already been involved in various disputes and dangerous scammer has promoted all this, and I'm not making it up, it's public knowledge. I CRT and I'm going to continue trading the way I do. But the one who has given so much attention to all this CRT stuff is Romeo, who was another person who learned from ICT, from Tartel Sub. In hey, Benjamin, are you wrong? I don't care , go to Romeo's Twitter, okay? whose name is Romeo PP, I think it is. And there you'll see if you go back to his tweets from was the tartel sub. The thing is, she's remodeled it again, made it pretty, and now it's called Candle Rage Theory; it's CRT now, period. But their way sub again. In fact, if you think I 'm lying, go to his Twitter account @romeotp or Romeopt, I think it's called, and go to his tweets from 2 years ago and you'll see how he operated Turtle TS Turtle, sub at a certain time, and so on. The thing is, he's made it look nice, rebranded it, a fancy name, CRT, boom, 1000 bucks, CRT. I which was going to make me a millionaire thanks to, instead of saying that sub, call it, call it CRT, okay? But that guy doesn't withdraw from funding accounts, he doesn't withdraw Twitter it's more than obvious that he's a scammer, okay? He has no face or anything at all who the CRT concepts come from. I know this is going to reopen many wounds , which I couldn't care less about. If you want to operate CRTs, go ahead. But just so you know Sub. In fact, as I already told you, on Romeo's Twitter you'll see how he that he changed the name to CRT and has sold I do n't know how many and he is the absolute mentor, right? From CRT. But again, these are fads, these are concepts that ICT already dealt with 78 years ago, the Turtle sub. And just like hm Romeo explained the CRT people, what ICT has been doing and instead of calling it FVG, calling it imbalance, and instead of calling it imbalance, that it is a new concept and a new model. And so the guy has been inventing new strategies for 8, 10, or 15 years. And here the video comes to an end. As I've told you, it's probably not profitable because of the number of concepts that ICT has. strategy, are quite interesting. I personally have taken the Kilsons into account, but as I said, I've shortened them because he I trade, which is Forex, Currencies, from 1 pm to London session, I think he traded it at 8 am, so I've shortened them and I think it's better to shorten them because I see better results that way, but I've such as the imbalance, I've also taken that into account from him, but most of the concepts, 99% of the concepts that he uses, I personally , as you know, I only take into account liquidity, that is, the maximum points, the minimum points, the times, which are those kill zones that I entry confirmations. That's the only thing I take into account in my trading. Notice that he currently has 50, 100, 200 concepts that he models, different stories, simply to convince you that he has best in the world, and all he does is confuse you. The CRT issue that I some of you misunderstand and tell me, "Hey, Benjamin, you're wrong." I don't care whether I'm right The facts are there, okay? Anyone who wants to see it, let them see it. CRT is a concept that comes from the Turtle sub that Romeo, who was the first of all this CRT stuff, operated with a Turtle sub. What did he do? Basically, we just arranged those concepts, called it CRT, and now started selling it on their own. But as I said, the CRT comes from ICT, from the concept that was called Turtle sub, which in short, if you the CRT is, is a liquidity collection. In other daily timeframe, mark its maximum and minimum, that is, its PDH and PDL, you will discover hours you have picked up a maximum or minimum, that is, liquidity, which is practically what I have been explaining here on the channel for about three years. The thing is, as I said, just like with ICT, other people invent much have to sell you, okay? And instead of calling it a CRT tomorrow, they'll And instead of calling it a CRT tomorrow, they'll call it the inverse square trampoline, or instead of calling you the unicorn model, they'll call you the monkey model, and that's it, happens with ICT, so to avoid further confusion, Probably because your head is completely fried. Stick to three or four concepts and don't use the hundreds of concepts he has and explains profitable. In other words, you can't just look at a chart and not know how to interpret it. With the number of concepts he has these days, and he keeps adding more, you're going to have a chart full of errors. And when it doesn't invalidate invalidate it because it's hitting the FVG, or it's hitting a within the New York Lunch, it's not within the TR. You realize this and you say, Some concepts are telling me to Ultimately, you're going to do what you're going to do and what you keep doing: lose money. Because, like I said, just focus on these three concepts. If it where the liquidity is located, trading sessions, specifically the and from 2 pm to 4:30 pm Spain time, and entry confirmations, entry confirmations for. Spot. In short, I have six concepts and he has 200. Well concepts to have more clarity and not suffer from what is called probably suffer from with this type of less confusion, and when you start analyzing the chart, when you start clear about why you are going to enter and why you are not going to enter. That's all, guys, , to be honest, because I've had to look up all the terms and get my hands a little muddy, right? As they say, because there are many people who are big fans of ICT, big fans of CRT, of Romeo or whatever, and saying these kinds upset some people, but I haven't said anything untrue. All these concepts were already explained by ICT 7 or 8 years ago. The thing is, every year they invent how six come out of one concept, and probably next year seven or eight will come out of that concept. Instead of the Unicorn Model or the Venom Model, the Shark Model will be released. And ultimately it's the same thing, but to sell you their authority and new name and all they do is confuse you. That's all, I hope you enjoyed it and see you in the next video.