[00:02] Dear viewers, well, imperialism, it's the opposite of nationalism. I'll never become like you. An empire includes a huge number of peoples in volumes. The idea of ​​a
[00:18] empire by definition presupposes nationality. Nationalism presupposes the institution of citizenship. An empire presupposes the institution of citizenship. Since an empire presupposes, this means the
[00:33] possibility of interpenetration of most regions. This is an impeller with exceptions, there are zones of settlement, perhaps, which perhaps, which means that it inevitably leads to
[00:47] cultural and racial mixing, and so on. That is, one way or another, and an empire is, or another, and an empire is, firstly, a product of the mixing of different populations. One way or
[01:02] another, an empire is always a mixture of nationalism, always exactly the same chewing, and at the same time, nationalism is always citizenship. An empire is always citizenship. That is, but simply, well, these are different things. Nationalism is initially a liberal
[01:18] agenda, unless we're talking about ethnonationalism, but nationalism in an imperial context is also impossible due to the fact that it is... you wake up. All subjects are aggregated in an empire, this has never happened before
[01:32] this has never happened before in the history of mankind, and simply because of this and the imperial one, so that's how it is, and then, and colonized, but colonies, perhaps, in theory, can be in a national
[01:47] state, but not on the same scale as an empire further, I myself don't understand how an empire can be national, I haven't heard of the column,
[02:01] there are examples of a national empire, so Nikita is it on c, by the way, is China a national empire or not, and for years it's not an empire national empire or not, and for years it's not an empire at all,