YouTube's Thumbnail Test is Flawed
45sReveals a shocking flaw in YouTube's official feature that creators rely on, sparking debate.
▶ Play ClipThe video critiques YouTube's A/B thumbnail testing feature, arguing that it measures watch time share instead of click-through rate (CTR), which is misleading. The creator tested the feature on 8 videos and found it ineffective, especially for small channels with low impressions.
The creator initially thought thumbnail testing compares CTR, but YouTube actually uses watch time share to determine the winner.
YouTube states that the winning thumbnail is selected based on the highest share of a video's watch time, arguing that great thumbnails help viewers understand the video and make informed decisions.
The creator argues that watch time depends on video delivery, not the thumbnail, and gives an example of the same script delivered with different energy levels leading to different watch times.
YouTube's statement about ranking videos based on watch time share suggests that channel ranking exists, similar to Google's algorithm, giving big channels an advantage.
Thumbnail testing requires a large sample size, which small channels lack due to low impressions, making the feature useless for them. Tests often take two weeks and end inconclusively.
Even MrBeast initially thought the feature measured CTR, as shown in his social media posts, indicating confusion about the metric.
The creator still uses the feature with subtle thumbnail changes, but results are often equal, and only once did YouTube declare a winner after one day.
The creator urges YouTube to be more transparent and work with small channels to develop features that actually help them grow, as big channels already have advantages.
YouTube's A/B thumbnail testing is flawed because it measures watch time instead of CTR, and it disproportionately benefits large channels with high impressions. The creator calls for YouTube to prioritize small channels and be more transparent about how the feature works.
"The title accurately reflects the content: the creator tested the feature and found significant problems."
What metric does YouTube's thumbnail testing use to determine the winner?
Watch time share (the highest share of a video's watch time).
01:28
Why does the creator argue that watch time is not a good metric for thumbnail testing?
Because watch time depends on video delivery and content, not the thumbnail.
01:57
How long does thumbnail testing typically take for small channels according to the creator?
At least two weeks, often ending with no conclusion.
06:00
What did MrBeast initially think thumbnail testing measured?
Click-through rate (CTR).
07:01
What does the creator suggest YouTube should do to improve thumbnail testing?
Be more transparent and work with small channels to develop features that help them grow.
08:40
YouTube's watch time metric
Reveals that YouTube uses watch time share instead of CTR, which is counterintuitive.
00:22Watch time depends on delivery
Illustrates with an example that the same script can yield different watch times based on presentation.
01:57Small channels disadvantaged
Highlights that thumbnail testing requires large sample sizes, which small channels lack.
05:50Call for transparency
Urges YouTube to prioritize small channels and be more transparent about features.
08:40[00:00] hello hello hello hope you're doing well
[00:02] all right YouTube thumbnail testing or
[00:04] AB testing as some would call it it has
[00:07] been out now for a couple of months and
[00:09] I have had the chance to do some testing
[00:11] in eight of my videos and my honest
[00:14] opinion here is it is good at least
[00:17] initially until I realized that it's
[00:20] horrible the way YouTube implemented
[00:22] this let me start by asking you a simple
[00:25] question what exactly is thumbnail
[00:27] testing to you it is basically comparing
[00:29] two or three thumbnails than checking to
[00:32] see which one has a higher click through
[00:33] itate am I right that was my initial
[00:36] thought and I instinctively think that
[00:38] that is what it is for so when I did my
[00:40] testing I looked at test results see
[00:43] which has the higher percentage then
[00:45] select that as the winner that is how
[00:48] the feature is meant to help I give
[00:50] YouTube Three thumbnails they test it
[00:52] out for me by swapping at random times
[00:55] then run the test for me if you have
[00:57] been using Tu buddies AB thumbnail test
[01:00] that is how it works as well in fact
[01:02] that is what anyone with common sense
[01:05] would think when we say AB testing ask
[01:07] any U iux designer and they will tell
[01:10] you that too but YouTube for whatever
[01:13] reason decided that the thumbnail should
[01:16] measure watch duration instead of Click
[01:18] through rate I mean why how on Earth can
[01:22] a thumbnail decide someone's watch
[01:24] duration so this is what YouTube has to
[01:26] say how is the winning thumbnail
[01:28] selected the winning thumbnail is
[01:30] selected based on the highest share of a
[01:32] video's watch time but why is watchtime
[01:35] share used great thumbnails don't just
[01:38] get viewers to click they also help
[01:40] viewers understand what the video is
[01:42] about so that they can make informed
[01:45] decision of what to watch all right fair
[01:47] enough by selecting based on watchtime
[01:49] share the winning thumbnail is the one
[01:52] that gets viewers to both click and stay
[01:55] to watch now that doesn't make any sense
[01:57] at all people click on a video because
[01:59] the thumbnail or the title made them
[02:01] curious but what makes them stay to
[02:04] watch the video is about the
[02:06] presentation the flow of the video the
[02:09] storytelling the engagement so what I'm
[02:12] seeing here is even if there's a channel
[02:14] out there who is in the same niche as I
[02:17] am who creates similar thumbnails as me
[02:20] who has the same type of information in
[02:23] our videos we may get the same
[02:25] click-through rate but that does not
[02:27] mean we will get the same watch through
[02:30] ation I'll show you imagine if I'm
[02:31] sharing a tip to making more money on
[02:33] YouTube so yeah guys today I made $100
[02:37] on YouTube and what I did is to make
[02:41] sure I create my video then I upload it
[02:44] and then I share it on other social
[02:46] media platforms and when my video gains
[02:50] Traction in other social media platforms
[02:53] they ended up clicking on my chat link
[02:55] and watching my video on YouTube then
[02:58] getting me more views
[03:00] so I made $100 like that extremely dull
[03:04] not much hand gestures no soul no
[03:07] expression whatsoever now compare that
[03:11] to this so today I made $100 on YouTube
[03:14] and I cannot believe what I did actually
[03:17] works what I did is to make sure I
[03:19] create my video then upload that video
[03:22] to YouTube and then I share it to other
[03:25] social media platforms these social
[03:27] media platforms will then get views on
[03:29] their own attracts new audiences for me
[03:32] and get those who are interested to
[03:34] watch my YouTube video via the link I
[03:36] shared and when my video gain Traction
[03:39] in other social media platforms they
[03:41] ended up clicking on my shared link and
[03:43] watching my video on YouTube than
[03:46] getting me more views on YouTube and
[03:48] increasing my revenue for that video it
[03:51] is as simple as that I didn't believe
[03:53] that would work and I hope you can try
[03:55] this out and see the traction as well
[03:57] same message but the watch time varies
[04:00] depending on the delivery right so I
[04:03] honestly don't think YouTube got this
[04:05] right at all the thumbnail has got
[04:07] nothing to do with watch duration even
[04:10] if the Creator nailed the thumbnail and
[04:12] delivered the promised value but YouTube
[04:15] did not end their explanation there they
[04:17] have more to say they state that
[04:19] additionally YouTube's search and
[04:22] Discovery systems consider both when
[04:24] ranking videos choosing thumbnails based
[04:27] on watchtime share will benefit both you
[04:30] and your viewers the way I read that
[04:32] sentence it is just covering up
[04:34] something they don't understand I feel
[04:36] like the team who came up with this
[04:38] feature needs to be content creator
[04:40] themselves hence I don't buy what they
[04:42] say it isn't benefiting me nor my
[04:45] viewers because the metrics are
[04:47] unrelated having said that I do find one
[04:50] very interesting fact about this and
[04:52] that is how YouTube does rank our video
[04:56] this is something that I have had
[04:57] suspicion on for years that's I think
[05:00] that some videos are ranked much like
[05:03] the Google algorithm and I strongly
[05:05] believe that big channels that have
[05:07] created one or more successful videos
[05:10] their channels are ranked secretly so
[05:13] say if I were to create a video of the
[05:15] same topic as Nate black then my video
[05:18] will not get as much impression as his
[05:20] because his channel is ranked higher
[05:22] than mine and therefore the videos he
[05:25] creates will have the advantage of
[05:26] getting ranked higher of course this is
[05:28] just my specul but that particular
[05:31] sentence from YouTube about ranking
[05:33] videos it kind of tells me that it does
[05:36] exist and is hidden from us anyways
[05:38] that's what I found from YouTube
[05:40] thumbnail testing and set to say I
[05:42] didn't even notice it until recently but
[05:45] not only that another big problem with
[05:47] YouTube thumbnail testing is it doesn't
[05:50] benefit small channels in order to have
[05:53] thumbnail testing perform efficiently
[05:55] you actually need a big sample siiz data
[05:58] for example most of my thumbnail testing
[06:00] takes at least two weeks to conclude and
[06:03] often it ends with no conclusion so
[06:06] that's a big waste of time but that's
[06:07] because my sample size is small meaning
[06:10] my videos aren't getting enough
[06:12] impressions for YouTube to do
[06:13] substantial thumbnail testing and who is
[06:16] responsible for giving me more
[06:18] impressions YouTube of course and here's
[06:20] the thing if you're a small Channel and
[06:23] you don't get as many Impressions
[06:25] because your channel isn't ranked yet
[06:28] then this whole thumbnail testing is
[06:31] useless to you your sample size is just
[06:33] too small to make any proper conclusion
[06:35] which is very counterintuitive because I
[06:38] thought thumbnail testing is for small
[06:40] channels but turns out it is really for
[06:42] the big players again I know shocking
[06:46] right I don't know why but when I first
[06:47] heard about thumbnail testing from
[06:49] YouTube from the big content creators
[06:51] out there who got invited to test this
[06:54] feature like Mr Beast I was given the
[06:57] impression that they are to measure
[06:59] click rate and when I look back at what
[07:01] Mr Beast posted when he first started
[07:03] testing this I think even he got
[07:05] confused about what YouTube's AB
[07:08] thumbnail testing is all about the post
[07:11] he made on Twitter or X or whatever he
[07:14] is clearly talking about click through
[07:17] rate and not watch share look that being
[07:20] said I do still use it these days for
[07:23] every video I launch I create three
[07:26] thumbnail versions and I upload them for
[07:28] testing this three thumbnails contain
[07:31] very subtle changes like font color or
[07:34] face expression but that's about it then
[07:38] I will test it out and 99% of the time I
[07:41] will get almost equal percentages which
[07:44] means it doesn't matter which thumbnail
[07:45] I pick they all give similar results
[07:47] there is one time where YouTube gave me
[07:49] a winning thumbnail after testing just
[07:51] one day but that happen only once and I
[07:55] actually don't know why just take a look
[07:57] yourself they're all the same nail I
[08:00] just tilt one and turn another one
[08:02] upside down I guess it does increase
[08:04] click through rate but again I don't see
[08:07] how that will affect watch time unless
[08:10] of course the formula is as simple as
[08:12] taking the clickthrough rate plus the
[08:15] watch time then giving a final score to
[08:18] that thumbnail to determine the winner
[08:20] so that means assuming watch time stays
[08:22] constants because the video style is
[08:24] only capable of doing so much then the
[08:27] deciding factor of a winning thumbnail
[08:29] automatically becomes the click through
[08:32] rate so I guess in a way it is still the
[08:35] click through rate and we're back to the
[08:38] correct way of AB testing look you can
[08:40] see how confusing this is and YouTube
[08:42] needs to be a little more transparent
[08:44] and be straightforward maybe for once
[08:46] stop working with big channels who have
[08:48] the edits advantage and work with small
[08:51] channels who really want to see if new
[08:54] features introduced can indeed help
[08:57] channels grow big channels are all
[08:59] already established they don't need
[09:01] these tools but small channels do so the
[09:04] very least you can do YouTube is to
[09:07] spend those billions of dollars you have
[09:10] to implement a feature that is made
[09:13] specifically for small channels big
[09:15] channels can help sustain YouTube they
[09:17] don't need as much help small channels
[09:20] though if you help us grow our channel
[09:22] to become the next big Channel then that
[09:26] benefits YouTube in the long run because
[09:28] the pool of big channels just gets
[09:31] bigger it's a win-win situation if you
[09:33] ask me
⚡ Saved you time reading this? Transcribe any YouTube video for free — no signup needed.