AI Art Commissions Exposed: Hidden Flaws
45sThe detailed critique of AI art flaws (hair cutting into ears, mismatched earrings) is both educational and controversial, sparking debate about AI vs human art.
▶ Play ClipAI Summary
This video critiques an artist who uses AI-generated images for paid commissions, highlighting the lack of artistic depth and consistency in the work, and the ethical issues surrounding AI art.
Chapters
[00:02]
AI Art Lacks Depth
The creator argues that AI-generated art lacks the depth of human artwork, and advises learning art before criticizing true artists.
[00:15]
Commission Pricing Exposed
The artist charges 50 euros for a basic sketch and 200 euros for a full illustration, but the quality does not justify the price.
[00:29]
Artistic Irregularities
The AI art features obvious flaws: hair cutting into ears, cropped bows, hair blending into clothing, and mismatched details like a drawstring on a hoodless shirt.
[00:43]
Inconsistent Details
At the 100-euro tier, earrings don't match, the character is cross-eyed, and there's crunchy detailing in the hair—signs of AI generation.
[00:58]
More Flaws at Higher Tiers
Even at 150 euros, hair melts into clothing, and an ear floats because the bangs merge into it, showing persistent AI errors.
[01:10]
Background Issues
At 180 euros, the scene includes mismatched floating string lights and framed pictures with garbage content, further indicating AI generation.
[01:22]
Character Inconsistency
The 200-euro complete illustration turns the character into a witch with 'bacteria in the sky,' and the character's hair color and texture change slightly between tiers, making it seem like a different person.
[01:47]
Ethical Concerns Raised
Commenters question whether AI art is stolen art, since AI fuses images from the internet, and whether it's legitimate to sell such work.
[02:00]
Creator's Defensive Response
The artist claims it's 'a lot of work' and that 'it is made by me,' but the creator notes that prompting ChatGPT doesn't equal drawing it yourself.
[02:13]
Value Question
A commenter points out they could get the same result for free in 30 seconds, to which the artist accuses them of stealing—highlighting the absurdity of the pricing.
The video exposes the low quality and ethical problems of selling AI-generated art as commissions, arguing that it lacks the skill and consistency of human-made art.
Study Flashcards (5)
What is the price range for the AI art commissions mentioned?
easy
Click to reveal answer
What is the price range for the AI art commissions mentioned?
easy
Click to reveal answer
From 50 euros for a basic sketch to 200 euros for a full illustration.
00:15
What specific flaw is noted in the basic sketch?
medium
Click to reveal answer
What specific flaw is noted in the basic sketch?
medium
Click to reveal answer
The bangs of the hair cut into the ear, and a bow is cropped off.
00:29
What inconsistency is pointed out in the 100-euro tier?
medium
Click to reveal answer
What inconsistency is pointed out in the 100-euro tier?
medium
Click to reveal answer
The two earrings don't match, and the character is cross-eyed.
00:43
What issue appears in the 150-euro detailed color tier?
medium
Click to reveal answer
What issue appears in the 150-euro detailed color tier?
medium
Click to reveal answer
Hair strands melt into the clothing, and an ear appears floating.
00:58
What is the ethical concern raised about AI art?
hard
Click to reveal answer
What is the ethical concern raised about AI art?
hard
Click to reveal answer
AI takes images from the internet and fuses them, potentially using previous works illegitimately.
01:47
💡 Key Takeaways
💡
AI Art Lacks Depth
Sets the core argument that AI art cannot match human artistic depth.
00:02
📊
Obvious AI Flaws
Concrete examples of AI errors that undermine the quality claim.
00:29
⚖️
Ethical Debate
Raises the critical issue of whether AI art is stolen art.
01:47
💡
Value Question
Highlights the absurdity of charging for something obtainable for free.
02:13Full Transcript
[00:02] better than most of you modern weapons without any real depth. Learn art before trying to criticize an artist who truly understands the full scope of art like me. And so here they posted their commission graphic where it ranges from
[00:15] a basic sketch to a full complete illustration. Their basic sketch goes for 50 euros and their full illustration goes for 200 euros. This person's artwork features a lot of irregularities that you just simply wouldn't find in
[00:29] human artwork. Here we have an example of the basic sketch in which the bangs of the hair actually cut into the ear. There is a bow that is like cropped off, There is a bow that is like cropped off, I think. And then the hair also blends
[00:43] into the clothing and there is one drawstring for a shirt that doesn't have a hood. Now we have the simple color for 100 euros where the two earrings don't match. She is cross-eyed and there are odd crunchy detailing happening in the
[00:58] odd crunchy detailing happening in the hair. For 150 euros you can go and get the detailed color where we again have hair strands that melt into the clothing, more hair strands melting into the clothing, an ear that is floating
[01:10] because the bang is like also melting into the ear. We can have a detailed into the ear. We can have a detailed scene for 180 euros where there are mismatched floating string lights that are like mushed against the wall and
[01:22] framed pictures that have absolute garbage in it. Or for 200 euros get a complete illustration and our character is turned into a witch and there is
[01:34] bacteria in the sky. That's like the best way I can describe it. And she's looks like it's supposed to be the same girl from sketch all the way to complete illustration except it's like not the same character because the hair color
[01:47] and texture changes frame by frame but only just slightly to where maybe it's the same character but like she used a hair curler in this picture. You know buying it in the comment section. I don't want to get into any trouble or
[02:00] stolen art? Knowing the AI takes images and art from the internet to fuse them into a single image, wouldn't that mean the illegitimate use of previous works? want. And OP says, "No, it's a lot of
[02:13] work." Another person says, "200 euros for a product not made by you?" And OP says, "It is made by me." Homie, just because you went into ChatGPT and prompted up an image doesn't mean you actually drew it yourself. So, somebody
[02:25] else took their prompt and then redid it, I guess, in their variation with would I pay you when in 30 seconds I can get the same thing for free?" And then OP says, "Wow, you're clearly stealing from me."
