Could language end thought-crime?
45sThe provocative idea of language controlling thoughts sparks curiosity and debate, perfect for engaging viewers.
▶ Play ClipThis video explores the linguistic relativity hypothesis, often associated with Benjamin Lee Whorf, which suggests that the language you speak can influence or determine how you think. The strong version, linguistic determinism, is largely rejected by linguists and is more common in fiction, while the weak version, linguistic relativism, has some empirical support but is difficult to prove conclusively.
The video opens with a reference to the idea of a government forcing a constructed language to prevent thought-crime, a concept from George Orwell's '1984'.
The strong form of linguistic determinism, which claims language determines thought, is not taken seriously by linguists and is mostly a trope in fiction like the film 'Arrival'.
The weak form, linguistic relativism, suggests language influences thought but is difficult to test and prove. Studies have shown mixed results, such as gendered languages affecting descriptions of objects, but replication has been problematic.
Languages can affect how we perceive sounds, like the difference between aspirated and unaspirated 'p' in English, which native speakers hear automatically but non-native speakers may not.
Language affects how we categorize abstract concepts like emotions. Having more words for emotions helps expression but does not determine the ability to feel them.
The simple answer is no: language does not determine thought. It may make some things easier to explain, but it does not limit cognition or prevent understanding.
The video concludes that while language can influence thought in subtle ways, it does not determine or limit it. The strong version of linguistic determinism is a fictional concept, and the weak version, linguistic relativism, has limited empirical support.
"The title asks a legitimate question and the video provides a nuanced answer, though it leans heavily on debunking the strong version."
What is linguistic determinism?
The strong version claims that language determines thought, but it is not taken seriously by linguists.
00:29
What is linguistic relativism?
The weak version suggests language influences thought but does not determine it.
01:38
Why is linguistic relativism difficult to test?
Studies have shown mixed results and replication issues, and it's hard to separate language from culture.
01:38
Give an example of how language affects perception of sounds.
English distinguishes between aspirated and unaspirated 'p' (platter vs. rhythm), which native speakers hear automatically.
02:47
Does having more words for emotions determine your ability to feel them?
No, it helps expression but does not determine the ability to feel emotions.
03:58
Linguistic determinism is fiction
Debunks a popular trope from '1984' and 'Arrival'.
00:29Linguistic relativism is hard to prove
Highlights the difficulty of separating language from culture in studies.
01:38Language affects sound perception
Provides a concrete example of language influencing automatic perception.
02:47Language influences categorization of abstract concepts
Shows how language shapes categories for emotions but doesn't limit feeling.
03:28[00:00] the government is trying to force Britain, a constructed language that would end "thought-crime". to form ideas that could challenge the ruling Party
[00:15] by taking away the words to think them with. the idea that the language you speak determines how you can think. Because it's… well, it's not really a thing.
[00:29] because it's associated with Benjamin Lee Whorf, They weren't the first, the last, or the loudest linguists to
[00:41] to a hypothesis about it together. and vice versa, but no more than that. linguistic determinism in its strong form,
[00:55] Determinism, the "strong" version, is a popular trope in fiction, Which is where it belongs! The film Arrival made it a major plot point and actually name-checked it.
[01:09] "can actually rewire your brain?" The short story it's based on is much better. Linguistic determinism is not taken very seriously by the linguistics community,
[01:25] Either by attending a Philosophy 101 course, or just thinking about the phrase, "I wish I could find the words to explain how I feel." But the weak form, linguistic relativism, is much more broadly accepted.
[01:38] It is a difficult and messy thing to test for and prove, though. has no word for "privacy", That might be true,
[01:51] but that wouldn't be language limiting the way you think, There have been studies that show things like: are more likely to describe a key as 'jagged', 'rough', and 'hard',
[02:07] would be more likely to use 'golden' or 'intricate'. But when other researchers tried to replicate that study,
[02:19] which is something that keeps happening And besides, it's very difficult to tease apart Even if that result is true, which it's probably not…
[02:33] is the gendered language the cause, or the effect? different languages, not cultures, affect the brain. of the languages we speak.
[02:47] are two different words, platter and rhythm, based on the aspiration, that air that comes out. it's not passed down deliberately to children.
[03:04] your brain will hear it automatically and unconsciously. That's a pretty clear way that languages impact thought.
[03:16] It's not like it's changing your understanding of the world. to affect the categories in your head,
[03:28] particularly for abstract concepts, rather than actual physical things. Emotions do get categorized In English, we can use the same word for two different feelings.
[03:44] do they mean "crying in the corner" Those are both sad But even if a child only knows the word "sad",
[03:58] they've not heard of "despondent' or 'listless' or 'morose' or 'ennui', grieving the devastating loss of their cartoonishly large lollipop Having the different words is really helpful for expressing yourself,
[04:14] but they don't determine your ability to feel emotions. in English those are all basically translated as 'love' to explain all those feelings and emotions,
[04:31] and we can communicate them without knowing Ancient Greek. Until recently, English did not have a word for but we still definitely experienced it
[04:44] So the simple answer to the question is: no. it might make some things easier to explain, bringing down the government by changing their language is,
[05:01] And if you want even more linguistics, my co-author Gretchen McCulloch The link is on screen and in the description.
⚡ Saved you 0h 05m reading this? Transcribe any YouTube video for free — no signup needed.