Is This Drawing Real or AI?
45sThe mystery of whether a drawing is AI-generated sparks curiosity and debate, perfect for engagement.
βΆ Play Clip"The title 'This Is Not A Real Drawing' is a bold claim that the video thoroughly supports with detailed analysis, though it could be shorter."
The video analyzes a drawing shared on social media, questioning its authenticity. The creator examines the artwork's unusual rendering process, color anomalies, and other details to determine if it was made by a human or AI. The community ultimately votes that the drawing is AI-generated.
A drawing of an old woman with large pearls is submitted for review, with the question of whether it's a work in progress or AI-generated.
The drawing appears to be rendered from left to right, with the left side fully detailed and the right side unfinished, which is not a typical human art process.
In the next frame, the right sleeve remains unrendered, and the creator questions why a human would only render two-thirds of a piece.
Despite being a black-and-white pencil sketch, there are faint blue and pink auras in the background, which is unusual for pencil work.
The ear appears to connect into the pearl necklace, and the background shading uses random crisscross scratches rather than proper hatching techniques.
Top comments point out that the scribbling style is a known AI identifier, and the eye appears to look in multiple directions, leading to a community vote of AI.
The drawing exhibits multiple signs of AI generation, including an illogical rendering process, color artifacts, and structural errors. The community consensus is that it is not a real human-made drawing.
What is the main reason the drawing is suspected to be AI-generated?
The rendering process is illogical (left-to-right), there are color auras in a pencil sketch, and structural errors like the ear connecting to the necklace.
01:37
What is a typical human art process for rendering?
Typically, artists do flat shading over the entire piece, then add passes and erase highlights, rather than rendering left to right.
00:40
What did the top comment say about the drawing?
The scribbling shadow style is an identifier of ChatGPT/AI at this point.
02:18
Color Auras in Pencil Sketch
The presence of blue and pink auras in a supposedly black-and-white pencil sketch is a strong indicator of AI generation.
01:37Structural Error: Ear to Necklace
The ear connecting into the pearl necklace is a clear anatomical error that humans are unlikely to make.
02:04AI Scribbling Identifier
The crisscross chicken scratch shading is identified as a common AI artifact, providing a practical detection technique.
02:18[00:03] writes, "From a friend's Instagram, did she really go out of her way to make work in progresses or am I judging the yellow tint too hard?" So, here we have a drawing of an old woman. This looks to be kind of more of a pencil sketch.
[00:15] She's wearing large pearls around her neck and it is a bit of a work in Now, I think this is a bit interesting because like now again, I want to add a disclaimer. Everybody has their own art process. So, some people will draw in
[00:28] one specific way. Other people will draw in a way that works for them. The art process of this one is just a bit odd to me personally because it's kind of like the drawing is split down the middle in terms of a transition. The very left
[00:40] side of the drawing looks to be fully rendered and the more right we go, the less like flushed out the drawing is for some reason. Typically, when people little bit by little bit, you know, they'll do like some flat shading first,
[00:55] over the entire piece, then they'll go another pass through and then erase away highlights. You don't often see people render like left to right with no reason. Now, we have the next frame where it's like that again, but now it's
[01:12] more rendered. Her whole right sleeve is just not flushed in yet. That's a really always say, I always say, you know, when it comes to like is this generated or is this legitimate, is would a human do this? Like why would a human only render
[01:25] two thirds of this piece? And then we have the final piece and the final piece is completely finished and now everything is completely rendered in. The rendering process just literally makes no sense. Now, a couple other
[01:37] things that I notice are odd is that this is supposed to be a black and white pencil sketch, right? I don't know if you guys can see it. Super super faint. It's like an aura of blue and a ring of pink around it. If this is a pencil
[01:50] sketch, why is there green and pink in the background? And the green and pink isn't to add color, but in more so it kind of looks like AI accidentally added whole thing of her ear is somehow connecting into the pearl necklace. This
[02:04] doesn't look human-made at all. And the scratches in the background for the shading for the background, it all is this random like crisscross chicken scratch. It doesn't look like an actual hatching or crosshatching technique that
[02:18] pencil artists would use. Top comment says, "That is so chat GPT. That style of scribbling shadow is an identifier at this point." Various details changed doesn't look like a normal progression. Another user says, "The eye on the left,
[02:31] her right, looks like it's looking in three different directions." Another drawing works. Normally the detail builds up all over. It doesn't sweep in from the left." And I think this being a one-off adds extra context because we
[02:44] know that it's not an artist who just has a history of drawing like this. It's really like her left earring just kind of turns into her necklace. My favorite kind of jewelry." So, the overall community vote is AI.
β‘ Saved you 0h 02m reading this? Transcribe any YouTube video for free β no signup needed.