Thanks to Liquidity I Generated $20,000 This Week! | Smart Money

[00:01] trading strategy that allowed me to withdraw over $20,000 in less than a week. And not only that, but, for example, at

[00:13] but, for example, at Neoma I have the largest withdrawal ever Neoma I have the largest withdrawal ever made, a withdrawal that exceeds $22,000 that I made in the same month with two accounts and the withdrawal from those two accounts totaled

[00:27] more than $2,000. Absolutely amazing . And not only that, but he has accumulated a total of more than $300,000 with all the funding companies. Funding companies like Fanden

[00:42] Next, FTMO, Alfa Capital, funding companies that we all know. Why am I telling you all this? Basically, it's for transparency, so you can see that the person who's going to explain this strategy, the one who's going to explain

[00:57] all these examples, is actually a profitable person. with funding companies and not profitable, but accumulates quite a lot of money in withdrawals from funding companies. I'm tired of seeing so many pseudo-mentors or gurus

[01:14] explaining their strategy or saying that others aren't valid when they do n't actually demonstrate any payout or any payments from funding companies. Let's be honest, nowadays everyone operates with funding companies, and with good

[01:28] reason, because funding companies give us a huge capacity to withdraw large amounts of money with very little risk. use them, you have to be profitable, and above all, you have to

[01:44] be profitable, and above all, you have to be profitable in order to explain or mentor people, because if you don't withdraw from funding companies, how are you going to teach someone else to withdraw from funding companies? And after speaking all these

[01:56] truths, let's get to the video. Something I'd like to explain before we start with the strategy is basically what funding companies are, or rather, what

[02:08] funding companies are not. Because nowadays, there is a lot of misinformation or misexplaining about all this funding companies. What you need to keep in mind if you want to be profitable with funding companies is that it's not the same thing.

[02:23] accounts funded with personal capital. For quite some time now, many people have been saying that you should trade with 0.5%, 0.20%, 0.7%, or

[02:35] 0.5%, 0.20%, 0.7%, or 1% per risk per trade, and treat your challenge or your funded account as if it were personal capital or as if you were managing it in banking institutions or had to

[02:47] answer to someone. This is a very common mistake, and that's why the vast majority of people spend a lot of time on phase one, phase two, stuck in a challenge. Why does this happen? Basically because all of this is not explained well

[03:01] and because it is not understood how funding companies actually work. Despite what those well-known funding company podcasts tell you— that you shouldn't treat your challenge

[03:16] like an investor, or that you have to manage your account very, very carefully because otherwise we'll ban you for taking too much risk, etc.—right? They try to scare you, they try to tell you that risking

[03:29] more than 0.5% is more than an act of madness, that this is unthinkable do is scare you. So that? Basically, they want to constantly take your money and prevent you from taking money from them. Well, despite

[03:44] all this, despite all the propaganda about 'hey, don't overtrade, don't trade with more risk than 0.5% in your challenge or in your funding account,' this challenge or in your funding account,' this is not the case. Many people become obsessed with

[03:58] passing a 100k account, a 200k account, and because they are afraid of losing their investment, of losing their money that they have worked so hard to earn, of course, they take a year or 6 months to pass a phase one. Well, let me tell you

[04:12] that despite everything they say out there , I'm here to break your paradigms. , I'm here to break your paradigms. Taking more than a month or two to complete a phase one challenge is a waste of time. A waste of time and

[04:24] money. Keep in mind that if you were to dedicate the time you're spending on this challenge to any other job, whether it's working else, it would be much more profitable. You have to keep

[04:37] in mind that the time you dedicate to that account, that challenge or to that phase two, has to have an economic return. If you take 6 months and don't submit the account, therefore you don't make money because you are

[04:51] operating fictitiously, so to speak, in a phase one, a phase two, your time is worth zero. And this, as you will understand, is neither optimal nor ? So you buy your little account of $400, or $200, and stay there

[05:06] permanently until one day you lose it and buy it again, spend a few more months there, and earn money from your money as if it were a monthly deposit. In other a month, crashes it, uses it for another month, crashes it, and I don't want him to cause me any

[05:19] problems. Well, obviously everything they tell you on social media and everything they tell you on social media and everything they promote on these types of company accounts for crowdfunding and podcasting, what they want is for you not to harm

[05:31] a funding company works. A funding company makes money when traders lose. Therefore, they are not interested in you trading more than 1.5% or 2% because you could harm them. But as always, when someone tells you something, do the

[05:45] trading. My trading strategy is based on the exact opposite of what the Buy when it surpasses a high and sell when it breaks a low. What do the vast majority do? lose money. More than 80-85% of people lose

[06:01] I do? Quite the opposite. When it breaks I sell. Well, it's the same in the funding company . If every CEO, every funding company, every funding podcast tells you to risk 0.5,

[06:16] 0.20 and treat your account like you 're an investor, do the opposite. obviously you're not going to risk 3%, obviously you're not going to risk 2%, but believe me, 3%, 5%, or 0.7% isn't going to get you anywhere. Well, yes, to waste your

[06:30] money and your time. That's why you need to understand very well how funding companies work, how funding accounts work, and how to make money with funding accounts. In summary, funding accounts are not the

[06:44] same as personal capital. Get that into your head really well because otherwise you 'll never be profitable. I'm also going to give you a couple of tips that made me profitable. The first, and I think one of the most important, is not to spend all

[06:59] day looking at the graph. Today, with our mobile phones, computers, televisions, laptops, from anywhere, we can be viewing TradingView, we can be viewing Metatrader, we can be viewing our

[07:12] trades, our analysis, all with the click of a phone in a couple of seconds. What is going to lead to this? Basically, it's about over-operating. If you spend a lot of time looking at

[07:26] goes up, when it goes down, when to enter, when not to enter, outside of trading hours, all this will cause you to place a not to enter, outside of trading hours, all this will cause you to place a a lot of them. Because? Because it's not within a specific time frame, not

[07:40] within a time zone where there is greater volatility and greater opportunities, it's very likely that many of those trades will go to stop loss. You have to keep in mind that most price movements that take you

[07:54] in the right direction usually happen during the opening of the stock market, whether it's the London Stock Exchange or the New York Stock Exchange. If it's not within those hours, you might make a good trade and win a few trades, but in

[08:08] the long run you'll lose. Because? Well, because these expansive and correct market movements tend to occur at these times and make sense, because it is during these hours that most negative news occurs

[08:21] , where the price begins to wake up, begins to move, begins to create that strong movement, and also where those banking transactions of the interbank algorithm begin to be generated, both sent and

[08:35] received. Therefore, the price starts to move and begins to create that volatility and movement, that momentum that we need to trade. Outside of these hours we may have some trades, we may get some right,

[08:47] some trades, we may get some right, but in the long run we will fail 90% of the time. Also, of course, we have a component where we get into trading for freedom, and if we do n't spend all day looking at the

[08:59] trade, the trade running, then we take freedom out of the equation. that we need to have specific times and timeframes, specific time zones to view the chart, both to improve our profitability,

[09:14] to have better entries, and also to have freedom. The second piece of advice I to have freedom. The second piece of advice I give you is also not to jump from strategy to strategy. A very common mistake in this business, in trading, is

[09:29] jumping from strategy to strategy. Why is this being done? Well, because we don't accept losses. Every trading strategy, every way of operating, has bad streaks and good streaks. Obviously, the good streaks have to

[09:42] outweigh the bad streaks. Why do strategies change so often, especially among beginners? Because losses are not accepted, and it is not accepted that someone might have a bad day, two

[09:56] bad days, or three bad days, which is more than possible. Obviously, over time, those days, those negative streaks, will have to become less frequent and the winning streaks will continue to increase, but the

[10:11] bad streaks will come and they will be there, so if you go from strategy to strategy you will never really learn, you will never be profitable and you will always be pivoting from strategy to strategy. And this won't do you

[10:24] any good because you'll never know how to operate correctly with a strategy, and that way you'll never be profitable. I believe this is consistency. I think this is something very basic to understand, but especially at the

[10:37] beginning, it's very difficult for us to grasp: that we have to stick with one strategy and one mentor. If that mentor is good, teaches well, and their strategy is correct, stick with them. Keep that one for a year, or even two years.

[10:51] Refine that strategy, achieve results with that strategy, and stick with that strategy and the person who explains it. Don't jump from mentor to mentor, will do is make you lose money and waste your time,

[11:05] and you'll never be profitable. And I'll also take this opportunity to explain which mentor and strategies to choose , because I know that at the beginning, with so much information and so many mentors or pseudo-mentors explaining their

[11:18] strategy or way of operating, it can confuse you and make you switch from one strategy to another or from mentor to mentor. The first thing you should do is see if that mentor has results. Nowadays, with

[11:32] funding companies, we all operate with funding accounts, so it's very easy to see if that person is getting results or not. If you go on their social media, their Instagram, their YouTube, or wherever you've seen them, and you don't see that they have

[11:44] certified payouts with recognized funding companies, or you see that they never show results, that they don't show certificates, that they don't show do that kind of thing, then start to doubt because nowadays it's very easy to

[11:59] payouts, and it's simply by being profitable. I have dozens and dozens and dozens, probably even hundreds, of payout certificates, and that's why I'm so insistent about showing it. I know that many people say, "No, it's just that

[12:13] you have too much ego, you're too arrogant." No, simply put, if I'm exposing myself to teaching, mentoring, training, and sharing my strategy publicly, I also have to publicly disclose the

[12:25] n't know if my information is valid or you should do is verify if that person is actually withdrawing, if they have person is actually withdrawing, if they have

[12:38] one in January 2019 and to see if his strategy is valid and above all if that person is qualified to help, to mentor, to train other give you is not to hire a 15- year-old kid, okay? I've been

[12:52] social media, especially on TikTok: people who live at their parents' house, people who don't even have beards yet, and are teaching others how to start businesses and how to make beard and you live at your parents' house in the next room, you won't be

[13:06] able to teach me much about making money. And I think that with these two tips you'll get rid of 80 to 90% of the people who are really not profitable. Obviously there will be other people who make it more difficult, but with these two tips I

[13:20] 'm going to get a lot of people off your back. Of course, everyone who tells you, everyone who explains it to you, you have to backtest it, backtest it on TradingView, backtest it on whatever platform you want and see if it

[13:32] results with it, well, keep studying, keep studying, keep studying and give it a chance. But if you see that what he's explaining does win a trade in months, then obviously stop trading. With these

[13:46] tips you'll get rid of a lot of pseudo-mentors who are practically worthless. Now, let's look at a couple of examples of the strategy so you can see how simple and easy it is, and all it takes is watching the market for 2 or 2.5

[13:59] hours a day. What is my strategy based on? Basically, it's about doing the exact opposite of what most people do. As I mentioned before, the vast majority of people tend to sell when the price breaks a low

[14:13] because they believe it has confirmed that change in structure, that bearish movement, and they tend to sell. What else do people usually do? Well, when it breaks a record high, it usually buys. Well , I do just the

[14:25] opposite. When the price breaks a high, I sell. When the price breaks a low, I buy. There are more important maximums and minimums . Of course, a minimum maximum in an H4 or daily or weekly maximum is not the same as a maximum of

[14:40] 5 minutes. Even so, I encourage you to do backtesting and you'll see how the price tends to react even to 5-minute highs and lows structural change that most people usually explain is this. The price that

[14:55] people usually explain is this. The price that reaches a high, breaks this previous high, would create this low that has created this impulse and would begin that decline. OK? What does price do?

[15:09] when it breaks a high, it goes back. And when it breaks a low, it pulls back, looking for our entry, right? This is what everyone tells us. He tells us, "Listen, when it makes a structural change, the price breaks the point and

[15:23] the pullback begins." Well, this would be my way of operating. What's really happening is that people are looking for a continuation of the sell-off here, when what I sell-off here and a buy-off here when it has broken the low or broken the high.

[15:37] n't be able to get much out of it because the pullback from the low to the area where we want to look for continuation might be 2 pips. But when it 's an H1 or H4 point, which might be a

[15:52] 60-pip retracement, then obviously we can take advantage because my can take advantage because my stop loss usually goes between 3 and 7 or 8 pips. So we have a movement where we can get a good

[16:05] piece of the pie. What would we have here? And well, this would be the point, the maximum of the previous day, our PDH, previous Daily High. I have this explained in other videos on YouTube. And what we must do here is wait for

[16:19] opening of the London Stock Exchange or at the opening of the New York Stock Exchange. Once the price clears, well, you can already see what that absurd pullback is doing, okay? We would go to a temporality

[16:34] that we like in a larger timeframe. I normally wait for my trades, my entry executions, on M1 to M5. We would go to a time frame of 1 minute. I usually set my entrances to be from 1 minute to 5 minutes and see which

[16:50] stage I like best, whether it's M1, M2, M3, or M5, okay? But my entries, my executions usually fall within those time frames from M1 to M5. Because? Because the RR, the risk-benefit ratio, is considerably higher, okay?

[17:04] However, if I go to an entry type of M15, M30, then my SL will be 20 pips, the movement 40, the movement 35 and I'm not going to get the money I want. Well, once the price reaches that point, notice the time it

[17:17] does, 9:02 in the morning, right at the opening, that is, in London, it starts to retrace our steps, okay? Um, something I usually take into account is imbalances, okay? I tend to pay close attention to imbalances. I have several

[17:30] for example, is the change in structure, which I have also mentioned on several occasions, that for me, the change in structure would be here, since it is the last pullback before the big push. Therefore, we should look for some

[17:42] price has respected the first imbalance. Here we see that the second imbalance has been respected, okay? And what we can do here is enter quite risky, or the second

[17:56] second imbalance would be much better, since the first one is created with very little momentum, without a change in structure, and practically without anything. and created the second, we could perfectly well insert

[18:09] our entry here. We could put our SL above the maximum. Here too we must take into account our broker, our funding company, depending on the spread, the sleep page it has. If it has a good spread, simply

[18:22] give it half a pip more at the maximum in case it decides to raise it more or act a bit any kind of thing like this. Okay, this would be a possible entry point, look for it in M1. It's quite risky. I like to operate on a

[18:37] slightly longer timeframe, although there we see that the price does not respect it and at no break the high. Notice that if we had set the SL above the maximum, it wouldn't have kicked us out . Okay, even so, this post, as I

[18:49] said, is risky. We can go to a timeframe, for example, M3, okay? to a timeframe, for example, M3, okay? M3. Here we see that we would not have entered this entry and we see in M3 that it creates another imbalance. Well, listen,

[19:02] we can perfectly fit our ticket here and we're covered by this maximum up here . What are we looking for? So, the next low that the price has created for us, okay? Which one would it be? Okay, this is the minimum here? Here's where

[19:14] little more because normally the price doesn't usually hit and shoot up, but rather, it usually goes a little deeper and then goes, the TP, because sometimes it does give that little kiss and leaves, well, what we

[19:28] can do is put the TP here and we'll avoid problems, okay? This would have been the entrance, for example, in M3, okay? That's where the imbalance would come in. gives us the TP. Here you can see how the price

[19:40] not only stops at that minimum point, but finally gives a slightly longer kiss, right?, than expected. And it would go from 1 to 253 and even to 13.18. This would be a very, very clean entry at the

[19:56] opening of the London Stock Exchange. That would be a classic textbook entry for my trading strategy. The price breaks a high and begins to fall. Where do I exit? So, what's the next liquidity point? Well, that minimum, that

[20:11] one-hour point that the price has created for me. Okay? I usually look at the maximums and minimums, from monthly, weekly, daily, 4 hours and one , especially for beginners. I sometimes

[20:23] do it when I see it very clearly, but if you are a beginner and you don't yet know how to don't recommend lowering the time frame by one hour, it's not necessary. And now let's look at the possible purchase he made. You are, therefore, on New York time.

[20:37] We see how the price reached this point, it made a retracement. You're already late, so I wouldn't look for this purchase, okay? And the price settles. New York's opening. Here it is mitigating this imbalance, but not only

[20:50] that, it has broken the low of the London session, something very very important that we can observe it breaking. Look, at 2:40 PM, no less. Minimum cash. We are in our trading session,

[21:05] in our New York session, and here we would be looking for our possible obviously causes a structural change, and we could go from M1 to

[21:17] M5, okay? From M1 to M5 we can search for our trades, our entries, our operations. Well, here we see how to do the walking in M1. We have several imbalances and some of you ask me a lot, "Hey,

[21:30] Benjamin, why is one imbalance good and another not?" When there are several, what do I do? Well, this can happen sometimes . When the price has several imbalances, I'm not a fortune teller, I'm not a magician, okay? I don't know what imbalance will be

[21:43] you can react to this imbalance, this imbalance, or this imbalance, or do there? Well, what you can do is simply place the imbalance where it is closest to the price, which would be here. Okay, we see that there is

[21:57] an imbalance there. Well, we put our purchase in there and that's it. Okay, to what extent should we be objective? Well, on to the next H1 peak, which for me would be this one. Or we'd leave now, okay? Would it be this one here or would we go to the

[22:10] external one that is giving us a much higher RR? Okay, this would be in the M1 time frame. Ta ta ta ta taata. That's where it comes in. Boom, boom, boom. He acts quite foolish. Many of you probably get overwhelmed and set break even, but what

[22:23] quite a while acting foolishly until finally, boom, it shoots up. This afraid, then obviously you're going to miss out on trades like these. This would be in the M1 time frame, but it has also entered in the M3 time frame. Notice,

[22:37] cover ourselves at the bottom and it gives us a much higher RR. 1 to 3.36 the one up here, plus 1.5 up here, okay? An RR of 1, 3 and a bit,

[22:49] 3 and 5, and the one above, the external one, would be giving us that RR of 1 to 5. price. He's been acting like a fool for quite some time now. Well, he would have already given us the first RR

[23:01] . Look. Boom, boom, boom. A 3.4. And if we had let the trade run, it would have given us that TP, right? Let's see it right now , that 1 to 5 RR TP that would have given us. All within the

[23:15] London session and the New York session without needing to look at the chart for many hours, dedicating 2 hours in the morning to the London session and 2 and a half hours to the

[23:27] New York session. Something very simple and objective to look at this trading strategy. And by the way, I don't mention it much on the YouTube channel, to be honest, but just so you know, with Neoma, the Funding company, you have a

[23:41] 30% discount code on all products, that is, on all the funding accounts you want. If you use the discount code belique, exactly as you have it here, for example, a $10,000 account will cost you

[23:55] 69.30. For example, a $100,000 account with the code Belique, which gives you a 30% discount, will cost you $ gives you a 30% discount, will cost you $ 349.30

[24:11] pretty good spread, pretty good commissions, and to this day I funding company, but anyway, if you want to take a look, you can, and if you want to buy an account and try it out, with the code BI you get a 30%

[24:26] discount on all products. Very few people have this discount code ; as you can see here, they usually offer 20% off, but with the code velic you get 30%, so if you see it, take advantage of it. We

[24:40] I hope you liked all the advice I gave you, those tips that helped me withdraw all that money I've mentioned to you so many times. I'm sorry if I'm sometimes annoying showing those payouts, but I think it's

[24:53] Because? Basically, because all the pseudo-mentors and gurus, all if people like me, and Spanish speakers, keep

[25:05] sharing all the retreats. This will force gurus and fake mentors, those who aren't profitable, to get their act together or come up with other excuses, because if people consistently show their withdrawals and

[25:17] payouts, people will ask for them, and this will cause many fraudsters to leave the industry. And believe me, we need a lot more fakers out of the industry. That's why I'm so insistent on showing the

[25:29] 're not wasting your time on my channel, like on many other channels. Here you are learning from someone who really knows what he's doing and is showing it to you. Hey, I've withdrawn over $300,000 in payouts with funding companies.

[25:42] I'll know something and I'll explain something positive to you here. So I hope you enjoyed the video, please leave a comment and share it if you feel like it , because this helps the YouTube algorithm. And we'll see you in the next

[25:55] YouTube algorithm. And we'll see you in the next video.