This ETF Fee Could Cost You $479,000
42sThe shocking cost difference between two identical S&P 500 funds grabs attention and makes investors think about hidden fees.
βΆ Play Clip"Delivers exactly what the title promises with a clear, impactful example, though it's brief and lacks depth."
This video explains the significant impact of expense ratios on investment returns, using a comparison between a low-cost S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and a high-cost Rydex S&P 500 Class C fund. It demonstrates how a seemingly small difference in fees can drastically reduce long-term wealth, emphasizing the importance of checking expense ratios before investing.
VOO, a popular S&P 500 ETF, charges a 0.03% expense ratio ($3 per $10,000 annually). The Rydex S&P 500 Class C fund tracks the same index but charges 2.36%, which is 78 times more for the identical thing.
Investing $100,000 in each fund with 8% annual returns for 30 years: VOO grows to $1,000,000, while Rydex ends at $519,000. The 2.36% fee effectively halves your money because it compounds over time.
The Rydex fund is a Class C share, often sold by brokers, and holds over $11 million in assets, indicating that people are buying it despite the high fees. The video advises checking expense ratios before investing.
Expense ratios are a critical factor in investment returns; even small differences can compound into massive losses over time. Always compare fees before choosing a fund.
What is the expense ratio of VOO?
0.03%
00:15
What is the expense ratio of the Rydex S&P 500 Class C fund?
2.36%
00:30
How much more does the Rydex fund charge compared to VOO?
78 times more
00:30
If you invest $100,000 in each fund with 8% returns for 30 years, what is the final value of VOO?
$1,000,000
00:44
If you invest $100,000 in each fund with 8% returns for 30 years, what is the final value of the Rydex fund?
$519,000
00:44
78x fee difference
Illustrates the extreme disparity in fees for identical index tracking.
00:30High fees halve returns
Demonstrates the devastating compounding effect of fees over long periods.
00:44[00:03] also an S&P 500 fund, but this second one, the Rydex one, is a rip-off and one, the Rydex one, is a rip-off and it's going to cost you $479,000, but why? VOO, the first one, is a popular S&P 500 ETF and it charges you
[00:15] an expense ratio or a yearly fee of 0.03%. That means for every $10,000 you put into VOO, you pay $3 in fees on an annual basis. The Rydex S&P 500 Class C fund, it also tracks the S&P 500, so
[00:30] same companies, same weights, but it charges a 2.36% expense ratio. That's 78 times more for the identical thing. If you put 100k in each fund with the same 8% market returns for 30 years, with VOO, you're
[00:44] dollars, but with Rydex, you're going to end up with 519,000. That 2.36% fee basically took half of your money because it takes the fee and everything that the fee would have earned every year for 30 years. Now, I
[00:58] know this is an extreme example, but you can even see that active ETFs will that's something you need to consider when investing. Here's a table of fees be shooting for if you want to screenshot it. As to why anyone would
[01:12] ever invest in the Rydex fund, well, it is a Class C share, so it might be sold by brokers. It holds over 11 million dollars in assets, so people are buying and check your expense ratios before investing.
β‘ Saved you 0h 01m reading this? Transcribe any YouTube video for free β no signup needed.