Trading $1000 to $50,000 Apartment: Weekly Trade Breakdown (Ep.4)

[00:02] Today we have the fourth part on accelerating a deposit from $1,000 to an apartment. apartment with only $1,000 by trading cryptocurrency futures. So, if you're interested in this topic, be sure to

[00:17] like it and subscribe to the channel if you have n't already. And if you don't like the video , remove the like at the end, write negative comments, and unsubscribe from the channel. In short, you know everything yourself what needs to be done. We are not

[00:30] taking up either my time or yours right now. Let's move on to analyzing the transactions. The first thing we need to do is show that this is our story. Please watch. If you haven't seen the first three parts, be sure to watch them, then move on to this

[00:42] video. And you need to understand that when you're breaking down $1,000, for me $1,000 isn't that much money. Therefore, at some point I can take risks, at some point I can be more careful with risks, and when we reach a

[00:55] more or less normal amount, say, 10-20,000 dollars, of course, if we reach that, 10-20,000 dollars, of course, if we reach that, then we will definitely need to reduce the risks, do something about it, think about something, do everything somehow more

[01:08] competently, so that we do n’t have any questions or problems there. Therefore, while our deposit is small, we will end the risk. As soon as the deposit grows, we will gradually reduce the risks and move on to more

[01:20] conservative trading. I'll tell you right away that I don't recommend trading like that, accelerating like that 100%, because, well, if $1,000 is your last money, you'll most likely lose it. I have to

[01:32] say this at the very beginning because you're going to watch it now. Uh, I know negative, but just so you understand that if you end up taking risks, sooner or later you'll get wiped out on futures. Therefore, we will not use this video as

[01:46] instructions, but simply look at what I traded, what worked best, and everyone will draw their own conclusions. Well, now I suggest we start with the loss tops. Let's look at the biggest losses I had, but then we'll

[02:00] move on to the most profitable trades I had this week. Sorry to interrupt your viewing of this video, but in 3 minutes of your time you can earn $45. 45 bucks. Here is the QR code. Or follow the

[02:16] link in the description to the Telegram channel. There are five steps, really five steps, which can be completed in 3 minutes. And in 3 minutes, $45 can be yours. So good luck. In first place we have a loss on the

[02:31] peace instrument. As you can see, right now our glass even shows a profit of $1,300. If you think about it, this deal was opened on September 27th, then I’ve already made a pretty good profit, roughly speaking. So, the $1,200 deposit is

[02:47] burning, the entry point is ideal. But why is this loss making deal in the first place? Everything is banal and simple. Here we have a level of support. As you can see, there were several levels here. Some levels were boarded up.

[03:03] tilt. Our instrument has worked more than once due to this tilt. Lately, the coins that are listed on the Binance exchange immediately fall, then they can fall a little more, and then suddenly they make 5-10x in a day

[03:19] and then disappear. In short, initially I tried to lift this coin from the tilt somewhere, but from the tilt, perhaps there was some minor loss, since it is somehow not displayed here. As a result,

[03:31] my second entry point was from the support level. We have pinned this level of support . I decided that when I return to this very range, I will try to go long, because there are a lot of levels here. There are highs that can be

[03:45] removed, there are some local levels, and there are also levels here. And if you draw all this like this, you get such a beautiful, chic triangle. In fact, I was waiting to go up. This was such a decisive point, whether I should go out or not

[03:59] . For some reason I thought that we would have a breakout now, they would start to withdraw liquidity behind these, these highs. In short, I imagined in my head that I would be able to increase my deposit very easily. I thought that with one deal I would immediately

[04:11] close several X's there. I ended up with closed at a loss. Plus, this deal was closed quite late, because it would have been possible to

[04:24] easily close the deal at breakeven, but, as you can see, I personally did not do this. I didn't do it because lately I haven't been setting stops because I've become a bit paranoid. You put a stop, and

[04:39] you get knocked out. Although here I went out for a bit to do some business in the toilet. By the time I got back from the toilet, damn it, everything had already broken through. And, in short, I had to close it right where I saw it. Therefore, the loss here should have been greater than usual, it should have been

[04:53] a break-even, although initially there should have been a plus, because the volume here was good, and, in principle, it was possible to take 1,500 and, roughly speaking, lose the deposit. I personally did not do this. I simply closed it where it had already been necessary

[05:08] arrived. And in the end, this deal brought me a loss of 819 dollars. Yes, I think I had a deposit there of about 1,500-1,600 dollars, yes, and here or there 1,400, and here in one transaction I give away almost half of the deposit

[05:24] . The deposit acceleration situation is unpleasant , downright unpleasant. Roughly speaking, I just came from nature, but, unfortunately, this is our deal. The next losing trade was opened on the Alpin instrument. I personally don't remember

[05:40] why there is such a large volume here, but I can assume that I combined the transactions here . Because it all looks like there are several entries for this instrument. All this happened more or less at the same time. All this happened at night, but you can

[05:54] more or less understand what I expected here. This tool has been heavily pumped up. He was on local highs. After that they started to drain it. And here in the trading I simply hammered and hammered into short just to

[06:09] continue, so to speak, a drain. However, this drain did not happen to us. The instrument has paid off sharply here. Personally, I probably had to leave Unfortunately, I don’t have a recording for this whole thing. Apparently, I was trying to short

[06:24] or long something here. And, in short, in the end, it’s clear that neither one nor the other worked. And in total, I gave away another 800 bucks on these deals. That is, here we have a level, here I am trying to gain it. We see that we

[06:39] also had a level here, it was broken through well. and I thought that now we’ll negotiate and then go and break through again. But the instrument was suddenly bought out, I leave. I'm still trying to do something here, but nothing works. And as a result, the deal brings a total loss

[06:53] of $800. The next losing trade was also opened on the Alpin instrument -44 dollars. Here the volume is already, I would say, an adequate risk. Yes, it is overvalued relative to the deposit. Later

[07:08] we will simply look at the chronology of these transactions. So that you understand, now you may be wondering how it was possible to lose 400-800 dollars there and then blow up your deposit. You should have already lost everything from at least these three deals.

[07:21] But there are also positive deals that we will look at together. Therefore, apparently, there were positive ones, after which it was possible to distribute. In principle, there is nothing to explain about Alpin here. A fairly typical situation, the same as the previous one.

[07:36] We have this downward trend. This is such a gorgeous, beautiful tilt, such a compression to the levels. We also need to remember that the instrument there has sharply increased from one dollar to 6-7 bucks. And here he

[07:51] becomes a trader. Just beautiful barks. I come in front of these levels, I stand here, I stand, there is no movement, it unfolds. I'm already exiting and taking the loss. In principle, there is nothing to worry about, I would say it is a

[08:04] technical stop, not all levels are broken, somewhere they reverse, as you can see. Then they split it and sawed it. And then I also have this last deal, here was the cabin collapse. Therefore, in principle, there are two such

[08:18] unpleasant losses on Alpina. The next losing trade was made on Ether. Here we have a local timeframe - a five-minute chart. We have this level of support, this level of support and this one.

[08:33] Basically, I wanted to enter on a breakout of these levels, I clicked before the levels, there was no movement, I immediately exited. No waiting around or anything like that. The movement simply didn't take off. As you can see, yes, it went further. But,

[08:49] apparently, I did not participate in this movement, although, perhaps, I did, I don’t remember. We'll see about this later. In short, nothing unusual. There are some very cool levels. Uh, for some reason these levels didn't

[09:01] work out for us the first time, so there's nothing to explain here. The most common standard loss is -416 dollars, loaded normally. I paid 2011 bucks as a commission. Remember, you can save at least 20-30-40% of what you save on trading commissions and

[09:15] get back. All this is possible via the links in the description. Then I'll show you how much I was able to save in this one week. The next losing trade was next losing trade was on the Hi-Fi instrument. It was -$378 here

[09:28] pretty basic stop, so you understand that when I increase my deposit, say, $1,000, I can set myself a risk of up to 10% per trade. It’s even possible that it could be more somewhere, if I’m absolutely

[09:43] sure of the situation there. But you need to understand that even if I lose $1,000 , no matter what, I can still make another deposit and try again. If it were already 10-20,000 dollars, well then, yes, it would be

[09:57] painful. I would no longer be able to take such a big risk on one deal. Although, well, it’s just that why is this happening? Because I was already used to trading with normal volumes, getting stops of three, five, and

[10:10] 10,000 dollars. I'm already used to doing this. Therefore, roughly speaking, I could afford to take risks here, because, again, let me remind you, I was increasing the deposit. There's nothing unusual here. The deal, again , is the most typical one, simply to continue the

[10:26] movement. Hi-Fi instrument. He was pumped very actively. As you can see, here we have this kind of hiok. We are breaking through this level, yes, it’s not pretty. After such a bargaining. Here we begin to retest this level. I'm

[10:42] trying to get in somehow to take over the continuation. Roughly speaking, I get hit by cars. This is the first time I've come here, they performed. This is the second time I'm coming, they've stopped me. In short, I spat, thinking, screw it. As you can see, the instrument was then pumped

[10:55] and then eventually dumped. This is how crypto has been going lately: they pump, pump, pump, and then dump everything in an hour . That is, you went to the toilet, and by the time you arrived the whole market was already jammed. So it's a very ordinary stop, nothing

[11:09] special. -378 bucks. The next major loss was incurred on the XPL instrument. We discussed this loss in the previous part. There is, in principle, nothing much to analyze here. The instrument simply grows. There are levels

[11:24] above, there is local prohvostok. I expected to see an upward exit. The movement didn't go, I went out. Although, as far as I remember, XPL grew quite well, although, well, not by much. In short, I expected to see a continuation, but the continuation

[11:38] only happened somewhere around here. That is, he gained strength early, in principle, he stopped, well done. Lost $285 here . You can watch this deal in previous episodes on this topic. The next loss was

[11:50] incurred on the Avo instrument. As you can see, this is the glass you need to look into. Here we have active growth of the instrument. The instrument is adjusted slightly and moves on. is adjusted slightly. Here too it

[12:04] goes further. In short, it's just a pump. Here is a correction, pump, correction, pump. I think the correction is, accordingly, a pump. Plus there are these local levels. It seems like I can hide behind these levels, so I go in. How much do they draw at the moment

[12:20] ? 220-230. Already a lot of dollars. I'm thinking about where I will fix my position. But I didn't get to enjoy this position for long. As you can see, my instrument is already starting to roll out, and as a result, this

[12:33] transaction was closed at the stop with one big rollover. big rollover. They took $253 from me in money. In principle, the most common technical loss. As you can see, everyone spoke up and moved on as

[12:48] usual. Everything is classic, everything is basic. If there were regular standard corrections here, everything would be clearly unscrewed, but here we have a correction after which it did not unscrew. Therefore, the loss is standard, nothing

[13:02] out of the ordinary. Minus $253. The next loss was also incurred on the next loss was also incurred on the Aevo instrument. Well, in short, this was the first attempt to take this very movement. You see, I was drowned for the first time

[13:15] . Then I decided to move beyond this level, because we did n’t break through it, we didn’t pin it. turned around. After the reversal, I poked, this is the previous deal, and it didn’t work either. In short, minus 200 dollars here,

[13:28] minus 200 dollars there. I paid 400 bucks for two attempts. The next random loss was on the Alpin instrument for $167. I can't even explain anything at all. The deal is not mine, I didn’t open it. Someone

[13:41] got into my computer, someone clicked on something. But if, in short, we look into it, it seems to me that I did see a level of support here. this one, which we have, and the dream that we have. And I also saw that from this level

[13:56] we start to have some kind of reaction and from this level I click on longs. The volume here is also, in principle, normal. The movement seemed to have started, it seemed like they even painted green paint on, by the way, they painted green paint on about 200 or 500 dollars, but in

[14:12] the end it was just, apparently, one print, well, yes, someone just took it and printed it. Well, just one second, you see, someone just threw a one-second chart , Maxim closed and the movement continued . In short, I was unlucky, unlucky. By

[14:26] the way, this clearly shows you why it is important to record your transactions. It seems like I don’t remember a damn thing, but then, bam, I’m measuring something with a ruler. That is, I come in and expect to see the demolition of all levels. Here I am already sitting in a glass, enjoying myself,

[14:39] going crazy. Again, it clearly shows $550. That's it, the position is closed. That's how it happens in crypto. You sit and sit, they draw you again and boom, the position is

[14:51] closed. This is the kind of loss. The next trade closed at - $159. Again, the Alpine tool. How much was the loss on this Alpine? This is the main thing. I stopped there, stopped there. By the way, do you see the

[15:05] funny thing? If one instrument doesn't work , then there's no point in going into it, apart. I've had it fall apart so many times, it fell apart here, it fell apart there. How much money has already been spent on just one Alpina instrument . The next

[15:18] significant loss for this run was on the Ae instrument. Here we have a situation where it is clear that our instrument has failed, while it has been growing very well. Damn, so it's the same Aeva again, damn. Yeah, darn it. It

[15:33] turns out that I was slogging here, the tool knocked me out, I updated it, and I think he still got it and will go now. And they still knock me out here. Damn, but in the end he still turned around. So what, should I just sit and

[15:46] trade without top-level users? In no case. You can't trade without tops. In short, that's it, they're stopping me here. All this was stopped. Ah, although I came out myself. I already realized that there is nothing to catch here. I think we need to go out. And in the end I got out here. I would have been

[16:00] turned off anyway. Minus $106. Well , let's probably also look at the global losses and then move on to positive transactions. Here we have, as you can see, I have drawn support levels, resistance levels. Here. What's really cool is that there

[16:16] really is a recording. Then you watch the recording and you can understand what you had here. Support levels kept bouncing off. They even updated it here, but still bounced back. That is, two levels of support.

[16:29] It looks very cool for a continuation, for removing all levels. Here I am already doing something, I think, I’ll go in now and put a shot in the hall. Drawn a support level. I go into the glass. Just change the volume, fool , where you go. That's it, I clicked

[16:44] , where you go. That's it, I clicked on the glass, the deal is open, everything is clear. And I set a stop loss. It is imperative to install them. But as you understand, the movements didn’t work out. Paid 105 bucks. Basically, a regular technical stop. Nothing

[16:59] special, they took it out, there was no movement, it stopped, I didn’t lose anything more. Well, then there is XPL, which you saw, and here, actually, are more losses. I'll just quickly skim through it. These are probably the most common basic losses. It will all

[17:13] be more or less similar to what you have already seen. Now, we actually need to move on to the most profitable, the fattest deals we had. So, let's sort by profit. Come on, brother, sort yourself out. What can't you

[17:28] sort for us? That we have no profit? Our biggest deal was on a Our biggest deal was on a Hi-Fi instrument. What were you doing here? It was n't me who did this. All. I don't know whose account this is. We will not analyze this deal.

[17:43] Joke. Don't know. Apparently he was just trying to collect some volatility. It's hard to say what happened here. Apparently, he tried to go both long and short. That's right, longaned, shorted, covered. Here I tried to long-gan, but I covered it. I tried to short here and

[17:57] closed the short. I tried to short here and closed the short. In short, it's just a collection of shafts. It is quite difficult to explain the collection of shafts, how it all looks in the glass, how it is. And , damn, as luck would have it, I don’t have this recording. Well, now I understand, ludik, everything is

[18:12] clear with you. I got 2,200 through some kind of trap, poked something there, did something there , didn’t show anything to anyone. Well, it's all clear, ludik. That's how it is. Let's move on to the next positive deal. The

[18:25] next, fattest deal was opened on the peace instrument. And, as you remember, I seemed to have longed this instrument somewhere around here . This is the biggest loss. And somewhere around here I closed it when I came back from the toilet.

[18:39] So, I come back from the toilet and understand that that’s it, we’ve already left this shopping area , the instrument can be stored. He will most likely be filming barks from us. Therefore, here I am entering into trades to continue the movement in

[18:52] the hope of breaking through these local levels that we have formed. That's actually what happened with us. Only a knock came from the pushchair. I immediately open a short position and close it on impulse. In principle, the stop here was beyond the local maximum.

[19:08] The stop, in short, was short, it turns out, plus 1,800 dollars. Well, I already understand this, this is already a beautiful, pretty deal. understand what I was doing at that time. It seems like I tried to write everything down so that I could

[19:21] explain and show it to you later, but apparently I had other things to do. Well, here, I think, it’s clear. In short, we are exiting this whole trading and breaking through the levels. We have no return to the range. Nobody buys this [ __ ] nonsense. Let's start

[19:34] bargaining. I'm going to withdraw lower liquidity. In short, everything is clear, everything is great. Plus 1,800 bucks. The next profitable trade was opened next profitable trade was opened on the Ae instrument. And as you remember,

[19:47] I gave away quite a lot on this deal . At first I came here for a continuation, then I tried to raise something here . These were top-ups, and now they are the top profit. Still, I found an entry point somewhere along the

[20:01] continuation, but, as you can see, in principle, there is also a top profit. What I see here is that the coin continues to move further. it was just a local instrument is active, you can even look at the fifteen-second time frame, and it

[20:17] even breaks through fifteen seconds. And if it comes out of these trading places, it can continue to go there. In short, the plan in this position was to at least renew the high, and possibly wait for further movement. As a result, this

[20:30] wait for further movement. As a result, this position was closed at 4.5% plus $886. And why is there such a small volume, such a small profit, right? Damn, because the stop here was quite big. It was unclear whether to

[20:46] push him beyond the very edge, or I didn’t want to push him beyond the very edge. And basically I thought: put, roughly speaking, yes, 100 more, but they just gave me the volume at the very high. I gave the volume at the very high, but the movement didn’t go and I decided to get out. As you

[21:02] can see, they carried us around for a little while, yes, then they still went higher, but yes, then they still went higher, but nevertheless, from a scalper’s point of view, it worked quite technically. That is, yes, the instrument is growing, yes, it didn’t work on the first

[21:15] try, yes, it didn’t work here either, but here it comes out of this trading range. Here, by the way, you can see it better on this screenshot. Here is the very trading screenshot. Here is the very trading

[21:29] Here it was trading. It went into a lower range and then returns to this range. I understand that most likely, on the return to this range, you need to enter and go long. I enter, the stop loss, most likely, was somewhere here,

[21:42] entered half the volume, and when we approached Hayam, I decided to add more volume, just in case the movement would continue, but it didn't, so I closed it. I was watching the order book at the time, watching what was happening.

[21:56] I also had a take-profit in case of some kind of spike, but, as you can see, I even exited manually. I don't know what exactly I didn't like there. Maybe I was afraid the instrument would quickly roll in and take my

[22:12] reason to exit. The instrument, in principle, is doing fine . Pings started to rise momentarily, and, in fact, the movement seems to be continuing. So, in principle, it could have been taken. Why did I

[22:26] exit? As we can see, it was even a mistake just now. There was no reason to do so based on the order book . The next profitable trade was opened on the instrument "peace." This instrument broke through its short levels very well. And the history

[22:42] trading, there is some momentum. The next one is one of the most Profitable trades were opened on the Peace instrument. This instrument has started to clear its shorts very well. There's a local order book that we've

[22:56] already broken through. We're also approaching some more important levels, and I'm starting to important levels, and I'm starting to slowly build up a position in advance in this instrument. Just to give you an idea of ​​the levels

[23:10] I was expecting to break through. Initially, there were these levels, but then again, we kind of pricked it, so I was waiting for us to reach, roughly speaking, a normal breakout, and finally clear out this liquidity. The order book is starting to slowly

[23:23] accelerate. Notifications are coming in, like, right now, that very breakout should happen. I already have closing limits set, as you can see. I've got everything spread out here, waiting for some good movement. Right now, you can see that

[23:37] my pings are starting to rise. Part of me is covered by limit orders. The instrument doesn't go any further, it starts to bounce; it doesn't it starts to bounce; it doesn't like anything. It's neither here nor there. I think, "Well,

[23:51] where are you going, bro?" Then it still continues to move. It takes some of my limit orders, and it takes me on limit orders. And then I realize that we've most likely broken the level, so I just took it and

[24:07] exited the position. As a result, in the trader's diary, this trade looks like this . Plus $799. Basically, a very cool, in my opinion, technical trade. We took it on a retest, gained, and went on. 2.8% is really cool,

[24:23] really cool, really beautiful, I'd say. The next profitable trade was opened on instrument A. Usually, lately, even a lot of instruments that are pumped, they don't break their level perfectly right away

[24:38] . Especially the more ideal the level, uh, resistance, the worse the breakout. Usually, if the level there is clumsy in one touch, all broken, broken, then it breaks through normally. But when the

[24:51] level is ideal, it usually breaks through, breaks through, and is immediately absorbed. taking sharpenings on a regular one is a very stupid decision. Why did I take trying to place a trade. Sop. You're already drawn. Get out. Ah, well, you see, I

[25:08] got out after all. That is, not on the first try. That's it, I double-clicked the sharpening here. Everything is fine. There's no movement, the order book isn't set up, what are you trading there? Well, what are you envy and record a video, because then you can at least understand what kind of

[25:22] nonsense you're watching. Now, it might seem to you that the order book is frozen, but on another monitor I saw that this instrument had already fallen, everything was okay, the pings were restored, our movement started right away and, roughly speaking,

[25:35] it gradually began to drain away. As a result, the position was closed at +3%, +300 bucks. The volume here was, in principle, small. Of course, I didn't have enough... To overdo it with volumes in such-and-such a market. Well, it worked out, it seems,

[25:50] not bad. Then, as you can see, this level was cut, cut, cut. We've already seen all this. The next top trade with a profit of $273 for the Hippo instrument, almost 3%. You can see this trade in the previous parts.

[26:04] did here. Well, obviously, you can see the slope, the pressure towards this slope. And we take an exit normal technical trade. The profit, I would say, is also appropriate here. The next trade is on the SPK instrument.

[26:19] Here we also have September 25th - these are my past days. Well, and then, basically, there's nothing to analyze. Here the profits were not as significant as they could have been. And plus, these are mainly profits from those

[26:35] previous parts, which you can see on my channel. There are, of course, some trades on ZRO, like hammering at the high, taking some impulse there. But this Again, you can see everything in the previous videos. Now

[26:48] click this button and open the entire position so you can entire position so you can understand the chronology. Here we're still trading outdoors, just sitting there, having a good time in the sauna. As soon as I get

[27:01] home, I start to experience some kind of collapse. -200, -100, -200, -100. I'm thinking, what's going on here? Here you can simply see a very important thing. You're trading small volumes at first, I'm not ashamed, understand and

[27:16] admit my mistakes. It's important for me to convey my mistakes to you in my analyses so that you can perhaps draw some conclusions. I'll exchange this deposit. And here, such negative points are clearly visible. Regarding

[27:31] volumes, because this is an unhealthy topic, this shouldn't happen. If you trade steadily there, say, at the 15th dash of 10,000, you shouldn't suddenly have 30,000. What, confidence suddenly appeared Or what happened? Ah, well,

[27:45] apparently, these minuses made themselves known, and the volumes started to inflate. Therefore, this thing of inflating volumes, there, excessive self-confidence, must be avoided, because,

[27:58] as we can see, we have a really good profit here. Well, again, volume, inflated volume, then there is another inflated volume, that is, some kind of excessive faith appears. This should not happen. There should be

[28:12] some stable loss on the deposit, so that such collapses of the cabins do not happen. It seems like everything is okay, but mistakes are visible, there is happens after the recovery of large losses. I decided to

[28:26] return to trading, I decided to trade after all. It all doesn’t always go wisely. Here was a series of minuses. 800, 400, another 400. Where are you going with this? What are you doing here? I just made 1,800

[28:43] bucks on such a beautiful technical deal and then immediately gave it all away. Anyway, you've seen all my trades, everything is open. Here are the results for this

[28:56] week. This is the first day of the boost, the second day of the boost, the third and fourth. I only traded for four days this week. Our balance for one week was +274%. Although, to be honest, it seems to me that this widget is somehow

[29:12] not working correctly, because I definitely couldn't have such a balance. My balance should be higher, because I be higher, because I spent $903 on commission. I get 42% of this money

[29:27] back. You can also get a refund using the links in the description. I personally trade through the Binance Plus exchange with the Tiger pair. And from there, I get this much back. So, we take another 42% of this amount,

[29:42] add it to this amount, and get the actual amount that get the actual amount that I had at the end of this week. For some reason, the widget is a bit, I would say, lying. In the end, my The cumulative

[29:55] profit looks like this. Just from trading, I managed to earn an extra $2,000 (approximately $906), but our balance is already around $ 3,900. Wow, that's how much we saved on commissions. Just so you

[30:09] understand, I get the saved commission, and this commission goes to spot, but I immediately transfer it from spot to futures so my deposit grows faster. That's why it's reflected here too,

[30:25] because every day I top up with these rebates that come from returning commissions. It's interesting, of course, when comparing TMMM with Tiger. The numbers are a bit different. Here it's $2,906, there it's $2,903, so I'm

[30:42] not sure who to believe. The win rate is 37.5, the odds are 2.2, which is a bit weak. Our log is 37.5, the odds are 2.2, which is a bit weak. Our log is 61%. Our average leverage is sixth. Regarding the question, what average leverage did you use? Leverage. On average, it was leverage six.

[30:56] Commission $90. Basically, the numbers are more or less similar for both numbers are more or less similar for both TMM and Tiger Broker. This data can't be changed. So, we're presenting it as is. Thank you all so much

[31:10] for watching. If you found the video helpful and liked it, be sure to like it and subscribe to the channel. Once we reach 2,000 likes, we'll make a new episode.